Cyprus a new member of the European Union, a discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of joining.
Cyprus a new member of the European Union, a discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of joining. Name: Constantinos Stylianides Student no.: 03109693 Module tutor: Richard Haill Date: 14th of June 2004 Word count: 3,253 words Contents PAGE 1. Introduction 3 1.1. Description of Topic 3 1.2. The main sources of investigation 3 1.3. Aims of the Project 3 2. Main Body 4 2.1. Brief history of Cyprus after 1960 4 2.2. The failure of the UN mission in Cyprus 5 2.3. The European Union 5 2.3.1 Application of Cyprus to join the EU 6 2.3.2 Relations between Cyprus and the EU 6 2.4. UN's reunion Plan for Cyprus 7 2.5. Cyprus becomes a Member of the EU 7 2.5.1. Advantages 7 2.5.1.1. Political benefits from the entry to the EU 8 2.5.1.2. Economic advantages of the Membership 9 2.5.2. Disadvantages 0 2.5.2.1. Economic disadvantages 0 2.5.2.2. Political disadvantages 1 2.5.2.3 Social disadvantages 2 3. Conclusion 3 3.1. The, key points of the project 3 3.2. A personal view 3 4. Appendix 4 5. References 7 . Introduction 1.1. Description of the topic Cyprus has always been a part of the European family. The goal of joining the EU is a natural choice for Cyprus. On 1st of May 2004 ten new countries joined the European Union (EU), one of those was Cyprus. Cyprus is very well known because of its problem, with Turkey's invasion
Assess the reasons why Britain's reactions to European co-operation changed in the period 1945-63.
Assess the reasons why Britain's reactions to European co-operation changed in the period 1945-63 In the years after WW2 there was strong opposition in Britain toward possible European integration. Britain had not faced Nazi occupation and still retained her Empire unlike her European ' cousins'. However, by 1961, she was deeply involved in European affairs and organisations. This shift in policy was not a sudden change of thought but a gradual adherence towards European opinion. How did this change come about? Initially, Britain's main resistance to any form of integration within Europe stemmed from two concerns, firstly that it would require power to be handed over to a supra-national organisation, resulting in the loss of her prized national sovereignty. Secondly, fear that such integration had the potential to cut across her economic and political ties with its Empire. The British Empire still stretched across the world and Imperialistic attitudes still remained. At the end of WW2 many still held the view that Britain, and its Empire, could become the 'Third World Power' behind the U.S. and U.S.S.R, whilst at the same time guiding the revival of Europe from ruins to riches in order to contend with the rising force of Communism. As Bevin argued: "Provided we can organize a Western European system ... it should be possible to develop our own power and influence equal to
Ever Closer Union
For over 50 years European nations have been forming an "ever closer union", resulting in the European Union as we know it today. The objectives of the European Union are as follows: * To promote economic and social progress * To assert the identity of the European Union on the international scene * To introduce European citizenship * To develop an area of freedom, security and justice * To maintain and build on established EU law The European Union has only really existed since the early 1990s, although the term has been used for much longer. Milestones on the following page of the major events on the European Union. The Maastricht Treaty renamed the European Community, the European Union by forming what are known as the three pillars of the EU. (The Maastrict Treaty will be talked about in more depth further on) Which are: * European Community * Common Foreign and Security Policy * Justice and Home Affairs The Pillars The first pillar is managed by the institutions of the EU, where as the second and third work through inter-governmental co-operation. The first pillar is responsible for the single market and freedom of movement across borders. It also looks after economic and monetary union and issues such as agriculture, environment and competition. In this pillar, unlike the other two, member states have given up some of their sovereignty and EU
The principal problems membership of the EU has brought to the regions of Britain.
This essay then attempts to highlight some of the principal problems membership of the EU has brought to the regions of Britain and the impact Community policies designed to lessen these problems have had. It also endeavours to show how membership of the EU has affected traditional national government policies implemented to reduce regional disparities. Probably the most significant impact membership of the European Union has had on regional development in the UK is regards a deepening of the north-south divide. Although only politically recognised in the 1980s this divide has a history that stretches back to the original location of major manufacturing activity in the north of the UK. Beginning with the extraction of coal to fuel the industrial revolution, this acted as a catalyst which initiated a process of cumulative causation in northern areas and consequently led to the development of shipbuilding, textile, iron and steel and port-based activities. It was industries such as these that constituted the springboard for British expansion abroad and dominated the functionality of the regions major conurbations (Champion and Townsend, 1990). according to EU sources the south-east recorded a GDP per capita 30 per cent above the EU average in 1988, whilst regions in the north averaged 10 per cent below EU levels (Wise and Gibb, 1993). The recent opening of the Channel Tunnel
Critically analyse the role of NATO in post-Cold war Europe, with special emphasis of the significance of the two rounds of enlargement, including the similarities and differences between them.
Critically analyse the role of NATO in post-Cold war Europe, with special emphasis of the significance of the two rounds of enlargement, including the similarities and differences between them. New World Order? New NATO? It is essential that NATO adjusted itself to new IR realm, where a tiny spark can ignite a global conflict. Therefore it is a global alliance that NATO should become to prolong its existence for next 50 years. To adjust its efficiency, it must enlarge. Four years after accepting new members - Hungary, Czech and Poland - NATO is on a crossroads. There are voices to be heard, louder and louder, that NATO is in crisis and its future seems uncertain. Contrary to what it may seem, it is not a question of internal dispute within the Alliance. During fifty years NATO's existence similar disputes happened quite often. But then, clear framework of Washington Treaty and a common (Soviet) threat were enough of a cure to heal most of them. Now its is different. It is not merely an incidental problem - it has come to question its existence, question the identity and future shape. Warsaw Pact seized to exist, Soviet Union has gone with the wind, communism is no longer a threat to Western Europe, German state is united and democratised. With NATO born in different world, is it still needed? Definitely a 'be or not to be question'... Unfortunately for political alliances,
United Nations: "In Bed With The Devil".
United Nations: "In Bed With The Devil" Every day that goes by, the world remains ignorant of the truth about Serbia, and the conditions that remain in Kosova. Our Collective Inaction leaves the status of our borders, and Mitrovica vulnerable to being changed to the benefit of Serbia, and our inaction greatly impedes the development of a sustainable economy and a viable Kosovar government. When We Become An Independent Country: - There will be no ability by others to change our borders. - The issue of Serbian Reparations for atrocities will be dealt with. - Kosova will be a protectorate, with its own Democratic Government until such time that it becomes fully self-sustaining; governmentally, socially, and economically. - As an independent country, Kosova will develop a military defense force (which a number of western European countries do not want to happen). - The issue of European membership will be addressed. - The European Union cannot stop an independent country from making its own foreign policies, treaties, and establishing economic links with others, such as the United States, Albania, Macedonia and Non-European Union Members. - As an independent country, Kosova has the right to determine its currency, and it could choose other than the Euro, such as the American Dollar, or the British Pound! And these and other choices will be ours, and not determined by
In what ways has the European Union or Japan responded to changes in the wider world through changes in its foreign policy content and management?
In what ways has the European Union or Japan responded to changes in the wider world through changes in its foreign policy content and management? Within this assignment it will assess how the European Unions has responded to the changes in the world overtime, in regards to its security and foreign policy since 1945. With this it will assess what actions the European union takes in terms of military and economic terms as well as find out if a common security policy is possible or are the too many issues regarding sovereignty that acts as constraints limiting its authority. The European Union is a unique development in international relations since the end of World War Two. The European Union has combined the interests of fifteen member states into an international organisation, which has collected the sovereign states in a free market and that of a federal state all in one which look after the protection of world-wide interests such as energy resources, commodity prices, investment security etc. Since the European Economic Community (EEC)/ European Community (EC) / European Union (EU) was founded the member states have tried to use their agreement to benefit one and another by factors like trade. Since the Maastricht treaty (1992) the European Union was created and this cemented a Common Foreign Security Policy from one of the three pillars that created the European
Teaching the History of the Ku Klux Klan
Ku Klux Klan History of the Ku Klux Klan The Ku Klux Klan was established in 1865, after the American civil war, by six ex- soldiers in Pulaski, Tennessee. They were against the rebuilding of the American government and decided they had to protect the white people against the black people. They established a 'klan', a sort of club that is, because they were very bored with having no job. They invented the name Ku Klux Klan by putting the Greek word for circle, 'kuklux', and the word 'klan' together. Kuklux says something about the alliance between the members and Klan, says something about their Irish or Scottish background. They found some followers, although the group remained rather small. This group worked on a very small scale and made only a few attacks on black people. From 1870 onward the KKK started to get a lot more members. The attacks started to happen more frequently and a lot of black people were killed by the Klan. In 1870 for example the KKK tortured 300 black people so badly they couldn't even walk anymore, let alone work. At the end of the 19th century the Klan almost disappeared because of a lot of internal conflicts and fraud. Until then the KKK operated only in the southern states of America. In 1915 the Klan was re-established as 'the knights of the Ku Klux Klan' by William Simmons. This Klan wasn't against blacks alone but also against Jewish
Can the euro challenge the dollar as the world's international currency?
Dima Alexandrov Economics The Euro and the Dollar Can the euro challenge the dollar as the world's international currency? I. Introduction The creation of a single European currency is the most important development in the evolution of the international monetary system since the widespread adoption of flexible exchange rates in the early 1970s. The euro is the first real competitor to the dollar since it surpassed sterling as the world's dominant money during the interwar period. The political impact of the euro is at least as large as these economic effects. A bipolar currency regime dominated by Europe and the United States, with Japan as a junior partner, are going to replace the dollar-centered system that has prevailed for most of this century. A quantum jump in Trans-Atlantic cooperation requires to handle both the transition to the new regime and its longer term prospects. Introduction of the euro has been carefully planned for years, on January 1 of 1999, the euro becomes a reality. Technically, the euro was used since it was launched; it is purely an electronic currency. Therefore, all cash transactions are used by its membership cash. But bank accounts and credit cards may use the euro. Actual minted currency will not be available until January of 2002. Limitation of the essay. In order to justify which currency is strong I have done a lot of researches
Do UK firms benefit overall from membership of EU?
Do UK firms benefit overall from membership of EU? Advantages By being part of the UK firms in the UK get a lot of advantages that firms in other countries don't get. An example of one huge advantage would be the lack of barriers that firms have against them. For instance when a conpany wants to sell its goods to another business in a foreign country in the EU they can do so without having to pay duties or tariffs on the products they are selling. Before January 1st 1993 a lot of the barriers that have now been got rid of were there. That meant that firms used to have to pay extra on top of what it cost to transport the costs. Also being part of the EU has given firms in the UK a lot more customers to sell to. Instead of just having constomers in the UK to sell to being within the EU enables them access into the other countries where they can sell their goods. Another advantage to firms would be that if you want to travel to a different county in the EU to work or live then it is much easier now than it used to be because there is a lot more trust between the countries as a result of the EU and the treaties which each county has agreed to follow. More trading between countries is another result of the barriers which were lifted. More trading means a larger GDP for England and in turn increases the economy benefiting everyone in it. Standards in the EU have been agreed
