• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is Britain an elective dictatorship?

Extracts from this document...


Is Britain an elective dictatorship? Lord Hailsham suggested the phrase elective dictatorship in his academic paper written in 1976. Elective dictatorship refers to the fusion of powers of the executive and the legislature; where the legislature is drawn from the executive therefore resulting in dominance of the executive over the legislature. Firstly the executive's majority in the House of Commons reinforces the executives dominance. Elective dictatorship occurs in conjunction with this situation and that of the governing party, the executive. The party in power will by definition have more seats, i.e. more voting power than all the opposition parties. This means that any legislation or motion proposed by the governing party could be passed unless government MPs dissents, because only a simple majority is required. Due to the strength of the whip system to prevent MPs of the governing party voting against it, in practice government bills are extremely rarely defeated in the House of Commons. The government proposes usually around 95% of the bills passed. ...read more.


Firstly this is seen by the relationship between the cabinet and the Prime Minister. Tony Blair's period as Prime Minister since 1997 has stimulated renewed debate about the location of power within the executive and the relationship between the Prime Minister and the cabinet. Blair's presidential style is reflected in his cabinet management. The meetings are short, and are held less frequently. The Prime Minister dominates executive decision, making key decisions without consulting the cabinet. For example an " Elective Dictatorship" meant Tony Blair was still able to proceed with the Iraq war even though most of his cabinet disagreed with him, and two of his cabinet ministers, Robin Cook and Claire Short resigned. However critics can also say that a Prime Ministerial style government has been around before Blair. Margaret Thatcher also had a Prime Ministerial style government for example she went against most of her cabinet in key decisions for example her decision for poll tax. Therefore Britain can be said to have had a "Elective Dictatorship" before the Blair government. ...read more.


When a vote of no confidence is passed in Parliament, every minister and government official drawn from Parliament automatically resign in their role as the executive, the entire executive is dismissed. Even though the powers of the House of Lords is restricted they are still able to act as a check on the executive. This is because they are still involved in the process of legislation. The house of lords has the power to amend and reject bills and also the House of Lords are able to delay bills. The power of the executive has grown and the checks are in place to prevent abuse of this power. It is important for the legislature to keep a watch on the executive so the control is maintained and it does not slip into a dictatorship. These checks mean that Britain is not theoretically an " Elective Dictatorship", as rules still exist which means the executive can not have a dictatorial role. Britain currently is not an " Elective Dictatorship", as the Parliament still has some effectiveness in scrutinising the executive, however as Britain is falling more into a Prime-ministerial style government there is possibility that Britain can become an "Elective Dictatorship." ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United Kingdom section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United Kingdom essays

  1. priministers power

    Rhodri Morgan's leadership in Wales * Political opposition - particularly from the rural population and from a more assertive House of Lords * Bad luck - the foot and mouth disaster, compounded by vascilating policy * Criticism from people and organisations usually sympathetic to Labour, for example the trade unions

  2. How effective is Parliament as a check on the executive?

    However, there are several instances in which Parliament is still an effective body in relation to the executive. For example, the Government can only govern the country because Parliament says it can. Governments are only able to govern because they have support from Parliament - Parliament sustains the government.

  1. Arguments that the British Prime Minister is an elective dictator are arrant nonsense. The ...

    An example of conflict between the judiciary and the executive is in the case of M v Home Office [1994] 1 AC 377; QB 270. In this case it was held that "ministers and civil servants were subject to contempt jurisdiction of the courts and that the Home Secretary was in contempt when he disobeyed a judge's order"13.

  2. New Britain. Now: TV Network Studio.

    What I am to announce here today is not just about what happened to my wife. But it is however, the last straw for me. Frankly, I fear greatly for our nation. What will become of our great nation in 20 years time?

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work