• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Common Agricultural Policy.

Extracts from this document...


The Common Agricultural Policy 1) The 5 objectives of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) set out in Article 39 of the Treaty of Rome were: * To increase agricultural productivity * To ensure a fair standard of living for farmers * To stabilise markets * To guarantee availability of supplies * To ensure fair prices for consumers 2) An intervention price is a price at which the EU/government will buy produce from the producer. It is a fixed price, and it is the minimum price that the producer will get for their goods. In this case, the EU established an intervention price at which it would buy the produce from the farmers. As a result the farmers could either choose to sell their produce on the open market or sell it to the EU for the minimum fixed price. As a result of the intervention price scheme farmers increased their production - knowing that no matter how much they produced, the EU would buy it. Naturally supply began to outstrip demand. Instead of the EU selling the produce produced by the farmers, they have stored them in large warehouses and as a result the infamous lakes and mountains have developed. This excess produce then had to be sold, often at a fraction of the cost of production, and some was even destroyed. ...read more.


As a result, many farmers would go bankrupt and many jobs would be lost in the countryside. Consequently there would be mass rural-to-urban migration causing major depopulation in the countryside. As a result the countryside would deteriorate and taxpayers would lose out, as they would have to pay for the rejuvenation of the countryside. This is an argument from farmers who are reluctant for reform. Also, many farmers in Spain, Italy and France are against reform as they are the main beneficiaries from the CAP. In fact many of farmers are against CAP reform, as they would stand to lose a lot if it was reformed - and so through their own greed they oppose the notion of reforming the CAP. 6) If the EU was enlarged, then this would have a major impact on the CAP. This is because a large of majority of the members would be from Eastern Europe. And so, hypothetically, 10 new member states from Eastern Europe - most with large, poor agricultural sectors would qualify for billions of euros in subsidies under an unreformed CAP. These countries have a greater dependency on farming as a source of income and jobs. Many of the farms in these countries are much smaller and poorer than their Western European counterparts - a major problem given the bias within the CAP to offer disproportionately more financial support to larger more efficient farms. ...read more.


The effects of reform in the short to medium term will vary from nation to nation within the EU and there are likely to be significant regional implications for individual countries. Some of the main issues to consider are as follows: Will reductions in direct payments for production stimulate increases in farm productivity arising from a switch to larger-scale production? Will reforms to the CAP stimulate improvements in the efficiency of the UK and European farming industry? Supporters of reform believe that cutting dependency on financial support will encourage farmers to diversify the use of their land including breaking into rural tourism and focusing resources on supplying niche products to local markets. Will there be sufficient geographical and occupational mobility in the farming industry to offset many of the likely tensions and problems that structural change will cause? The main risk is a sharp rise in structural unemployment and associated problems of rural poverty. That said, the British farming industry has suffered greatly in recent years even without fundamental reforms to the CAP. Will there be massed forced sales of land leading to a collapse in farm land prices? And, how will smaller farms survive? Should governments target financial assistance on poorer farmers? All these problems and more need to be considered and then reform can take place for a better and more successful CAP. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level European Union section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level European Union essays

  1. A clear explanation of key underpinning economic theories relevant to the EU.

    Attitudes and values, are different in some countries in relation to matters such as time keeping and appointments. Attitudes and values differ from countries to countries, it might be considered rude to question elders but in some acceptable. Religion, this is very important to a lot of individuals, such matters

  2. The EU automotive industry currently faces a number of issues. It lags behind the ...

    This was set at 48 hours due to health and safety regulations, however there were agreements called "opt-outs" which workers could sign to be able to work more than 48 hours (in certain circumstances). Due to this restriction on man hours, companies would have to structure their staff so as to optimize their workforce to be more efficient.

  1. EU actorness in relation to Environment policy and Development policy: An evaluation.

    Coherence- this is based on the ability of the internal institutions to act together. In most areas the supranational institutions of the union are able to work along side each other, each with their own specific tasks but it s not always possible.

  2. Economic and political integration between the member states of the European Union means that ...

    functioning market economy as well as the capacity to cope with competitive pressure and market forces within the Union; * The ability to take on the obligations of membership including devotion to the aims of political, economic and monetary union.

  1. Common Agricultural Policy

    This applies to some countries which had a traditional trade link with a member country. An obstacle to Community trade is the diversity of national laws regarding production or trade. Examples are the use of preservatives, coloring agents, hormones and disease control (e.g.during the foot and mouth disease outbreak in the United Kingdom, Ireland and the Netherlands).

  2. In 1957 the Common

    U will put tariffs on goods imported into the E.U. this has caused a trading War between Europe and the U.S.A. On the onset the Common Agricultural policy was seen to be a competition between the two industrial leaders of the E.U, France and Germany, France whose agricultural sector accounted

  1. Regulation 2560/2001 on cross-border payments in Europe.

    granted a period of transition of two and a half years so that it actually came into force in July 2003. The case against the regulation Of course, the main adversaries of Regulation 2560/2001 are the banks, since they can now not fully exploit their monopoly position on cross-border payments anymore (The Economist, 2002).

  2. Sustainable development or fish eat fish world? 'EU external trade policy'.

    - have collapsed in late 199813, the EC instantly switched its focus to the WTO. The recent "EU" international agreements have been characterized as multi-pillar and multi-faceted agreements. They contain subjects within all three pillars of the EU and concern many different facets of the specific fields.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work