• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Consider whether the growth of primary elections in the Presidential nomination process has reduced the role and functions of the national nominating conventions to a mere formality

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Consider whether the growth of primary elections in the Presidential nomination process has reduced the role and functions of the national nominating conventions to a mere formality. (40 marks) The Democrat convention of 2008 marked the first time since 1976 (and the Republican NNC), that a party's presidential candidate had been in doubt at the opening of a National Nominating Convention. The growth in the role of primaries has often made certain the party's candidates prior to the occasion, arguably reducing the role of the NNCs to a mere formality? Primary elections occur in the first half of an election year, with the electorate voting for who they would like to run in the upcoming Presidential election. Arguably this further increases the democracy of the country, by involving the electorate at such an early stage in an election campaign. Prior to the reforms of 1976, states held a series of meetings (not too dissimilar to the caucuses held today) in "smoke-filled rooms", where the party bosses of each state, decided on who they would support for the party's nomination. The voters were blissfully unaware of this stage, usually only taking notice when the official election season began following the NNC. ...read more.

Middle

Candidates may appear on TV news shows such as NBC's influential "Meet the Press" or "The Capital Gang" on CNN. These programmes have in-depth interviews which are a great opportunity for candidates to get "their name out there" and gain support, prior to the official campaigning season. Chat shows such as "The Late Show" give candidates a chance to show their more human side and appeal to the more "style-conscious" voters. Candidates may prepare and deliver formal speeches (free from party endorsement) to possible supporters; others may write a book in which they give across their key policy ideas (e.g. Barack Obama's "Audacity of Hope" in 2008). With sufficient marketing, books can give a candidate a good foothold with the more politically-aware electorate. Public feeling and comments made in the media give a good indication of the strongest candidates with the highest chance of gaining a party nomination. In 2000, helped by his role as incumbent Vice-President, Al Gore gained a lot of popular support during the invisible primaries, going on to easily win the Democrat's nomination. The main role of the National Nominating Conventions have undeniably decreased in recent years, with in many cases the event simply been a confirmation of the leading candidate. ...read more.

Conclusion

This arguably worked as he enjoyed a boost of 7% points the following day. The conventions also formally announce the candidate for Vice-Presidency. This, however, attributes to the argument that NNCs are now a mere formality, as these are almost always known beforehand. Having said that, the less politically aware voters may be encouraged to vote for a particular candidate on the basis of their running mate, alone. In 2008, for instance, John McCain gained a large proportion of the female vote following the Democrat convention (and the announcement of Barack Obama as their candidate) and the loss of Hillary Clinton. McCain's running mate was, of course, Sarah Palin. There is no doubt that the National Nominating Conventions will continue for many years to come, however their role and purpose has changed significantly since their formation. The traditional idea of them been the stage to announce a party's candidate to the country, for the first time, is long gone since the advent of primaries and the media. However, calling them a "mere formality" is misleading as they serve a very important purpose of brining in voters and giving across the party's message. Yes, their role has changed, but it has changed for the better. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United States section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United States essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Why are US presidential elections so long ?

    4 star(s)

    An "invisible primary" is the time between when a candidate announces they are to run for president and the first contests of the primary season. It is often critical for candidates to use this time to build up an early support base, organise their campaign and gather much needed funds for the coming campaigns.

  2. Describe the process of impeachment and explain why it is difficult to remove the ...

    vote against his removal but, still look like they are supporting the US constitution. Secondly, the process of impeachment is extremely difficult to complete. This point is similar to the difficulty in changing the constitution. Such a high majority is required in several stages.

  1. Explain the significance of the New Hampshire Primary and the Iowa Caucus in the ...

    The New Hampshire primary of 1968 was of particular significance, especially for Johnson. He fell behind McCarthy by seven points, and as a result, withdrew from the campaign, announcing that "I shall not seek, and will not accept, the nomination of my party for another term as your president".

  2. Consider the importance of invisible primaries in US Presidential elections.

    But fundamentally the period is significant to the electorate as it ensures that voters are aware of who they are voting for in the forthcoming primaries and caucuses. Many have identified that the front runner of the invisible primary is the winner of the actually presidential nomination.

  1. The advantages of primary elections far outweigh their disadvantages in the selection of each ...

    This national popularity can make or break a candidate. In 2008, some analysts were sceptical about Barack Obama?s chances as they did not know how he would fare in the South, but having broken these states, he went on to become candidate and subsequently 2 term president. The hard going nature is almost like a dry run for the actual presidential election campaign.

  2. Does public participation in the presidential nomination process advance or hinder democracy?

    The long process of the modern primaries allows us to get to know the candidates and as it is a gruelling process much like running the country, we can learn whether a candidate is fit for the presidency. For example, in 1992, Senator Paul Tsongas, who had fought back from

  1. What are Primary elections and why have they been criticised?

    On October 19, 2008, Obama's campaign announced a record fundraising total of $150 million for September 2008. This exceeded the campaign's single-month record ($66 million) for August 2008. Again Primary elections are criticised as they encourage internal party strife instead of fostering an environment of negotiation, consultation, and compromise at

  2. Why was Bill Clinton able to win the Presidential elections of 1992 and 1996?

    Clinton was lucky with the level of incompetence shown by both of his rivals; as aforementioned, Bush ran his 1992 campaign poorly and was simply ?out of touch? and Clinton?s opponent in 1996, Bob Dole, was, it seems, unable to present mathematically justifiable economic policies.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work