Oxfam and RSPCA comparisons.

Authors Avatar

Oxfam and RSPCA comparisons

        Nowadays charities face major problems, for example charities need money, but they need the money from people. So they try to make advertisements, so that people have sympathy for them and donate money. The Oxfam and RSPCA are trying to achieve to stop cruelty towards animals, kids and help the third world. To achieve this goal they need the finance support from the people more fortunate. Some charities are not government supported so they need help, so that’s why they turn to the next best thing the public.

        Let me start of with the Oxfam advertisement, this is effective cause there is a girl with a broken leg, bandaged eye, and something wrong with the arm. Which is also effective is the heading ‘ look me in the eye and tell me the arms control are tough enough’. I felt very sympathetic towards that, mainly because you see a little battered girl telling you to look her in the eye when she’s only got 1. The RSPCA is on the same motorway but going different direction, cause the layout is different for example there’s three different stories which make the reader sympathetic but not as much as the Oxfam. The RSPCA says if you pay £3 a month it will benefit the animals. So both advertisements are made for good causes, but for different species.

Join now!

        The Oxfam advertisement is about arms control. They believe 90% of casualties are caused by arms controls. Oxfam want to stop the new code of conduct on arms sales. The EU leaders say its tough. But Oxfam disagrees. So Oxfam wants to persuade people to back them up by stopping arms control. The RSPCA advertisement is mainly based on animal cruelty. They want £3 so it can save more animals lives. The RSPCA showed three sad stories about Billy, Nutcracker and Tom. These stories are about how these three creatures were viciously sabotaged by their owners. RSPCA objective was to ...

This is a preview of the whole essay