• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Common Agricultural Policy.

Extracts from this document...


The Common Agricultural Policy Virtually all governments intervene in their country's agricultural markets in an attempt to alter or regulate the production and trade of products. Governments often view agriculture as a 'special' sector worthy of their intervention. Indeed, interventionists argue that there is a need to stabilize agricultural prices to protect the consumer, create a certain amount of self-sufficiency within a country, and improve efficiency and productivity in the agricultural business. One of the largest examples of intervention in the agricultural sector is the Common Agricultural Policy, which is co-ordinated by the European Commission. The Common Agricultural Policy was proposed in 1960 by the six members of the European Economic Community, but only came into effect in January. It was introduced at a time of great food shortages, which resulted in a large percentage of food being imported. The Common Agricultural Policy had many aims. These included: * Increasing agricultural productivity by promoting technical progress and ensuring the rational development of agricultural production and the optimum utilisation of the factors of production, in particular labour. * Ensuring a fair standard of living for the agricultural community, in particular by increasing the individual earnings of persons engaged in agriculture. * Stabilising markets * Ensuring the availability of supplies. * Ensuring that supplies reach the consumers at reasonable prices. For the main agricultural products the system works in the following way. Each year the council of Ministers sets a target price for the product for the next agricultural year (April to March). ...read more.


Consumers lost out in two ways. First, they had to pay directly for food, which was much higher in price, than it would otherwise have been if it had been bought on world markets. Second, as taxpayers they had to pay for the heavy costs of running the CAP. In theory, he CAP should have been fairly inexpensive to run. If there was a glut of produce on the market in one season, the EU would buy some of it at the intervention price and store it. The next season, when there was perhaps a shortage, the EU could take the produce out of storage and sell it. Prices would not fluctuate by as much as under a market system and the sale of produce would ensure that the major cost of the system would be administration and storage. In practice the cost of CAP rose year after year. This was due to the CAP agencies buying more than they were selling. The CAP resulted in considerable excess of many agricultural products. The longer-term effects on supply magnify the problem. As producers are now faced with a guaranteed demand for their products, there is every incentive to produce more. This is exactly what happened in Europe during the 1970s and 1980s. Producers began to increase their levels of production of agricultural products, which led to the accumulation of large surpluses of certain farm products. These surpluses are expensive to store and export, and if they are sold abroad at relatively low prices, they tend to lower world prices and hence reduce the incomes of producers in other countries. ...read more.


In particular a quota system for milk was imposed. Each farm in the EU was given a milk quota based on existing production levels minus a given percentage to reduce the milk surplus, which had developed. This is demonstrated in the diagram below. A quota at output level Q2 restricts the supply of milk. This reduces the excess supply from a level of Q3 - Q1 to a smaller level of Q2-Q1, therefore reducing the expenditure under CAP. The financial crisis worsened despite this and in 1987 Cap was forced to transfer some spending over into 1988 because it had run out of money in its budget. This led to the member countries agreeing to an increase in spending on CAP. In 1980s there was a general agreement that the CAP should be reformed further. The reforms since 1985 have tended to tackle the outcomes rather than the root cause of the problem. The root cause of the problem was that agricultural prices had been set too high in relation to the world price. Too high prices encourage farmers to produce too much and discourage consumption. Surpluses have to be disposed of, sometimes onto world markets at knock down prices, which angers farmers in other countries who complain on 'unfair competition'. The reforms have concentrated on restricting supply rather than reducing prices. This had consequently not been successful. The MacSharry reforms aimed to lower agricultural prices to levels, which were more in line with world prices. This was one of the only reforms, which had proved successful. This was hopefully the end to large surpluses. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level European Union section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level European Union essays

  1. A clear explanation of key underpinning economic theories relevant to the EU.

    It will cost Boots approxmently 40 million in preparations for the euro, this 40 million will be used to update systems and get the company ready for the euro. Benefits to Boots will be less conversion costs, suppliers more like to trade as same currency.

  2. The EU's CFSP and the Iraq Crisis: A Catalyst for Change?

    Although the constitution would eventually fail to be ratified, it proposed several important changes to CFSP which represent a desire for greater cooperation. Of notable significance are the proposals to upgrade the High Representative of CFSP to that of EU Minister of Foreign Affairs, and the proposal to create a European External Action service to manage EU diplomatic affairs.

  1. EU actorness in relation to Environment policy and Development policy: An evaluation.

    recent years it has been given the opportunity to involve itself in other aspects of global politics for example the recent disagreements with the USA about the impacts of global warming have left the door open for the European Union to take on the role of environmental protector.

  2. Economic and political integration between the member states of the European Union means that ...

    These countries should join the EU sometime in 2004. Bulgaria and Romania expect to follow a few years later around 2007 and Turkey is also a candidate country who will discuss further negotiations after December 2004 about the political conditions that are not met yet.


    The seller should "make clear the procedure that must be followed before the contract is formed" (Elborne 2000). The acceptance of the offeree is very important because without acceptance there is no contract. In UK, the contract is formed when the supplier receive the acceptance.

  2. Common Agricultural Policy

    Instruments The CAP is an integrated system of measures which works by maintaining commodity price levels within the EU and by subsidising production. There are three principal mechanisms: * Import Tariffs are applied to specified goods imported into the EU.

  1. In 1957 the Common

    an amount of critisim as well as putting a strain on the E.U budget. Farmers will only get a market within the E.U for their goods if the prices set by the commission compete with global prices otherwise consumers will import goods and if this happens the E.

  2. Regulation 2560/2001 on cross-border payments in Europe.

    STEP1 and STEP2 work in a similar fashion, except that orders are batched and processed on a predetermined time. Furthermore, banks participating in STEP1 and STEP2 are not allowed to have debit position. Although there is no official limit on transfer size, usually size is below � 50,000.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work