• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Have the changes in the powers and influence of the European Parliament over the last ten years exacerbated or rectified the 'democratic deficit' within the EC Legislative System?

Extracts from this document...


Have the changes in the powers and influence of the European Parliament over the last ten years exacerbated or rectified the 'democratic deficit' within the EC Legislative System? The three significant legislative institutions of the European Community can be cited as the Council, Commission and European Parliament. Legislative passage can be achieved by using a variety of procedures. Each of these procedures affords a differing role to the European Parliament and therefore the balance of EP power is never static. Although traditionally, the Parliament had a nominal role in the legislative system, by way of the Consultation procedure, over the last ten years treaties have extended the role of the European Parliament, by the introduction and amending of the Co-decision procedure. Changes over the last ten years now mean the most important legislation is now largely passed via the latter procedure, which has considerable consequences for democracy within the EC legislative system. Although we may comfortably assert that the Co-decision procedure is the primary legislative mode, there are still areas of law making where the European Parliament is not involved at all. Although used cautiously, the Treaty does grant the Commission a power to legislate in some areas, free from intervention from the other institutions. Furthermore, there are a number of areas in which the Council and the Commission are able to operate without any intervention by the European Parliament. The Council will act on a proposal from the Commission and subsequently take the decision in accordance with the particular voting requirement as stipulated in the relevant Treaty Article. ...read more.


Ultimately however, the power and influence of the European Parliament have been increased in the legislative system and this has inevitably led to observations as to the effect these changes have made to the so-called 'democratic deficit'. The 'democratic deficit' was a popular academic theme during the 1990s, expounded particularly by Joseph Weiler in his article "European Democracy and its Critique3". Essentially, Weiler identifies seven elements of the legislative and institutional structure, which evince anti-democratic criteria. However, one could say that the democratic deficit in the system arising from the position and powers of the European Parliament cannot be easily defined, for the interrelations of the various EU bodies creates shifting balances of power which preclude simplistic and generalist assertions about the strength of European democracy. However, the arguments suggesting a deficit will be described but with close regard to the European Parliament. The 'democratic deficit' can be highlighted, one could say in terms of the executive dominance of the EC legislative process. The transfer of competences from member states to the Council and Commission had over time enhanced the executive power of national governments at the expense of their own national parliaments, who no longer had the same level of scrutiny over laws being made. However, more importantly, whilst these EU bodies had their legal powers augmented, neither were directly accountable via suffrage of EU citizens- only the European Parliament can make this claim of legitimate direct mandate. For many years, the legislative system marginalized the European Parliament by way of legislative means such as the 'Consultation' procedure. ...read more.


If we continue to use 'a very specific normative yardstick with which to measure the democratic quality of European policy-making processes'11 then, due to the unique structure of the European Union and therefore its legislative procedure, we are unlikely to ever see the 'democratic deficit' completely rectified or exacerbated. If we adopt Weiler's philosophy we are able to see the democracy deficit of the European Union considerably rectified: the changes in the power and influence of the Parliament have placed the intergovernmental and supranational institutions of the Community on an equal footing that arguably brings into being 'the twofold legitimacy on which the Community is founded, its State and its peoples'12. In this respect the equal position now afforded to the Parliament has bought this twofold legitimacy to the legislative system, and has arguably bought greater democracy to the unique community that is the European Union. 1 EP 'Activity Report for 5th Parliamentary Term' PE 287.644 2 A. Kreppel, 'Moving beyond procedure - An Empirical Analysis of European Parliament Legislative Influence' in Comparative Political Studies Vol. 35 No 7, Sept. 2002 at 786 3 Weiler, Haltern and Mayer from J.Hayward The Crisis of Representation in Europe 4 M.Westlake, A Modern Guide to the European Parliament (Pinter, 1994), 28. 5 Michael Shackleton and Tapio Raunio, 'Codecision since Amsterdam: a laboratory for institutional innovation and change' 6 ibid 7 Michael Shackleton and Tapio Raunio, 'Codecision since Amsterdam: a laboratory for institutional innovation and change' 8 Mancini, 'Europe: The Case for Statehood' 9 Craig & DeBurca EU Law text, cases and materials p.171 10 C&D p.172 11 Adrienne Heritier, 'Elements of democratic ligitimation in Europe: an alternative perspective' 12 C&D p.172 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level European Union section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level European Union essays

  1. The UN is an ineffective Peacekeeper. Discuss

    independence in 1960 and the UN mandate was peacekeeping, therefore it's 10,000 armed troops were merely able to use violence in self defence. The UN's principle of impartiality was compromised by it's refusal to use military power to prevent the Tshombe Government in Katanga who declared independence of this region.

  2. How important is the European Parliament?

    The EP's "nuclear" option is of great importance, as is the public humiliation and internal reprimand of a threat of Commission dismissal. As it is more likely that the EP would want to dismiss an unsuitable Commissioner, as with Buttiglione, than to need to dismiss an entire Commission, some may

  1. Free essay

    Finnish Party System

    Marx and adopted the traditional principles of western social democracy in official party programs. In the long term, the SDP aims for "democratic socialism" and, in the shorter term, developing the welfare state. The SDP has historically advocated three main tenets to develop and support the welfare state: maintaining full employment, securing economic growth, and creating a social security system.

  2. can the European Parliament be regarded as an effective legislative

    One quite major power of the European parliament is 'the EP can formally adopt its own ideas for suggested legislation' (Nugent,2006). The two ways of doing this are, firstly under article 192 the European parliament can request that the commission submit 'any appropriate proposals on matters in which it considers


    The Whigs led By Earl Grey had been elected in 1830 after the collapse of the Tory party. Although the party was aristocratic by nature it was also seen as a reforming and liberal party. For example the reform act in the 1832 gave the middle class the vote and

  2. Is there a democratic deficit in the EU? What are its implications and how ...

    voters generally have a very low knowledge about the European Union and little interest in it. Election turnout for the Union as a whole has dropped to around 45%, hardly enough to claim full democratic legitimacy and turnout, unless compulsory such as in countries like Luxemburg, is lower than at general elections, especially in the UK.

  1. 'Economic Integration within the European Union: Have MNEs driven the Commission's decision to adopt ...

    account, or shown in shareholders' equity, depending on the instrument (Anon, 2004). This is something that has not been required by previous standards and could have a huge impact on banks and financial institutions, particularly due to the change in valuation methods mentioned earlier.

  2. The EU's CFSP and the Iraq Crisis: A Catalyst for Change?

    France and Britain In order for the EU to have a Common Foreign and Security Policy, there needs to be commonality. History has shown this to rarely be the case. This "uncommon" foreign policy is most readily seen in the different perspectives of France and Britain.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work