• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Participation is the essence of democracy Discuss

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Government & Politics Essay: Participation is the essence of democracy Teacher: Ms S Lightbowne Student: Kamahl Brown 12FXL ________________ ?Participation is the essence of democracy? Discuss For many years and even centuries one of the main discussions that have been very dominant is the ?right to vote.? The right to vote is a phrase that has been in headlines for many centuries to give countries more of a democracy. The United States, Women across the world and many minorities had to fight and millions died in the process to fight for their right to vote. However, is voting the essence of democracy or is voting an overrated task? Is participation of the people needed to make a democracy? Democracy means the right to vote, it doesn?t mean that you have to vote, if no one votes then it?s a democracy because it shows that no one are interest on how the country is ran so the previous government that was voted by the people, will carry on making the decision. In the United Kingdom, if you are over the age of 18 and you do not have a criminal record, you are allowed to vote. If you are ill and you want someone else to vote on your behalf, that vote will be rejected. ...read more.

Middle

To interpret what Burke was saying, is that if citizens leave their trust into the governments? hand, then evil will prevail. What he is trying to promote is a fairer world but with the input of the people. Burke?s main influences in life were religion as both of his parents were strong believers. Burke wanted to widen out the political participation as he wanted to defend the independence of the House of Commons as he opposed the King George III attempts to regain some of the prerogatives that the monarchy had lost in the Glorious Revolution of 1689. (UK Political, General Election Turnout 1945-2010) As you can see from this graph, the turnout has dropped down significantly. The main reason is disenchantment. Many voters lose faith and trust in those who are in government. As you can analyse in 1950 it was the highest turnout. The Second World War finished 5 years before and the people wanted to be in a society where they were confortable and safe. Though there has been a few upwards growth for example in 1979 when the first female was running to be Prime Minister and Margarat Thatcher won the peoples vote. The biggest dip was between 1997 and 2007. The Electoral Voter Commission stated that the reason why the turnout was a lot of 18-24 year olds did not vote. ...read more.

Conclusion

The middle class votes Conservatives and working class votes Labour), another is the rational choice theory (Himmelweit at al 1981 said that citizens vote due to the performance of the previous administration and how it?ll effect their or their families goals, the last and final theory is the Dominant Ideology Theory (Dunleavy and Husbands 1985 argues that people vote due to the mass media and the misrepresentation). These theories suggest that we as the people have created competition, security and democracy. The UK leads by example because if people do not participate as citizens of a country, the citizens would be more of a dictatorship. John Prescott wanted devolution for the South East; however they voted against it by a milestone. This is the essence for democracy. In my opinion I believe that if someone doesn?t want to vote or participate because of the lack of trust or because of financial issues then they shouldn?t, why should someone vote for a party or become a member of a party if they are not fulfilling their promises? However, I do believe that if a high proportion of the population do not vote then democracy will not take place because it is not a representative of the whole country. AS Government & Politics ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Power and Politics in Organizations: Public and Private Sector Comparisons

    The strongest indicator of this reduction is the empowerment of the periphery not only to make policies but also to tax or otherwise raise capital in connection with these policies. Such transfers, in turn, encourage high levels of competition between the subnational units of federal systems, sometimes creating very difficult problems at the center.

  2. Iran Country Study

    There have been many calls for Iran to stand up for itself in the face of the United States and the West, which came after the election of President Ahmadinejad. This represents the democratic process and provocative feedback mechanism in Iran's political process.

  1. Indonesia: Transition and Prospects for Democracy

    The democratic and moderate opposition such as the PDI-P and Democratic Party (PD) led by Yudhoyono do not engage in violence, making them credible political partners. Rise of opposition It was government policy that led to the growth of the opposition.

  2. What are the dilemmas of a pluralist democracy?

    According to Harrington (Kelso p.3) pluralism caters more for pressure groups than the individual; the welfare of the larger public will therefore suffer as a result. Similarly there is a large risk that the pressure group itself is undemocratic, exerting its pluralistic power according to a system that does not take account of the majority of its members.

  1. Compare and contrast Pluralist and Ruling Elite accounts of political power.

    Unlike this pyramid of classes almost like the feudal system of the Middle Ages, pluralist states are structured so that anyone can rise to positions of political influence due to the plurality of political resources. In different "pluralist states" the government works with the people in different ways.

  2. Can a plausible case be made for participatory democracy under modern conditions?

    It seems, in fact, far more plausible a suggestion that such a term as 'common good' will have different meanings for different people depending on their world view or ethical outlooks and, therefore, it seems there will be no objective, unequivocal meaning of such a term.

  1. Russia's Political Party System as an Obstacle to Democratization

    Critics of this view (Miller and Klobucar 2000; Miller et al 2000; Brader and Tucker 2001) argue that voters are able to differentiate parties by ideology and identify the party closest to their own position. But how significant can this be when so many parties are short-lived?

  2. British Democracy - the bestpossible system of government

    lead to a fairer government, but as past examples such as the Weimar Republic have shown, proportional representation is not without its problems, the result of smaller parties gaining seats is that in order to gain a majority the larger parties must form a coalition government with the smaller.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work