• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6

Critically evaluate the notion that the EU is controlled by a host of unelected and unaccountable bureaucrats.

Extracts from this document...


Critically evaluate the notion that the EU is controlled by a host of unelected and unaccountable bureaucrats. Over the last 50 years, the European Union has grown not only economically but also politically from the original six members. Many would say that The European Union has provided stability, peace and economic wealth for its member states. It has helped to raise standards of living, built an internal market, launched the Euro and strengthened the Union's position in the global market. However the structure and size of the EU has changed dramatically since the original six, and many would argue that's its original objectives have changed from a simple desire to create a free trade area to an economic and possibly political union. It is this growth in size (with 10 more member states to join in 2004) and power that has resulted in the EU coming under fire in recent years over the way in which its institutions are run. The growth in power of the EU has inevitably led to a growth in the power of its institutions, many of which are run by unelected civil servants. Member states, as they have joined, have given up a certain amount of sovereignty to each of these institutions so that they can make decisions on certain policy areas. These decisions should be made in the interest of the EU and so many believe there should be elected officials within these institutions to represent their views, however this is not usually the case. It is this that has led to the notion that the EU is controlled by a host of unelected and unaccountable bureaucrats. ...read more.


There is no real forum for holding the European Commission to account. Also the bankers who run the ECB are accountable to no one and cannot be removed no matter what the effects of their decisions are. Many believe that Europe cannot continue to be governed by civil servants and ministers behind closed doors in Brussels. Conservative leader, Iain Duncan Smith is amongst those that believe this he stated that " The Eu's centralised structures represent a costly and ineffective compromise between the supranational and the intergovernmental. Europe should be more transparent and more accountable to the people who pay for it, founded on a co-operation between nations not supranational institutions." (Telegraph Website). The core of this debate is arguably centred around those institutions which are more powerful than those run by elected MEP's. The Commission as already mentioned is seen as the driving force of the EU. It is an executive body and initiates new laws. However the Council of Ministers, also unelected has a main role of passing laws, this highlights the power of unelected officials who are making decisions on our behalf, and are accountable to no one if the decisions are deemed to be inappropriate. Coreper do all the civil service work behind the scenes. The ECB also seems to support the notion as it is run by unelected financiers who have control over the monetary union which is arguably the most powerful institutions in Europe. Evidence of the power held by institutions such as the Commission can be found when looking at the Commissions handling of the Competition policy. The European Commission blocked the $45bn deal between US firms General Electric (GE) ...read more.


This highlights the move towards a more supranational power, as with QMV a majority decision will be enough to pass a law or treaty. The majority is decided by population at least 60 % of the population of Europe will be accepted as a majority vote. This may lead to smaller countries having less power as it is likely that they can't all agree and a*s a law without the support of at least one of the 'big five' such as Germany, France or the UK. This could mean that no individual nation would be able to alter the laws by which it is governed. It would put the making of these laws beyond member states, surrendering them to a supranational and unaccountable body. However UK Prime Minister, Tony Blair has insisted that he will not allow the new European constitution to diminish British sovereignty especially in the areas of defence, tax and foreign policy. (BBC news website.) Having weighed up each side of the debate and investigating the power each institution holds, I would conclude by agreeing in principle with the notion that the EU is run by a host of unaccountable and unelected bureaucrats. However this is not to say that this is a necessarily a negative issue, as there is no guarantee that elected officials would be more suitable representatives. Civil servants are usually highly skilled professionals and so many would agree that they may be the best for the job. So although I agree with the notion I accept the fact that having elected and accountable officials instead of unelected civil servants , will not always guarantee that the citizens of Europe will have a say in the running of the EU, or that their views would be represented. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level European Union section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level European Union essays

  1. Which EU institution is the most powerful

    Each country is assigned a number of votes in proportion to its share of population, this is called quality majority voting (QMV). The Council has two formations such as the 23 Specialised Councils, whose membership changes according to the subject being discussed, such as "Environment", "Transport", "Industry", and "Economics and Finance".

  2. The UN is an ineffective Peacekeeper. Discuss

    From 6,000 to 20,000. As a result of this, Cambodia is now heavily effected by AIDS. Another example of where the UN peacekeeping was relatively successful as parties to the dispute were in accord is Bosnia. The Dayton proximity talks were a success as The Bosnian Government and Croatians reached a compromise and forced the Serbians to acquiesce.

  1. Free essay

    Has British Politics been Europeanised

    One major criticism that can be made about the European Union is the fact that there is uneven rule implementation in alternate member states; this could possible lead to the rise of 'popular resentment.' In addition, "...internationalists accept the interdependence of Britain with Europe and the rest of the world,

  2. Evaluate the likely changes to the structure of the principle EU institutions due to ...

    In 1984 the PHARE programme was created to provide support financially to accession countries so that they can expand and meet the accession criteria, later to be named the Copenhagen criteria. The county must have stable institutions, the rule of law, human rights and the ability to hand any responsibilities and requirements that the EU puts to them.

  1. EU functions

    Members of the commission are informally known as "commissioners". Commissioners usually have a background in politics in their country, but they are required to be independent of their countries national government and be completely committed to being commissioners and act in the best interest of the union as a whole.

  2. What Are The Functions Of The Four EU Institutions? How Are European Laws Made?

    This is left to the council of ministers. In many ways, the European Parliament is very similar to the House of Lords in the UK. The European parliament also controls the Commission to an extent - it must approve all appointments to it. It also controls the budget of the EU.

  1. Transformation of the U.S. Hegemony in Europe through NATO after the Cold War

    that were implemented in Bosnia showed the difficulty of the coordinated action. This concern was mainly voiced by the U.S. in order to increase the chance of a successful joint military operation and the credibility of NATO as a prime actor.

  2. Is it possible to talk of civil society beyond the nation-state? Although a clich, ...

    - does not resemble a 'global community'.9 However, it ought to constitute a culture of self-awareness about the 'hybridity and complexity of the world.'10 And importantly, "civil society is not the market: it is a non-commercial realm. Civil society bodies are not companies or parts of firms; nor do they seek to make profits.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work