• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the arguments in favour of the greater use of Direct Democracy in the UK (25) :

Extracts from this document...


Assess the arguments in favour of the greater use of Direct Democracy in the UK (25) : Direct Democracy is Government by the people, for the people; and allows citizens of a municipality or state to have a direct effect on both how they are governed, and the outcomes of certain issues; for example, in cases when a referendum is required. Referendums are a good example of Direct Democracy; voters can vote either 'Yes' or 'No' to express their opinions, and the majority wins. However, they rarely take place; normally only at a time of constitutional change, or when the issue is serious and based on public opinion. There hasn't been a UK wide referendum since 1975, though Scotland has had several since, for example to do with the dissolution of their Parliament. However, there are issues with this form of Democracy; as although it is direct, it is not necessarily fair, and this is the issue at hand. Referendums allow for 'tyranny of the majority' to occur, whereby the views of minority groups are insignificant, as the majority win despite issues with accurate representation in the results. ...read more.


In this particular referendum, 67.2% of voters said we should remain part of the European community; however, as the voter turn out for this referendum was only 64.5% of those eligible, only 43.3% of the population actually voted 'Yes'. This may therefore render redundant the argument that increased Direct Democracy in the UK, would allow people to have more of an opportunity to directly effect decisions normally made on their behalf. People cannot have more of an effect, if they are not turning out to vote. Other issues are to do with the suitability of the decisions made, as by increasing Direct Democracy in the UK we would need to have a more informed populace. The argument that greater use of Direct Democracy would result in a more informed citizenry, and therefore a more efficiently run country, can be called into question, mainly because these citizens may not want the responsibility of making these decisions. By electing representatives in General elections, they are trusting that these people who have the education necessary to use their vote wisely, will vote on their behalf, and in their interests. ...read more.


But whilst this may go someway towards improving the Governments public image, the problems remain that it is difficult to organise Referendums, and doing so on a regular basis will cost a lot of time and money. The Government can also make it difficult for a referendum to actually be passed, so it is arguable whether the people in reality would have more power than previously, or whether it would be an illusion to allow the Government to save face. In conclusion, I think that whilst the theory behind a greater use of Direct Democracy sounds good; 'People can make their own decisions, be more informed, take a greater role in politics' etc; putting it into practice in a fair manner would be pretty much impossible. However, the current system of an electing a representative to vote on the behalf of an area of the populace has also proven to be flawed, and so whilst not the best solution, a country run by Direct Democracy may be a better alternative to the current situation. Though of course, it would be extremely difficult and expensive to implement, and is therefore never likely to actually happen. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United Kingdom section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

3 Stars - A well structured essay that contained the key components of evaluation and argument throughout. The question was addressed.
Where the answer had weaknesses was that the concept of direct democracy was mainly referred to in quite theoretical terms - the answer would have been stronger had there been greater use of examples of direct democracy in practice.

Marked by teacher Dan Carter 26/09/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United Kingdom essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Describe the key international institutions and their impact on UK public services:

    3 star(s)

    supreme commanders. The armed services need to be ready to cooperate with NATO'S commands. The British government will send the armed service wherever they think they are needed. This means the deployment of peace keeping forces or rapid reactions forces in missions such as the NATO-led Kosovan force (KFOR)

  2. Is Britain an elective dictatorship?

    In between elections the government is still held accountable. The scrutiny and control of the executive is carried out in Prime Minister's question time, opposition days and back bench rebellions. Also the presence of collective cabinet responsibility means the cabinet has to side with government policies and therefore the Prime Minister usually has to have agreement from his cabinet.

  1. What are the main features of representative democracy? In what ways has political participation ...

    This means that British politics could potentially be damaged in the in the long-run as they are losing what could be key members of parliament as people to not want to get involved In politics. 1980 saw the level of party membership in any political party equate to approximately 1.7

  2. Conservatism is more a state of mind than a political ideology

    Therefore authority develops naturally. Conservatives have a paternalistic approach to authority they believe the state should act as the father figure because of human imperfection individuals don't know what's good for them so the state need to enforce when necessary harsh punishment and rules over the people.

  1. To what extent is the UK a two-party system?

    Ergo, despite the long lasting rule of majority governments from Labour and the Conservatives, with the FPTP system encouraging this majoritarian rule of recent history, it can be seen that the third party is rising to disturb the two-party system.

  2. How successful have the UK constitutional reforms been since 1997?

    This allows less workload on Westminster and parliament; this is a great advantage as institutions can do what?s best for them. Also with devolution it brings the public closer to the institutions via referendums and other political techniques that can gather what the individuals want or believe should be done or changed.

  1. The strengths of the UK constitution outweigh the weaknesses. Do you agree?

    In unwritten elements especially different clarifications of meanings can lead to confusion and opposing ideas. For example, works of authority such as The English Constitution by Walter Bagehot are open to interpretation and meanings can differ on a person to person basis.

  2. From what extent does the UK suffer from a participation crisis?

    This took away the limelight of the real politics and the problems that were most important and the readers had very little information on the political stories. The people do not know what is going on so therefore cannot be well informed enough to get involved in the politics that is happening.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work