Typical gender representations in the films Casino Royale, Dead mans shoes and Control

Authors Avatar

James Cross

Typical gender representations in the films – Casino Royale, Dead man’s shoes and Control

Representations provide models for how we see gender, social groups, ethnic groups and many other things, I am going to talk about the representation of gender in the films I am studying.

In the action film “casino Royale” a very typical male action hero is represented in the form of James Bond (Daniel Craig). He fits in with the stereotype of a male action hero that viewers will expect to see when watching the film. The viewer may take enjoyment and comfort in the character conforming to their typical expectations. This representation presented is not real but a version of reality.

James Bond as a character has typical masculine traits such as – strength, confidence and aggression. He is also quick witted solving the problems that face him. This is a typical and mostly positive representation of males as physically fit, intelligent and confident however he also uses violence frequently which may not be considered a good trait. There is some truth in this representation because representations reflect cultural values and beliefs.

Join now!

Also in this film there is a typical representation of women with the character of Vesper Lynd. She is beautiful and typically feminine as she is fragile and passive - she needs protecting by a man, in this plot James Bond. This representation of women has been around for a long time and by some this is considered a negative representation. However as said earlier representations reflect real cultural values therefore negative or positive they have some reality.

Another film that features typical representations of male and female characters is control; Debby is a typical house wife and mother. ...

This is a preview of the whole essay

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

Avatar

This is a very insightful discourse on why stereotypes seem real to conventional audiences. It is well written in clear and simple language, and on the whole the structure is logical and pleasing, leading to an insightful and convincing conclusion. The essay does lack detailed analysis of examples from the films, and instead of describing actual events, objects or behaviours that prove their argument, the essayist's argument relies instead on quite general descriptions of the characters. This is a weakness, but an easy one to address, and it does not detract from the accuracy or insight of the argument itself. 3 stars