• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Could one censor p*********y, on Millean grounds?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Could one censor p*********y, on Millean grounds? For years the censorship of p*********y has been heavily debated, with philosophers like Mill commonly being quoted. Although Mill does not specifically refer to p*********y in his work he gives a variety of principles, all of which are open to interpretation, by which we can come to conclusions on censorship. Views on censorship mainly depend on the harm or offence it causes and what kind of p*********y is being considered. p*********y ranges from hardcore to soft, involving consenting adults on one hand and on the other hand forcing children to participate in it. Similarly some viewers simply look at it and it has no other effect on them except to "stimulate s****l excitement"1. However it is claimed that some p*********y depicts a degrading picture of women and in some cases has incited men to use violence against women. In my essay I shall outline what Mill stated concerning freedom of action, spend some time defining and explaining p*********y and then link the two, showing both arguments for and against censorship of p*********y on Millean grounds. J.S.Mill is often referred to as the founding father of modern liberalism particularly due to his emphasis on freedom of speech and action and minimal government interference so as to maximise human development. ...read more.

Middle

Many would even go as far to say that there is no such thing as a self-regarding act as "no action, however intimate, is free from social consequences"10. Therefore as p*********y does have consequences on society, most of which people believe are bad, it should be censored. One could also argue that Mill being a utilitarian would censor p*********y as it does not bring happiness and therefore is a wrong action. Ryan admits that "the utilitarian must admit there will be cases where people are made happier by giving them less freedom rather than more"11 and therefore censoring p*********y might be right. However Mill believes that we all search for a higher truth in our actions in regard to mortality and that is why they should not be interfered with as it is an "invasion of liberty which thwarts the development of human individuality"12. p*********y, though, is not about great moral and philosophical truths, does not help individuals develop and has no real value except to satisfy people's base lusts in life. Therefore as it is a lower physical pleasure, perhaps one can argue that Mill would censor it as it is not beneficial to society's progress. ...read more.

Conclusion

And this would mean the state would start to claim to be "an infallible guide on such matters"22 which is dangerous. Thus many like Brannon Miller believe that Mill would not support censoring because "informal sanctions of society"23 and "oppressive legal controls"24 would inhibit people's individual liberty. And if the government is given a freer hand in interfering with society in more trivial issues such as p*********y it might then lead to further interference in more important issues in society. There is also the minor issue that it would be very hard for a government to censor p*********y today due to the most common medium being the Internet, which is extremely difficult to control. Although personally I would myself censor p*********y and perhaps even ban it given half a chance, I have to agree that from reading Mill, on his grounds you probably would not censor p*********y. This would mainly be because it does not fulfil his principle of interference if there is harm and I do agree that he is referring to direct harm rather than "potential harm"25, however narrow that view may be. Censoring p*********y would restrict people's liberty to act as they please and also curtail the happiness of those who find enjoyment in the baser, lower pleasures of life. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. So, whats wrong with Anarchism?

    The Spaniards baked Bakunin when he broke with Marx in 1872 over the First International. By 1915 they had over 1 million supporters and in 1921 when the Spanish Communist Party was formed they had four times as many members as the communists10.

  2. Implanted Truths

    As a young child, Wright does not inherently know that there must be differences between him and the white people he sees every day. This is best shown when, as a young child, Wright can not understand the outrage of the blacks around him concerning the beating of black child at the hands of a white man.

  1. America Liberalism

    What we behold in our minds as liberal may not be what Hamilton or Jefferson had in mind, but it is structured by the same basic principle we look back on when we seek verification. The Federalists had a huge and lasting effect on the American thought on the ideas of liberalism.

  2. John Stuart Mill was the son of a philosopher who worked with Jeremy Bentham. ...

    The strongest difference between rule and act utilitarianism is that act is a quantitative judgement whereas rule is a qualitative judgement. (b) Utilitarianism may be regarded as a strong ethical theory as there are many strengths to it. It is a practical theory because it is easy to use by

  1. Year 12 Essay On Utilitarianism

    Rule utilitarian's follow a guideline for general decision making within a community to achieve the greatest good for the greatest number. Weak rule utilitarian's bend the rules to fit with the circumstances. Strong rule utilitarian's follow the rules to the exact words. There are a number of difficulties with utilitarianism.

  2. The ability to manage conflict is undoubtedly one of the most important skills a ...

    Many potential conflict situations are just not worth the time and effort of getting involved. Or you may want to collect more information rather take immediate action. Sometimes temporary avoidance is the best policy to let everyone "cool down". Avoidance is also a good choice when it is more appropriate

  1. The relationship between censorship and student publications by specifically drawing on the Rabelais case

    Heerey J8 provided further insight, claiming this relationship to accommodate an imbalance in which the protection of representative democracy overrides the protection of dissent9 by student publications: It should be noted that Anarchist theory extended from non-violent writers and political leaders like Tolstoy, Thoreau and Ghandi to Proudhon (property is theft)...

  2. Compare Hobbes and Locke's views on the obligation to obey the law.

    every man will, and may lawfully rely on his own strength and art, for caution against all other men. Hence there obtains Hobbes's famous 'state of war', with every man's hand against every man. John Locke and Thomas Hobbes both agreed that a ruler of some sort appeared absolutely necessary for a country to thrive and flourish.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work