• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Describe the functions of the Council of Ministers, European Commission, the European Parliament and the European Court of Justice in making and interpreting European Union law.

Extracts from this document...


Law Exam Question June 2003 3 (a) Describe the functions of the Council of Ministers, European Commission, the European Parliament and the European Court of Justice in making and interpreting European Union law (15 marks) There are 4 main institutions established by the Treaty of Rome, which make and interpret law in the European Union. The first of these is the Council of Ministers. For example, the Minister for Agriculture will attend meetings when the issue to be discussed involves agriculture. This means that the exact membership of the Council varies depending on the topic. Twice a year there are summit meeting where the heads of government meet to discuss broad matters of European policy. The Member States take it in turn to provide the President of the Council for a six month period. The President is assisted with the day-to-day work of the Council by a committee of permanent representatives known as Coreper. ...read more.


It is the motive power behind EU policy as it proposes policies and presents drafts of legislation to the Council for its consideration. If a Member State fails to implement EU law within its own country, or has violated a Provision in some way, it is the Commission's responsibility to intervene and if necessary, refer the case to the European Court of Justice. The Commission has performed this duty very effectively, which has resulted in judgements given by the court against Britain and other Member States. Another, less important institution of the European Union is the European Parliament or Assembly. The Parliament's main function is to discuss proposals put forward by the Commission, but it has no direct law-making powers. It has standing committees which discuss proposals made by the Commission in more detail and then report to the full Parliament for debate. ...read more.


These too hold office for six years. The ECJ has three main jobs. It hears cases against members states who are not following the EU law. For example, Re Tachnographs - The Commission v. The UK, where the UK was charged with not implementing a directive to install electronic equipment in lorries. If the case cannot go any further in the member states' own court hierarchy, which in Britain is the House of Lords, then the court has to refer the case to the ECJ if it involves EU law. This is known as mandatory referral as they have no choice but to refer it. Because the ECJ has so much work to do, a Court of First Instance was set up in 1988 to deal with some its work. They ensure that laws across the Member States are all in line with EU law and bring the laws up to a certain standard, while the ECJ helps to clarify any problems faced in interpreting EU law. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level European Union section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level European Union essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The European Union and UK Businesses

    3 star(s)

    The metaphor used refers to a TEU made up as a Greek temple sustained by three pillars: The first pillar, the central one, alludes to the Community dimension and comprises the arrangements set out in the EC, ECSC and Euratom Treaties, i.e. Union citizenship, Community policies, Economic and Monetary Union.

  2. How important is the European Parliament?

    Therefore, we can see that although the EP has the opportunity to make significant changes in legislation, the Council can merely ignore the legislation, and the EP has no opportunity to exercise what would otherwise be a considerable power. The EP is imbued with increased powers of scrutinising the Commission and to some extent the Council of Ministers.

  1. Examine the extent to which membership of the European Union has affected the sovereignty ...

    suspend the Merchant Shipping Act 1988 because it conflicted direct with provisions in the Treaty of Rome (1957). The House of Lords obeyed the ruling and in doing so acknowledged the supremacy of the European Court of Justice over Parliament.

  2. can the European Parliament be regarded as an effective legislative

    In the situation where the conciliation committee agrees the legislation, it then has to again be put before Parliament and the council; however it is only parliament that needs the majority vote.

  1. EU functions

    if they cannot agree then the piece of legislation causing quarrels will be passed onto a conciliation committee. Conciliation committee's are built up of an equal amount of members from the council and the parliament. Once the committee is in an agreement the legislation and decision is sent back to


    This prospect of "less eligibility" and Utilitarianism and Malthus pessimistic theory that population would outrun food supplies was undoubtedly used by the royal commission in their recommendations for the new law. During the Napoleonic wars the price of poor relief had been understandably increased to protect the poor in a time of crisis.

  1. What Are The Functions Of The Four EU Institutions? How Are European Laws Made?

    the whole of the EU is split up into constituents, but the European constituents are much larger than the ones used in national elections. Together with the council of ministers, the European parliament makes up the legislative branch of the EU, probably as the EU would need at least one form of democracy in its decisions about EU Laws.

  2. 'Economic Integration within the European Union: Have MNEs driven the Commission's decision to adopt ...

    Solomons (1983, cited by Flower and Ebbers, 2002) lists the advantages of the imposition of uniform standards as: creditability; comparability; and the efficiency of communication. Although these advantages were cited before the decision to adopt IFRS was taken, I believe they are still applicable. In terms of creditability, having more than one set of financial reporting rules means

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work