• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Consider the Political Issues about the Role and Composition of a Second Chamber.

Extracts from this document...


Consider the Political Issues about the Role and Composition of a Second Chamber The early history of the Lords is important to see how this body has developed into what it it is to this present day. Even from 1500 the House of Lords had equal status to the House of Commons, its members were few in number and were not elected. You could gain the title from inheriting peerage to a peer or nominated peer by the monarch. As early as the sixteenth century it was the elected House of Commons that took the initiative against the monarch in matters of policy, with the Lords being a more conservative body, supporting the monarch. This role lasted well into the nineteenth century. The turning point was in the nineteenth century when the Lords refused to adhere to the constitutional convention the result was that the House of Lords power was greatly reduced and now played a minor role in the government. The constitution included the Lords not taking part in money bills and if the government of the day had a clear mandate for a bill, the Lords should allow the bill to pass. ...read more.


A few hereditary peers remain until a further major reform of the Lords takes place, the Prime Minister can still create new members. There is still no elective process in omission of members. There is no written constitution that specifies the role of the Lords, although custom plays a strong part. The present role of the House of Lords is to scrutinise the work of the executive. The Lords have a question time and every government department has one peer linked to it who will answer questions. Debating bills is also important; all bills need to be passed by both the Commons and the Lords. They will revise them carefully; the Lords can make amendments to improve them. Often this is done because the Commons don't have time to deal with a bill properly. Pressure groups often rely on the Lords to make changes to bills, as they often cannot get access to Commons standing committees. The Lords have the power to delay bills. They would do this if they thought a particular bill was wrong or unnecessary and would act to delay its passage. ...read more.


This is also another way of bringing possible talent into the government. There are many issues surrounding the composition and roles of the Lords government. The main criticism is the method of selection. In particular hereditary peerage, why should you be in Lords because your great grandfather was a brilliant general? Or your farther had the money to buy a peerage from Lloyd George in 1921. Also being the being a man's eldest son is not a good criterion. The system appears particularly r****t and s****t, with very few women and members of ethnic minorities. The Lords discriminates on religious grounds too, because there are only Church of England bishops, with no Catholic bishops or elders of any other faith. The Conservatives tend to dominate, and many hereditary peers only come to the Lords when requested by Conservative whips to vote for Conservative measures. The Lords do not appear to do much, they appear relatively powerless, and much of their work in the legislative process is what the Commons really should be doing. With regard to payments to the peerage - although they are not paid, they receive a generous attendance allowance. They do not have to vote, speak or take part in any way to receive these payments. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United Kingdom section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United Kingdom essays

  1. What is the main reason for the loss of faith and interest in our ...

    some facts and figures from past investigations which will hopefully demonstrate the change in public opinion. We will also look at possible causes of the change in more detail including recent events that have taken place, controversial legislation which has been passed, and any other confounding factors which may be responsible for the recessive view of government and politics today.

  2. Evaluate the above statement and consider the extent to which you think it is ...

    The Prime Minister is, in normal circumstances,12 the leader of the party that has won the most seats in the House of Commons, which is the body invested with the most legislative power. The Prime Minister is also the leader of the Cabinet13, which controls the executive arm of government,

  1. House Of Lords Reform - What did the 1999 act reforming the lords ...

    There is another "con" with the idea of a partially elected lords would be that there is already the House of Commons which is elected, why have a second chamber which is elected? The Lords could start to reject more because they can argue that they are legitimate and thus can undermine the work of the lords.

  2. Draft a memorandum to the government evaluating the merits and demerits of differing reform ...

    the Royal Commission, for the Reform of the House of Lords and also the leader of the opposition the Right Honourable Ian Duncan Smith's proposals. The option of a directly elected second chamber to secure a 'more democratic and more representative' House of Lords does cause us to question what method of electoral representation is to be used.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work