• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Critically examine the ways a pressure group contributes to representative democracy

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Critically examine the ways a pressure group contributes to representative democracy 1. states what representative democracy is 2. three/four paragraphs on what the pro-pluralist view is. Use the cards. 3. For each statement to ensure that you link the idea to the title 4. Throughout give examples of pressure groups to support your case 5. The case against. Now outline the anti-pluralist view ( Robert's page 331) In a representative democracy, citizens elect representatives to make decisions for them. In doing this, citizens hand over the responsibility for making decisions to someone else. In Britian voters elect members of parliament's (MPs) to represent them every four to five years and this makes the representatives in some way accountable to the electorate. However many are unsatisfied with their representation and join pressure groups to make their views heard. ...read more.

Middle

However one thing is for sure, four to five years is a long time for the electorate to not have a say in their government. New issues come up and popular opinion changes, having pressure groups allow the population to be heard more regularly - something which is surely good for a democracy which is meant to represent the people. Many people thing the system of having pressure groups complements a representative democracy because surely the right to join groups is a mark of a free society. Many people think minority voices are generally unheeded; pressure groups mean that these minorities can be heard more effectively an example of this is the pressure group Gay lib. Another positive thing about pressure groups of that they encourage political participation. In a country where the number of people who vote is going down, pressure groups allow people to become more politically aware especially those under the age of eighteen. ...read more.

Conclusion

The pressure groups may not be representative of their members and their officers are not usually elected. Furthermore many Marxists say that pressure groups are just a tool used by the elite distract the population from seriously challenging them politically. They say the elite (the government) make the population believes that they can make a difference using pressure groups when this is not the case. They point out that pressure groups only normally succeed when government policy is in their favour and that the government only does what it wants to and doesn't take a balanced view point. To conclude I think that pressure groups play an important part in our representative democracy. There allow people to participate between elections, and they allow minority voices to be heard. However pressure groups shouldn't be the be all and end all as certain parts of them detract from a representative democracy. For instance there an elected and the government houses and agenda. By Hannah Gray ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Pressure Groups section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Pressure Groups essays

  1. Are pressure groups good or bad for democracy?

    The debates around this question can last forever. Though, in my opinion there is still a chance for each pressure group to make a difference. But its members have to be really enthusiastic and active to make the government listen to them. Only with energy and patience they can reach success.

  2. The wealthier and the closer the pressure group is to the government, the more ...

    However, this is not always the case, as there are outsider groups who would never contemplate becoming an insider group. For example, socialist groups would never consider becoming associated with a Conservative government The implications of this suggest that whilst wealth, and insider status are extremely beneficial in influencing the government.

  1. In what ways, if at all, might it be said that democracy ensures power ...

    Pluralists argue that pressure groups increase participation and make our political system more accessible thereby strengthening the basis of pluralist democracy. The immense strength of pressure groups under the labour government is ever becoming more significant. Under a conservative government pressure groups such as charter 88 gained insider status (Grant,1998).

  2. The existence of pressure group makes government more democratic; the activities of pressure groups ...

    For many groups insider status is desirable, however there are groups who do not want it, for example environmental groups have often declined money offered to them by the Euro Commission as it may affect their independence, because although insider groups are influential, they must also moderate their demands to make them seem more realistic.

  1. This house believes that democracy is undesirable for a good society".

    for long have seen a better way of life for their citizens. There are many more nations going over to democracy also, which is testament to its success. * Finally, it is argued that people who do not vote or participate in politics have no right to an opinion on any political matters.

  2. Analyse whether Britain is a true democracy

    o Love ~ A soul quality, which makes us able to hold both our adversaries and friends in our hearts with equal compassion, in which makes some of us do what the person we love wants, even though we may disagree with it, in order to make them happy.

  1. Pressure group democracy.

    Pressure groups help the powerful in society bur not the weak. Discussion. The statement above is on a subject, which has many layers so I find it difficult to be able to take a right or wrong stance because in some ways it is true, whilst in others it is not.

  2. Article reviewed: deLeon, Peter, and Ralph C. Longobardi. "Policy Analysis in the Good Society." ...

    the failure to more fully develop the argument for, and proof of, these sometimes intangible but important benefits. Although education is discussed later in the article, there is a passage in this section remarking how the communitarian scholars argue that a "...defined sense of personal duty augments a coherent and civil community."

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work