• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Have village elections democratized rural China?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Have village elections democratized rural China? In order to fully evaluate whether or not village elections have fully democratized rural China, I will begin by looking at why they were initially set up. I will then look at any problems that have occurred whilst implementing village elections, in order to finally conclude whether they have resulted in a democratized rural China. Village elections have evolved from the now defunct commune system, under the commune system only very indirect participation from the village communities was permitted. At this point the villages were being run by dirt emperors whi employed thugs to extort money from farmers. Village elections were thought of at that point in order to put them back under party and state control. The Organic Law of Villagers' Committees was passed by China's National People's Congress in1987 and it was this law that was to begin the process of village elections. The law arrived out of a need to establish a more accountable, responsive structure that would relate to village level and ultimately its aim was to result in a more democratic rural China. One of the main problems with this law was that although it meant that there was a clearer legal basis in place for elections in the villages, the law did not however make village elections compulsory. ...read more.

Middle

They have been able to do this by giving the township officials ultimatums, they either hold an election or the villagers will refuse to abide by the family planning social policy or the grain procurement policy. The fact that the villagers are able to yield an element of power over the township officials may suggest a more democratic country than is true. In fact it is difficult to even know exactly how many people are voting in village elections. The figures released from the government claim that at least 80% of villagers vote, this is in stark contrast with some journalists who estimate only 10% of villagers vote. Any independent studies indicate that at best the percentage voting is 17. Although candidates for election do not have to be approved by the CCP it is unlikely that a candidate who is standing for election and who openly opposes the state will get elected. Corruption and intimidation are things that must be looked at when looking at Chinese politics and village elections are no different. Apparently the CCP have no involvement in the selection of candidates. However there is evidence to the contrary in the village of Liubu in Hebei. ...read more.

Conclusion

It is important that villagers feels that their vote is secret and confidential, a way of ensuring this would be to allow villagers to vote in individual booths or separate rooms, this would increase the number of villagers voting honesty and without fearing intimidation. Another way to improve democracy within villages is to focus on the electoral process being used and also to ensure that local officials are all following the same guidelines and are fully trained. One of the main problems with village elections seems to stem from the fact that they work extremely well in some villages and terribly in others. In some villages elections are held using secret balloting, primaries and open nomination for village committee posts. In othet villages townships and counties have moved to stop farmers from exercising their right to choose village leaders. These are all ways that the village elections in China could be improved, if these ideas are implemented then it is likely that some time in the future we will be able to say that village elections have truly democratized China. It can be argued that China's political system is not and never will be democratic but that the introduction of village elections helps people living in rural areas to have an input into the way in which their villages are run in a more democtaric way. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Power and Politics in Organizations: Public and Private Sector Comparisons

    In the public sphere, however, changing the goals of an organization typically, often instantly, triggers debate over the ends of government because, as I have shown, these ends are what public policies reflect. Debates over such questions immediately bring into play the messiness that leaders of public-sector organizations are called upon to decipher and manage.

  2. Russia's Political Party System as an Obstacle to Democratization

    exert considerable leverage over sufficient numbers of voters to obtain victorv for their candidate. A third factor is that the electoral rules for single-member district races, which give victory to the candidate "first past the post," promote the proliferation of candidates.

  1. Accounts for the changes in voting behaviour in the last 30 years in UK ...

    vote slowly declining; one of the main reasons for this was class de-alignment. There're many factors that are involved with causing class de alignment, changes to the patterns of employment and to the social structure. Sections of the working class, particularly skilled workers in the southern half of the country, became more prosperous.

  2. To what extent do recent elections in the UK and the USA support the ...

    Peele et al. 2002: 20-22) the argument regarding dealignment can be highlighted on the erosion of the 'New Deal Coalition', meaning the voters who where united under Theodore Roosevelt's reforms during the 1930's following the Wall Street Crash and the Great Depression, have become less a part of the effective electorate.

  1. "Enterprise Development and Behavior including Corporate Governance and Restructuring"

    Such theories of political modernization and political development became extremely fashionable in political science in the '50s-70s, and stated that political democracy could be achieved or was becoming stabilized once the country or polity reached a certain level of socio-economic development (Lipset: 1959, Neubauer: 1967, Jackman: 1973).

  2. Analysis of Party Electoral Communications in the 1997 UK General Election.

    Labour of course, won the 1997 election by a landslide using the older system. Several explanations can be given for why people vote the way they do - Issue voting is one example, where people choose their vote based on a policy issue.

  1. Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the system of choosing presidential candidates.

    in 5 turn out, suggesting an element of voter fatigue and disenchantment at the same time as undermining the legitimacy of the process. Many commentators, and indeed Party Leaders, have regarded this development as detrimental to the functioning of the political system.

  2. Communism VS Democracy

    Stalinism, of course, in no way resembled the Communist utopia that Marx and Engels had envisioned. Three decades after Stalin's death, the USSR was still ruled by command, not consent; it was a society administered in authoritarian fashion by a managerial bureaucracy, which in many ways was no less conservative,

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work