Sources A-D are all responses to the Law of Return (1949). Why do they give such different interpretations on the aims and intentions of the Law?

Source B is written by an Israeli politician and has aimed his/her speech to the Ministry of Foreign affairs I will expect the Israeli politician be for the law of return as he/she is also a Jew himself/herself. The politician states basically what the law is about which is intended for the repartition of the Jewish people to the Jewish state. The politician has only stated the fact of the rule so conflict about it will not increase as it already has. The politician also attempts to clarify to the Arabs that their argument of the law being unfair has no basis to it which basically means they don't have a right to complain, he/she is more for the law but is also stating that they know about the complaints but there are no basis. The Arabs do not agree with the politicians statement as they find it unfair that they are being kicked out of their homes and becoming refugees although the United Nations probably knew this would happen they did not think the circumstances of the law of return through

Source C is written in an Arab newspaper by an Arab journalist for the Arab public, I feel that the journalist will be against the law of return. The source is against the law of return and is stated to be unfair to the Arab population, poor conditions for refugees, the journalist wants people to help 'his people' he/she uses statistics like 935,000 as it's a trick to make the reader actually believe that 935,000 Arabs were kicked out of 530 towns, the Arab journalist is complaining that Jew's have insured Israel as their second homeland even if they are American-Jews they are welcome to Israel. The Arab journalist is keen to talk about how 'his people' are becoming refugees but does not state about Jews how many people are living as Refugees this article is a biased account and probably only Arabs will agree with it as it is aimed for the Arab Audience, the Jews will disagree with this argument as they feel that God's promise through Abraham to them has come true.

The Final source, Source D is a demonstration or petition on the united nations decision it is a picture of two women, an Arab and an American-Jew it is aimed at the United Nations. The source shows how the united nations did not properly think before they acted and should have only allowed Jews who were born in Palestine back into Palestine instead of American Jews who are born in the United States of America. If I saw this I will personally feel sorry for the Arab as she was kicked out of Palestine and was born in Jerusalem but is not allowed to return there where as the America Jew has a chance to Return to Palestine whenever she wants too.

All of these sources talk about the law of return on two accounts (Source C and B) they are promoting what people want to hear so they will not loose their job so the public will not despise them for expressing their opinion these Sources both have similar answers to them but the other way around. I personally think that the Law of Return was not thought out properly by the United Nations as they were letting any type of Jew into Palestine to make it a sort of second homeland if someone goes wrong in their which is unfair. They should have allowed ONLY people who were born in Palestine into the country so less Arabs would have been removed from their own homes and they would not have to live in refugee camps. Source D I feel is a good source as it is showing how people are coping with the Law of return and since it was aimed at the United Nations themselves they could see what mistakes they had made about the law.