British policy towards Palestine in the creation of Israel, one must carefully analyze British policy and also analyze, the other side of the equation, Zionism and the stand alone role they played in the creation of a Jewish state.

Authors Avatar

The Essay

To evaluate the significance or importance of British policy towards Palestine in the creation of Israel, one must carefully analyze British policy and also analyze, the other side of the equation, Zionism and the stand alone role they played in the creation of a Jewish state, and other factors that were outside the control of either organization. To say that British policy was the most significant factor in the envisaging of a Jewish state, would be false, but to say it played a rather important role in a catalyst of events that lead to the creation of a Jewish homeland would be more fitting and correct.

By November 1914 Britain, France and Russia were at war with Germany, Austria-Hungary and the Ottoman Empire. In February 1915 an Ottoman army from Palestine crossed the Sinai Peninsula into Egypt and attacked the Suez Canal. Britain was greatly concerned. The Suez Canal was an important waterway linking Britain with India and its empire east of the Suez. Britain urgently needed an Arab ally in its war against the Ottoman Turks. This was the beginnings of events, that created much complexity and problems in the matter concerning Palestine, the Arabs and the Jews.    

On the 14th of July, Britain tried to tempt Hussein, the leading figure on the Arabian peninsula, to join in the rebellion against the Turks. Sir Henry MacMahon, the High Commissioner for Egypt, sent Hussein a letter in October 1914 - known as the MacMahon correspondence. This stated that “Great Britain is prepared to recognize and support the Arab independence”, in the territory between the Mediterranean Sea and the Persian Gulf, with the exception of the area North of Damascus and the Persian Gulf itself, in exchange for an Arab revolt which would weaken the Central Powers. In the correspondence between Hussein and Sir Henry McMahon there was no delineation of borders or states; it was more of a "general" guarantee that would come back and cause the beginning of problems and issues in the territory of Palestine. The Arabs claimed that the MacMahon letter promised them the area of the land of Israel as part of an independent Arab state, while the British firmly denied this and maintained that this territory was not included in the area designated. While Hussein  and McMahon corresponded over the fate of the Middle East, the British were conducting more negotiations and dealings with the French over the same territory. In February 1916, the Sykes-Picot Agreement was signed, which, contrary to the contents of the Hussein -McMahon correspondence, proposed to partition the Middle East into French and British zones of control and interest. Under the Sykes-Picot Agreement, Palestine was to be administrated by the British.

Although it may seem, these “British policies” were not a significant factor in the creation of Israel, as they did not mention Jewish interests or a Jewish state,  they were significant in the sense that they were the beginning blocks in creating complexity, tension and problems in the disputed territory of Palestine. The Zionist movement would use the disunity among the Arabs, at this time to there advantage in eventually creating a Jewish homeland.

The final British pledge, and the one that formally committed the British to the Zionist cause, was the Balfour Declaration of November 1917. In British strategic thinking, the Zionists appeared as a potential ally capable of safeguarding British imperial interests in the region. Furthermore, as British war prospects dimmed throughout 1917, the War Cabinet calculated that supporting a Jewish entity in Palestine would mobilize America's influential Jewish community to support United States intervention in the war. Fears were also voiced in the Foreign Office that if Britain did not come out in favor of a Jewish entity in Palestine the Germans would preempt them. Finally, both parliament and Balfour were devout churchgoers who attached great religious significance to the proposed reinstatement of the Jews in their ancient homeland.

Join now!

The Balfour Declaration radically changed the status of the Zionist movement. The document declared the British government's "sympathy with Jewish Zionist aspirations," viewed with favor "the establishment in Palestine of a National Home for the Jewish People," and announced an intent to facilitate the achievement of this objective. Zionism was transformed by the British pledge from a quixotic dream into a legitimate and achievable undertaking. The Balfour Declaration was definitely one of Britain’s more significant and crucial policies towards Palestine in the creation of Israel.  It was a policy that slowly paved the way for the establishment of a Jewish ...

This is a preview of the whole essay