"On the spirit of obligations" and "friendship" - how each text views friendship pointing out to the meeting points.

Authors Avatar

We have before us two texts; one, "on the spirit of obligations" the other, "friendship". Both very different in terms of structure, style and images, yet both are closely linked thematically. The notions expressed in the text are ideas of friendship (as implied by the title of one of the texts) and human relations. It is interesting to explore how each text views friendship pointing out to the meeting points.

The texts are of extremely different style and structure simply because they each serve a very different purpose. The first is an essay written by William Hazlitt taken from "on the spirit of obligations", the second is a song- "friendship" by Cole Porter. Only from this we can asses that the essay is written as continues prose and is meant to publicize some opinion. An essay usually exists to be informative, present a view and thus will be serious, explanatory and detailed. This is very different from a song that is publicly released that in order to be popular has to be catchy, short verses, short snappy ideas that will be remembered, rhymes and a wider sense of appeal.

Join now!

The use of language in both texts differs, with relation to their purpose and their notion of friendship. In the essay, the use of language is more sophisticated, delicate more complex, almost as the friend or person Hazlitt is describing. The language also matches the nature of the friendship- more of the intellectual- "practical benevolence is not is forte", meaning that it wasn't a friendship on the day to day basis, or that he will offer help and favors. It sees this idea as "idle and vulgar". This stands in such contrast to the song, almost making a mockery ...

This is a preview of the whole essay