• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Checks and Balances in the US system

Extracts from this document...


Government Test Essay #19: Replacement for #26 Among the one of the most prominent of the seven governing principles incorporated into the Constitution, the system of checks and balances that exists across the three branches of government (the executive, legislative, and judicial) were created ensure that no one branch becomes too powerful or corrupt. Since each branch can check the other two with powers delegated to it by the Constitution and balance the spread of power, it is theoretically intended to maintain an effective government, however this system also allows for heavy policy gridlock in the modern day with each branch of government "fighting" against the others using, even abusing, the checks and balances system. Often considered the most crucial and democratic branch of government, the bicameral legislative branch consisting of the House of Representatives and the Senate are given the duties of making federal law and, thus, hold several checks and balances upon the executive and judicial branches. Upon the executive branch, Congress is delegated the powers to impeach the president, override a presidential veto with a two-thirds majority, approve all cabinet members as well as all treaties and ambassadors. ...read more.


nation from overbearing or corrupt laws passed by a simple majority of Congress and forces the legislature to reconsider the implications of the bill. Along with the veto power, the executive branch is also able to limit congressional reach since the president is given the title of Commander-and-chief of the military and the Vice President presides as President of the Senate. These appointed titles keep the legislature from fully controlling military activity and gives the executive branch the deciding vote in case of an evenly split Senate vote. According the Constitution, the executive branch is essentially the creator, yet a separate power from, of the judicial branch since executive checks over the judicial branch include the ability to appoint federal judges according to the president's criteria for such judges. This crucial power over the judicial branch ensures that the courts will not intentionally become unjust with its powers. Hence, executive checks are arguably provide most of the President's and cabinets duties in the modern day as it continually oversees congressional policy and federal judges. ...read more.


For example, the journey for a bill to become a law must pass through numerous checks of all three branches in order to be implemented as policy and at any turn, a branch may express its disapproval, including presidential veto, interpreted as unconstitutional, or voted down by the other house of Congress, and possibly compromise its success. Very rarely is policy passed quickly through the governmental system unless one faction holds a majority over the three branches. Comparable to insurance for a just government as set up by the Constitution, the system of checks and balances comes at the cost of diminishing the efficiency of government while gaining worth in protecting the nation against a tyrannical ruling power. Altogether, the system of checks and balances holds a dual duty in protecting a branch's powers from impedance by the other two and monitoring the others use of their powers correctly and efficiently. Despite its righteous intentions, this safety measure also allows for policy gridlock in the modern age and often slows the government to a minimal pace during an era of divided government. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United States section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United States essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The US system of checks and balances is ineffective, discuss.

    3 star(s)

    they can balance the Supreme Court to be more or less Socialist or Conservative to suit their requirements however these actions can be countered by the Legislature in that if they disagree with the decision and can get a 2/3rds majority, then that appointment will not be allowed.

  2. How effective are the checks and balances of the Constitution today?

    The executive also carry out checks and balances on themselves, members of the cabinet and the Vice President have the power to dismiss the President if they feel that the President is not fit to discharge his duties. The President appoints federal judges to the Supreme Court, and has the

  1. Examine the effectiveness of the checks and balances system of the American Government. and ...

    The President also has the power to pardon - President Ford pardoned his predecessor President Nixon. The Legislature has the power to change the size of the Federal Court system and the number of justices within the court. Congress has the power to propose constitutional amendments and can reject Supreme Court nominees; they can also impeach and remove federal judges.

  2. How well does the US Constitution Work

    These policies can include supporting unions, discouraging companies from exporting jobs overseas, and increasing the minimum wage. Democrats believe that companies must be regulated (to an extent) to ensure fair compensation and treatment of workers, to prevent corporations from abusing employees, and to reduce corporate fraud.

  1. Critically analyse the appointment and confirmation process for nominees in the US Supreme Court

    at all."[9] Thus Presidents cannot subordinate the justices, for that would contravene the rule of law (a fundamental requirement for the judiciary to be independent from executive control). In its methods politicisation is rife in the appointments and confirmation process, but in its results this trait is not definite, as

  2. There Are No Effective Checks On Presidential Power. Discuss

    to declaring the line item veto to be invalid. In recent years the Supreme Court has extended its role by over-ruling the President?s decision to hold detainees indefinitely at Guantanamo Bay and use military tribunals to try them. As a result, it is wrong to claim that there are no effective checks on Presidential power.

  1. '9 politicians sitting on a bench.' Critically evaluate this description of the US Supreme ...

    Again this is evidence of the politicised nature of the nomination process, which provides further evidence that Supreme Court justices act as politicians. All of the criticisms made about the nominees above sound more like criticisms of a candidate running for political office.

  2. Assess the view that the US Constitution often ensures limited government

    The judge he would be replacing was a moderate, and was often referred to as a ?swing vote?. Bork was a conservative, and so to be appointed would mean the court would be tilted to the right. Reagan withdrew the nomination[14].

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work