Concepts exercise - Sovereignty

Authors Avatar

Concepts exercise

Sovereignty

Sovereignty refers to ultimate and absolute authority designated to either an individual or an institutional body.

The term sovereignty could be contested due to the fact that there is no universally agreed definition. Thomas Hobbes defined what he considered the basis of a political body as ‘the most high and perpetual.’ (Hobbes, quoted in Heywood, 1997, p26.) This view has proved rather simplistic. It fails to take into consideration the limitations on the sovereign. Bodin highlighted that although sovereignty provided absolutism, there were restrictions such as natural laws. (Bodin quoted in Heywood, 1997, p26).  Offe supports this by explaining of international restrictions on the sovereign. ‘National communities by no means exclusively ‘programme’ the actions, decisions and policies of their governments.’(Offe, quoted in Held, 2002, p352). The concept can be further contested by focusing on the nature of the sovereign. It is largely accepted that the sovereign holds the ultimate power. However there are critics that argue that due to sovereignty being intrinsic to democracy, the ultimate power lies with the electorate. ‘The people rule through the sovereign. The sovereign is their representative.’ (Held, 2002, p77). This contests the idea that there is a single, ultimate source of power. David Held supported this by explaining that sovereignty is divided among ‘national, regional and international’ agencies. (Held, 2002, p352).

Join now!

The concept can be questioned due to distinctions being made between legal, political, external and internal sovereignty. (Heywood, 1997, p143). Due to the existence of a typology, the concept is more likely to be contested. The nature of sovereignty advocated can also cast disagreements as not all interpretations are based on a democratic regime. The contested nature of sovereignty is summarised by David Held, who explains it ‘no longer retains the meaning that it had 50 years ago. The concept is premised upon a bounded territorial state system, increasingly threatened by social and technological change.’ (Bealey, Chapman, Sheehan, 1999, p323).

...

This is a preview of the whole essay