• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"At The Heart Of Liberalism Lies A Fear Of Unchecked Power" - Discuss.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Liberalism : "At The Heart Of Liberalism Lies A Fear Of Unchecked Power" - Discuss In looking at this statement we have to first do one thing, separate liberalism in two forms, classical liberalism and modern liberalism. As these are very different from another they cannot be grouped together for this question. Hopefully this will let this question be answered more easily and perhaps an answer can be made for it. For classical liberalism a case can certainly be made for a fear of unchecked power being at its heart. Early classical liberal political commentators and philosophers based their beliefs on one simple overriding one - the state is a negative influence on people's lives and they wished to be from its persecution of them. Classical liberals are advocates of 'negative freedom', freedom from external restraint. Whilst this applies to many things other than a fear of an over-powerful government this stemmed from the liberal philosophers Locke's view on democracy. ...read more.

Middle

Classical liberals believe so firmly in laissez-faire economics and that humans were self-reliant that the state should not attempt to look after the few who were too weak to look after themselves. They believed giving even this much power to the state would be detrimental to their lives, as it would take their money in tax to look after these people who they believed deserved what they had in life as they had earned it. It is easy to conclude that at the heart of classical liberalism certainly lies a fear of unchecked power and that classical liberalism as an ideology is about combating that power and making certain it can not have any influence of individual rights and freedoms. This fear of unchecked power is overriding and influences all classical liberal ideas. In modern liberalism it is more difficult to find a fear of unchecked power. Modern liberalism does not seem to share many of the same values with liberalism. ...read more.

Conclusion

Modern liberals firmly believe in the importance of the individual before that of society or of the state but understand that equality of opportunity must be given for all to succeed as some are born with far more opportunity than others and some are born with little or no opportunity at all even if they are a brilliant person. Classical liberals would not believe in this and would see any form of helping individuals as the state overstepping what its boundaries should be and that people can make it to the maximum of their ability without help from the outside. At the heart of modern liberalism would seem to be a belief that the state should help individuals help themselves to become the best they can and give equal opportunity to all rather than help no one for fear of the state becoming all powerful. Modern liberals do fear unchecked power but not to the overriding extent that classical liberals do. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Analyse the similarities and differences between Classical and Modern Liberalism

    4 star(s)

    where wealth is redistributed through some form of welfare system to benefit those less rich and less able. Modern liberals claim that they have hindsight enough to know that unrestrained capitalism led to new forms of social injustice. Having frequently referred to the rival concepts of the 'role of the

  2. Analyse The Main Features of Classical Liberalism

    So, the moral worth of an action is determined by its outcome, the ends justify the means. Utility is good to be maximized. There theory equated 'good' with pleasure or happiness and 'evil' with pain or unhappiness. John Stuart Mill was a British philosopher, political economist, civil servant and Member of Parliament.

  1. "At the heart of New Right thought, lies the paradox of libertarian and authoritarian ...

    However, such governmental actions are limited in the consequentialists vision of the free society. This type of libertarianism is often associated with Milton Friedman, Ludwig von Mises, and Friedrich Hayek, the libertarians to whom Thatcher is fond of and is therefore linked to in her liberal thinking in the New Right.

  2. To what extent is Liberalism compatiable with democracy?

    This therefore leads to individual self-development (positive freedom) through people being better educated and having greater awareness; individuals see themselves as part of society. J S Mill was quoted he would rather be a "Socrates dissatisfied than a fool satisfied." Enhancing civil liberties gives the individual greater interest through becoming more conscious of their position in the state and an example of this is the 90 day detention.

  1. Is Liberalism compatible with democracy?

    In short, we could say that Rousseau was showing a preference for consensus politics rather than simple majority rule. Rousseau therefore rejected democracy as a satisfactory system of government, except in the unusual circumstance that a small community of enlightened individuals take into account the interests of others as well as their own.

  2. America Liberalism

    Puritan people would work hard, thus bringing good virtue, and perhaps proving to others that they were among the chosen few. This is not a liberal theme, unlike the progressive idea that all humans were created equal and had a certain amount of natural rights.

  1. T difficult for export orientated economics to sustain the land owning elites much longer. ...

    In Argentina there was no peasantry which made it easier for Peron to control and mobilise the urban working class who would provide him with a mass national support. (Cammack, 1999). The important thing to understand how populism restricted liberal democracy is that the mobilisation of the middle and urban

  2. Participation is the essence of democracy Discuss

    However, when Tony Blair was in power, he was seen as ?one of the best Prime Minister? in history. Though people questioned the credibility of this election due to the amount votes and it was said that it didn?t represent the whole population, it was still a democracy because a democracy is the right to vote.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work