• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How did Marx conceive the transition from capitalism to communism?

Extracts from this document...


Modern Political Ideas and Doctrines a) How did Marx conceive the transition from capitalism to communism? Karl Marx is considered to be a historian, a philosopher, a political thinker, and an economist amongst other things. There is a standard misconception that Marx had no idea of economics, by contrast he was quite the economist, and was able to layout the transition of capitalism to communism in a very logical and understanding way. The transition of capitalism arises through three core factors: the philosophy behind the capitalist system, the economic and the political part of it Marx presented the fact that capitalism was doomed, by bringing in history and showing how other systems (such as feudalism) fell. Marx theorized the transition of capitalism to communism, in the same way history showed stage which tribal systems shifted to a feudalist system, and thereafter a feudalist system to a capitalist system. The basics therefore behind his theory of capitalism falling was that everything which starts must end due to changing factor affecting it, and the un flexibility of each system to cope. "Capitalism had to be replaced, according to Marx, because the evolution of society's institutions is a natural and inevitable process of history"1 Firstly Marx outlined the philosophical aspects which outline the transition; Marx believed that every aspect of society could be characterizes as a thesis, whilst its contradictory other characterized as an antithesis. ...read more.


b) How closely did the Soviet experience of "building socialism" conform to Marx's theories? To a great extent the Soviet Union did experience a build of Socialism, which conformed to Marx's theories; these mainly being through the periods of the 1917 revolution, and the period of Leninism. To a great extent however this "building of socialsm" was and is still considered as a charade for historians as it contradicted many aspects of Marx's theories. I will mainly concentrate on Lenin and Stalin*, and on how close they came to building socialism according to Marx. Lenin has been known both for his harsh line when it came to doing work, as well as a major political thinker; characterized often as a man of great intellect. After supervising a successful revolution in 1917, Lenin began building socialism. Lenin tweaked the communist theory before the revolution in order for it to attract the common people; he made use of slogans such as "Peace, Bread and Land", and published "State and Revolution". For this reason he has been portrayed as the father of soviet communism, but was he? To a great extent Lenin persisted, and made it known that the revolution and setting up of socialism was a transitional dictatorship of the workers, until true communism could be achieved. Lenin had to make the theory popular in order for it to gain support from the people. ...read more.


Stalin preferred to take a hard line when he came to power, executing millions of people and sending thousands to the gulags. We can therefore see the rift of Stalinism in accordance to Marx's theories, in the late 1930's when tension surfaced between Germany. Stalin started building upon the foundations of Lenin in completely different manners, making the party more centralized and eliminating even the smallest of enterprises. The rule of Stalin became more totalitarian at the time when it shouldn't have; since socialism was supposed to be a transitional stage inorder to fight off counter-revolutions, since this threat had been almost completely eliminated by Lenin, Stalin still continued with a ruthless approach of building arms, and forming a more high secured secret police. Finally Stalin insisted on state involvement, in many affairs including social, and economical. This building of socialism did not conform to Marx's theories because state involvement was supposed to gradually diminish, whilst under Stalin it was strengthened. In conclusion as time passed and Soviet leaders changed, the building of Socialism started rifting even more and more from Marx's theories. Khrushchev concentrated on the second world war and built the Berlin War, instead of concentrating on building socialism. Whilst Brezhnov and Gorbachov seemed to lose their grip on solidarity within the USSR. Perhaps Lenin must be considered to be the closest in conforming the building of socialism in accordance to Marx; to a great extent Stalin also achieved this, although mainly due to the solidarity he built within the USSR. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. 'Socialists have disagreed on both the means and ends of socialism' - Discuss

    entirely different type of socialism altogether would be achieved through parliamentary means. The less radical form of socialism achieved through democratic means is known as social democracy. Social democracy revises and dilutes many socialist principles, such as its opposition to capitalism - one of the main features of social democracy

  2. Power and Politics in Organizations: Public and Private Sector Comparisons

    This new research can especially be encouraged in such constituent fields of political science as policy studies and public administration, which are already to some degree interdisciplinary and integrated into the literature on organizational theory and organizational learning. But these efforts should not stop there.

  1. Indonesia: Transition and Prospects for Democracy

    On the opposition side, I will examine the emergence of democratic moderates who were stronger than the radical extremists. Finally, I will explain Indonesia's transition by roughly following Huntington' (1991b) "transplacement dialectic": 1. Government liberalization and loss of power and authority 2.

  2. Socialist uses of workers' inquiry

    Have you ever known any rank and file workers who could retire from employment at the age of 50 and live on the money earned by them as wage workers. 80. How many years can a worker of average health be employed in your trade?

  1. Karl Marx was the greatest thinker and philosopher of his time. His views on ...

    (Communist Manifesto, Marx (Francis B. Randal), page 15) Marx was an atheist, and believed that science and philosophy would prove everything. Thus he had no belief in a god of any type. Marx believed that Hegel must have been an atheist as well because of his strong belief in the mind.

  2. Karl Marx - The Greatest thinker and philosopher of his time.

    He took the angle in which most interested him, by saying that there was no way to choose a profession, but because of circumstances one is placed in an occupation. A person with a aristocratic background is more likely to have a higher role in society as apposed to someone from a much poorer background.

  1. M-theory is a solution proposed for the unknown theory of everything

    The incompatibility between quantum mechanics and general relativity Quantum field theory studied on curved (non-Minkowskian) backgrounds has shown that some of the core assumptions of quantum field theory cannot be carried over. In particular, the vacuum, when it exists, is shown to depend on the path of the observer through space-time (see Unruh effect).

  2. T difficult for export orientated economics to sustain the land owning elites much longer. ...

    This strategy would be the pattern of economic development for almost half a century in both countries, but Brazil would manage theirs better and enjoy much greater growth than Argentina during this period. (www.weblinks3.epnet.com.externalframe.pdf. Accessed on 29th January 2005) For ISI to be a successful development model there are three

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work