• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17

The Euro

Extracts from this document...


INTRODUCTION In today's world of advanced Business, Finance and marketing, the measure of success is the ability to sustain deterrents and reversals as a part of life and resolving it in a competitive and innovative way. National currencies are vitally important to the way modern economies operate. They allow us to consistently express the value of an item across borders of countries, oceans, and cultures. Wealth can be easily stored or transported as currency. Currencies are also deeply embedded in our cultures and our psyche. Think about how familiar you are with the price of things. If you've grown up in the United States, you think of everything in "dollars," just like you think about distances in inches and miles. On January 1, 2002, the Euro became the single currency of 12 member states of the European Union. This will make it the second largest currency in the world (the U.S. dollar being the largest). It will also be the largest currency event in the history of the world. Twelve national currencies will evaporate and be replaced by the euro. The Euro since it's very inception has become a competitor for being one of the leading currencies in the world. Not only has the Euro lent economic stability to these countries but also it has widened new horizons and has shown these countries that, not everything is lost yet, a new day has begun with hope and brightness ahead. EURO DESIGN The European Commission (EC) was given the responsibility of developing euro symbol as part of its communications work. The three essential things the design had to accomplish were: * It should be easily recognized. * It should be easily written by hand. * It should have pleasing look. There were more then 30 designs drawn up by the EC. Out of these 30 designs, 10 were selected and finally these 10 were narrowed down to two when the public was asked to give in their respective votes for it. ...read more.


The ECB used guidelines established in a Joint Communiqu� that was issued on May 2, 1998, by the ministers of the member states who were adopting the euro. In order not to amend the external value of the European Currency Unit (ECU), they used the bilateral rates of the Exchange Rate Mechanism (ERM) to establish the fixed conversion rate for each national currency. The calculation of the exchange rates followed the regular daily concertation method, which used the representative exchange rate for each nation's currency against the U.S. dollar as of December 31, 1998. Exchange Rate Mechanism (ERM) The ERM links currencies of non-participating countries to the euro as of January 1, 1999, as they stood on the first day of stage three of the changeover. It uses fluctuations of plus or minus 15 percent as the basic rule. European Currency Unit (ECU) This refers to the basket currency that was made up of the weighted value of each of the 12 member states national currencies as of the signing of the Maastricht Treaty in February 1992. The ECU was replaced by the euro on January 1, 1999. The initial value of the euro was 1-to-1 with the ECU. Here are the recognized values. One-Euro Equals: Belgian franc 40.3399 Italian lira 1936.27 Greek drachma 340.750 Dutch guilder 2.20371 French franc 6.55957 Deutsche mark 1.95583 Portuguese escudo 200.482 Spanish peseta 166.386 Irish punt 0.787564 Luxembourg franc 40.3399 Austrian schilling 13.7603 Finnish markka 5.94573 WHERE THERE IS A WILL THERE IS A WAY On January 1, 1999, the euro was established as the official currency of the 12 participating member states of the European Union. The conversion rates were "irrevocably fixed," and the euro officially "existed." At that point, the euro could be used for non-cash transactions, such as making electronic payments, writing checks, or credit transactions. In majority of cases the balances were shown both in the national currency as well as in the converted euro amounts. ...read more.


It was very successful, but just as with the ECSC; it served more of a peacemaking role between the European nations than an economic role. At that time the monetary exchange rate between countries was controlled by the Bretton Woods system, which connected currencies to the U.S. dollar, allowing for only a one-point variation around designated values. This was referred to as the "pegged rate" and was based partly on the gold backing of the dollar. This system worked well for 20 years, helping to stabilize exchange rates and restore economic growth in the postwar period. By 1960, however the structure began to fail and exchange-rate agreements became the prevalent topic among European political and economic leaders. By December 1969, Luxembourg's Prime Minister, Pierre Werner, was asked to write an EC (European Community) report covering the need for a complete monetary union among the European economies. The Werner Report came out in 1970 and specifically brought up the idea of a single European currency as part of a cooperative monetary effort. The report was the first to use the term Economic and Monetary Union. Although this plan seemed promising, it lost momentum when President Nixon's 1971 policy of "benign neglect" ended U.S. backing (by its gold reserves) of the predefined exchange rates against the dollar, collapsing the Bretton Woods system. Other overseas central banks were not willing to support the dollar, which would have provided the equivalent of deposit insurance. So where did that leave the European countries when it came to the stability of their currencies? It brought about the development in 1979 of the European Monetary System (EMS), which locked exchange rates among the participating countries into predefined trading zones. This was known as the Exchange Rate Mechanism (EMS). This move, in itself, stabilized the economy by creating predictable trading zones. The next move toward a unified European economy came with the 1987 Single European Act. This act called for the systematic removal of barriers and restrictions that hampered trade between European countries. As a result, border checks, tariffs, customs, labor restrictions and other barriers to free trade were dismantled. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level European Union section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level European Union essays

  1. A clear explanation of key underpinning economic theories relevant to the EU.

    Simply companies in an oligopoly Market could join with competitors and fix price so increased profits can be made. Cartels are introduced to challenge these practices so consumers will not be exploited. Competition policy can affect a business; there are many benefits of this policy as well as there being impacts.

  2. Why are developing countries unhappy with the global arrangements under the Bretton Woods system?

    expansion and balanced growth of international trade, and to contribute thereby to the promotion and maintenance of high levels of employment and real income' (Riesenhuber, 2001:4). It is also to promote exchange stability, and to maintain orderly exchange arrangements among the members, and to avoid competitive exchange depreciation (Tew, 2003:70).

  1. Free essay

    Assymetric shocks

    The main point of concern is that the European Union might not be an "optimum currency area" (OCA)6 and a very serious issue arising from this critique is the fear for AS. Four distinctions are made between: (Patterson, B. (1998)

  2. Transformation of the U.S. Hegemony in Europe through NATO after the Cold War

    For U.S., the division of labor was not clear enough. For example the idea of handing over an operation to NATO that was started by Rapid Reaction Force of EU, if the circumstances of the operation necessitate such an action, was a question mark.

  1. The question of whether Britain should gravitate toward adopting the euro is indeed an ...

    Greece joined on January 1, 2002 bringing the Member States total to twelve. These twelve Member States introduced the new euro banknotes and coins at the beginning of that same year. There were strict criteria for joining the Euro Zone, including targets for inflation, interest rates and budget deficits.

  2. Economic and political integration between the member states of the European Union means that ...

    The EIB has legal personality and is financially independent. Its members are the Member States of the Union, and it has its headquarters in Luxembourg. In 1997, it granted loans totalling 26.2 billion, by confirming its position as a leading international financial institution. The priority objective of the EIB is to contribute to the balanced development of the Union.

  1. Chraibi, Driss. Heirs to the Past

    Nagib, one of Driss' brothers has one of the most radical reactions to hearing the Seigneur's voice and the reading of the will. Nagib is a very violent person who uses force rather than reason to attain his desired goal.

  2. Regulation 2560/2001 on cross-border payments in Europe.

    Then, some counter-arguments are given as they are held up by banks. The following gives some technical background of the decision before some economic background analysis is given. Another part makes some observations on the patterns of governance that surfaced in the process of forming the regulation in question and evaluates those.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work