• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Ideology played relatively small role in the revolutions of 1848" Discuss.

Extracts from this document...


Malgorzata Wojcik "Ideology played relatively small role in the revolutions of 1848" Discuss. Year 1848 is described as "mad year" - mad with fight for freedom. Already its first months, in almost all parts of Europe, brought explosion of aims and aspirations, which were accumulated during the after-congress period. Revolutionary movements spread throughout the whole Europe, apart from Russia, where the system of serfdom did not allow any revolts, and Great Britain, where the reforms were carried out in non-revolutionary channels. Despite the differences in social, economic and political structures of European countries, the revolutions of 1848 were characterised by uniformity, and their ideology was a common denominator. There were several factors that caused the revolutions. Some believe that the main cause of the revolutions of 1848 was bourgeoisie's fight against still existing feudalism. it can be partly true, but this interpretation does not explain all the mechanism of the revolt. First of all - the years of 1845-47, in which an economic crisis occurred. It began with the agriculture problems, which were caused by a poor harvest of potatoes in 1845, followed by crop failure in 1846 and 1847. Agrarian riots occurred in France, there was a "potato revolution" in Berlin, bread-riots in other German cities. Because food prices went up, people stopped buying other goods, and therefore the governments did not have any money to pay off their debts (they borrowed large sums of money for industrial expansion in 1840's). ...read more.


The second part of the revolutions 1848, in which ideology was becoming less and less important, began as the aim of it was partly achived. In most revolutionary countries the constitution was promised, the structure of power and system was on the right way to change. One could say that the revolution was 100% successful. However, change from absolute to constitutional monarchy did not mean that the overall quality of life would improve. So when people did nit get what they expected (especially peasants and artisans), they started to care only about their own interests, forgetting about their primary, noble goal. A great example of it is when the enterprises of the II Republic of France required money, and peasants did not want to pay taxes. Louis Blanc announced nationalization of banks and tax progression, which feared the bourgeoisie. Liberals and radicals decided to organize a demonstration against the Assembly, which led to prohibition of organising gatherings and establishing new clubs. The leaders of the demonstration were also arrested. The decision concerning the national workshops was much more difficult, but as it was no solution to the unemployment, the Assembly decided to close it. As a result, there was an insurrection in Paris (the famous June Days). there were a lot of killed and arrested - the social revolution not only failed, but also led to restriction of benefits of the political revolution. ...read more.


The Frankfurt parliament did not have the future. To sum up, I cannot agree that the ideology of revolutions 1848 played a relatively small role. 'Lamartine describes it as "the product of a moral idea, of a reason, logic and society"'1. At first people were fighting for the ideology, for the liberalism. The idea of equality was strong enough to lead to a revolution on a European scale. What is even more important, they almost achieved their aim. As far as I know, the springtime of peoples was to fail, because too many classes were involved. It is almost impossible to create such a system that would satisfy everybody. However there is an ideology that can unite nations to uprise, which undoubtedly happened in 1848. It is true that in the second and third part of revolutions, the ideology did not play as important role as in the first one, but one has to agree that, although indirectly, it still influenced the events that occurred in that period: a large amount of people were still fighting for liberal monarchy, some cared only about their own interests, which is partly a cause of the failure of 1848. therefore the the significant importance anr role of the ideology should not be declined. Furthermore, the events of Springtime of Peoples 1848 left also something else than only abbolision of feudalism, right to vote in France and constitution in several countries. The revolutions were reminding of heroes, legends, in peoples minds remained the pictures of barricades and fleeing monarchs, and, most importantly, the possibility to choose their representatives. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. This essay is aimed to discuss the meaning of ideology and it different uses ...

    Subsequently the welfare state had to undergo financial cutbacks. Thatcher broke the elusive link between earning and the state pension in order to control public spending. Breaking this link and thereby taking it out of safe hands could be costly to this current generation who have little idea of future pension entitlement, occupational and stakeholder scheme.

  2. Explain why the Liberals were electorally so successful so often, 1868-85?

    Indeed, the party did not survive long; nevertheless they were in power several times and were able to implement crucial policies that were to pave the way for the modernisation of the nation. The political reconstruction implemented by the Liberals, such as over the franchise and ballots gave the electorate

  1. Breaking down the Walls: A Discourse of Ideology and "Otherness"

    This is best shown when, as a young child, Wright can not understand the outrage of the blacks around him concerning the beating of black child at the hands of a white man. Speaking of this occurrence, Wright says, "I felt that the "white" man had had a right to

  2. Why was the Dreyfus Affair so bitterly divisive in France? The Dreyfus Affair began ...

    Were the principles or liberty of an individual, more important than the national unity and security of a country? What began as a question of the guilt or innocence of a French military officer became a much deeper question.33 The Affair became symbol of the fight for "justice and individual

  1. Assess critically Marx's distinction between ideology and science

    atheist no less than the most believing Christian."[5] Living for God or Man are most useless activities, believed Stirner. "... instead of continuing to serve these great egoists, I should rather be an egoist myself!"[6] Bruno Bauer, another Young Hegelian, too, relied on the power of ideas: man, in order

  2. The argument that democracies do not fight one another is a relatively easy

    "As systems, liberal democracies have more in common with science and the market than with undemocratic governments. These similarities explain their peaceful relationships with one another" (diZerega 280). Because democracies are not hierarchically structured, they do not suffer from the problems hierarchical institutions do.

  1. T difficult for export orientated economics to sustain the land owning elites much longer. ...

    In Argentina in 1943 Peron was just beginning to lay the foundation for his type of populism following a military coup, the result of this was that for the first time Argentina could be described as being authoritarian. As Minister of Labour Peron used his position to organise support of

  2. Russia's Political Party System as an Obstacle to Democratization

    First, Putin was the "party of power's" candidate. He had the same resources, media advantages, and regional support as the Unity Party, he conveyed much the same vague nonspecific message as Unity, and he benefited considerably from the Unity Party's victory over Primakov. Like Yeltsin, however, Putin did not run as a party candidate but remained above party competition.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work