Quest-ce que constitue un bon film dans votre opinion? (what makes a good film in your opinion)
Extracts from this document...
Introduction
Qu'est-ce que constitue un bon film dans votre opinion? R�cemment, le taux de fr�quentation au cin�ma a augment� au plus �lev� point que d�j�, mais pourquoi ? Je pense que c'a augment� gr�ce � des effets sp�ciaux. Des effets sp�ciaux mettent une ambiance inimaginable dans une salle de cin�. L'utilisation des effets sp�ciaux aussi a augment� depuis il y a dix ans, et avec l'aide des nouvelles et plus sophistiqu� technologies, des films ont devenir plus int�ressants et aussi �poustouflants! ...read more.
Middle
La cont doit �tre 'facile-a-comprendre' pour les gens, et normalement, ils r�ussient avec cet objectif, gr�ce � des effets sp�ciaux. R�cemment, j'ai vu un film de com�die qui s'appelle " Tropic Thunder ". Ce film est un exemple d'un film qui � beaucoup de com�die, et est plein d'action, par exemple, il y a des explosions dans le film, lesquels rappellent l'attention des spectateurs. C'est n�cessaire d'avoir beaucoup des effets sp�ciaux, ce qui int�resse des spectateurs, afin de faire carton plein! ...read more.
Conclusion
Un film de com�die qui j'ai regard� lequel n'avait pas une bonne cont, s'appelle " Step Brothers ". Bien que il y avait quelque d'humour, la cont �tait nul et 'dur-a-comprendre', et donc, je n'aime pas ce film! En conclus, pour moi, un bon film doit avoir une cont int�r�t, et doit rappeler l'attention des spectateurs. En plus, il y doit a une bonne qualit� d'humour pour des films de com�die, et des effets sp�ciaux dans des films d'horreur doit effraye les gens, et donc, c' ces choses constituent un bon pour moi. Total Word Count : 372 Words ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.
This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level French section.
Found what you're looking for?
- Start learning 29% faster today
- 150,000+ documents available
- Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a star student thought of this essay
Response to the question
The essay answers the question well with some strong and well-analysed points, although it repeats these too often, and is well-written but with some spelling and grammar errors. The writer stays focused on the title throughout, so the whole essay ...
Read full reviewResponse to the question
The essay answers the question well with some strong and well-analysed points, although it repeats these too often, and is well-written but with some spelling and grammar errors. The writer stays focused on the title throughout, so the whole essay is a clear response to the question. They begin by talking about an increase in cinema-going and the growth of special effects to provide some context for their essay, then provide a number of reasons for why they like some films and don't like others. They emphasise that this is their personal view of films and that others might think differently, which shows that they understand an essay like this is about the writer's personal opinions and experiences rather than cinema in general.
Level of analysis
The writer shows appropriate analytical skills - for example, they say that films should have lots of special effects in order to attract the viewers' attention. They support this point with examples of a film they enjoyed - Tropic Thunder - and a film they didn't - Step Brothers. These points are summarised succintly in the conclusion, so the examiner is left with a strong final impression of what the themes of the essay are. However, paragraph 3 is perhaps too much a reversal of paragraph 2 - they say they like films which have special effects and a good story, then that they don't like films which don't have special effects and a good story, and the repetition makes it seem like they've run out of ideas a bit. Maybe they could develop the point at the beginning of the paragraph about romantic films, saying why they hate films when everyone cries, and perhaps giving an example of a film like this, instead of repeating the point about special effects, which doesn't make much sense - would you expect a romantic film to have lots of special effects? Does the lack of them really make it a bad film?
Quality of writing
This is wonderfully written, with appropriate technical vocabulary like "des effets spéciaux", imaginative language like "une ambiance inimaginable" and complex sentences with multiple clauses, such as the use of "et pour cette raison" to join together the fact that they don't like romantic films and why they don't at the beginning of paragraph 3. All of this is positive because it indicates that the writer has a wide and varied French vocabulary and can communicate fluently in French. However, there are several spelling and grammar mistakes, which need another good edit to weed them out. As they are, they mean that the writer's ambitious constructions don't always work and suggest a poor understanding of French grammar, which will make a bad impression on examiners. For example, "une cont" is mispelled throughout and should be "un conte", and "des effets spéciaux... doit effraye" in paragraph 4, line 1 doesn't use the auxiliary verb correctly - it should be "des effets spéciaux... doivent effrayer", because the noun is a plural and because any form of 'devoir' is followed by an infinitive verb.
Did you find this review helpful?
Join our team of reviewers and help other students learn
Reviewed by bookworm699 29/02/2012
Read less