• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The article America and Venezuela: Constitutional Worlds Apart compares and contrasts the similar yet polar opposite differences in the constitutional laws of the United States and Venezuela.

Extracts from this document...


The article America and Venezuela: Constitutional Worlds Apart compares and contrasts the similar yet polar opposite differences in the constitutional laws of the United States and Venezuela. Based on the facts presented in this article, I would have to agree that Venezuela is making tremendous progress in transforming and carrying out their constitutional laws, while the United States has for the most part remained the same since the establishment of the constitution. Although no country is perfect, the reality is that America endured plenty of issues throughout the presidency of former president George W. Bush as he portrayed all signs of corrupt laws. On the other hand, Venezuela's President Hugo Rafael Chavez Frias continues to better his country and has transformed Venezuela to what appears to be as close to a model democracy as a country can get. This is not to say that Venezuela is a "better" country rather that its strong leadership is carried out by a man who genuinely cares and acts on the peoples interests. ...read more.


Prior to his election into office, Venezuela was an extremely corrupt country where the people didn't seem to have much say about anything at all. Immediately upon his election into presidency, Chavez held a national referendum in which his people had the opportunity to decide if they wanted to draft a new constitution that would be based around his image of what he wanted the country to be like. In December of 1999 the new constitution passed under his rule which tremendously improved and continues to improve everything for the country of Venezuela. The differences in the way in which the "constitutional" laws are carried out between the two countries couldn't be more different. The United States government is comprised of three branches: the Legislative, Judicial, and Executive branches of government while Venezuela's is comprised of the Legislative branch, the Office of the President, and the Judicial System of government. ...read more.


Lastly, the United States Judicial branch of government (Supreme Court) comprised of the Circuit Court of Appeals which has twelve courts throughout the United States, and the District Courts (91 trial courts throughout the U.S.) Venezuela's judicial branch is a work in progress due to its corruption before Chavez came into office. The many variations between the two systems lead me to believe that the Venezuelan government is a true model democracy because while the United States has remained the same since the creation of the constitution, Venezuela has shown significant progress in making alterations to their constitution by continuing to work on making their country better literally for and by the people. The fact that Chavez got his citizens involved (and kept them involved) in these changes right away makes it a democracy in it of itself. The American governments' main interest is focused and based off of white male property owners and the constitution wasn't written to better anybody other than the people that fit into that category, while Venezuela rewrote their laws to benefit their people. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United States section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United States essays

  1. Are gun control laws popular in the United States?

    During the 2008 election campaign Republican runner John McCain argued that guns should be made safer, and cheaper models should be restricted, arguing they're not as reliable. McCain declared he did not own a hand gun, yet knew how to use one, in vast contrast to this statement McCain's running

  2. To what extent is it fair to say America is a land of 100 ...

    This may seem commendable but it actually resulted in the election of a party even further from its own stance and a President that was not interested in signing up to any world climate change accords. Some independent parties have been around for some time, the Libertarian party was founded


    laws that are necessary and proper for carrying out the enumerated powers, hence later the Supreme Court agreed that the enumerated power of coining money gave the federal government the implied power to set up banks in America.

  2. Federalism in the United States.

    This obviously angered FDR who took the chance to re appoint judges who took his point of view and so the controversy over the matter grew as it became partizan and party politics took over. Although FDR didn't get his plans passed, two judges (Justice Roberts and Chief Justice Hughes)

  1. The paradox of power in the United States constitution.

    The Constitution can be interpreted to give the federal government a large amount of power as easily as it can be read to allot the states the primary bulk of power. While both the state power and federal power are outlined, the boundaries which each inhabit are not.

  2. The Separation of Church and State in America.

    ?Women who use contraception are generally healthier, better educated, more empowered in their households and communities and more economically productive. Women?s increased labor-force participation boosts nations? economies? (UN representative, http://thinkprogress.org/health/2012/11/14/1189161/un-contraception-human-right/?mobile=nc). The use and availability of birth control is not only beneficial to women individuality but society as a whole will benefit from the availability of contraceptives.

  1. Power in America. The idea that the rich run America has been encompassed in ...

    Therefore, it is evident that big business is in a good position to control political processes. According to Domhoff, "in terms of access, expertise, and sheer number of appointments, corporate involvement in the shaping of government policy is extensive". Corporate power is strong in America because money is needed for the most political policies to be carried out.

  2. How effectively does Congress fulfil its constitutional roles

    1995 of the Clinton administration where the government had to shut down due to delays and lack of agreement, therefore Congress can be seen as ineffective in this role. It can also be said once again that a united government will produce a more effective money bill, and a divided government will make things more difficult for an effective bill.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work