• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The European Union will be enlarged from 15 to 25 member countries. Another two might join in 2007. Should this be the end of enlargement?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The European Union will be enlarged from 15 to 25 member countries. Another two might join in 2007. Should this be the end of enlargement? Elvira Gubayeva The European Union has been growing in size ever since its creation after the Second World War. It began as a post-war initiative between six countries pooling control over coal and steel to guarantee a more peaceful future for Europe. It now includes 15 member countries( Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Luxemburg Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom), has its own currency and has a lot of political power in global affairs. Plans have been made for a further enlargement of the Union to 25 member countries (Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Poland, Slovakia, and Slovenia), while negotiations are continuing about the accession of Bulgaria and Romania. Although there are many people who argue for further enlargement, stating that this would increase stability in Europe, others argue that this should be the end of enlargement, mainly due to the disastrous economic consequences that further enlargement could bring about. ...read more.

Middle

As well as that, the enlarged European Union would become stronger in its fight against crime and illegal immigration as there would be greater aid from new member countries. As far as politics are concerned, further enlargement could strengthen its role in foreign affairs, security policy, trade policy and other fields of global governance. Having said that, there are also disadvantages to further enlargement. Firstly, the accession of new member countries would increase the budgetary contributions of existing countries. This would be used to stabilise the economies of future member countries to fit to European Union standards. The great majority of countries likely to be brought into the EU by enlargement are below the poverty level. For example, Poland has a GDP per head that is less than half of the current European Union average. Secondly, there is a possibility of what is called social dumping. This means that workers from poorer accession countries would migrate to the West in search of employment.Unemployment in accession countries and countries wanting to join the European Union is already higher than the unemployment rate in countries which are part of the European Union. ...read more.

Conclusion

The cultures of different countries would mix, thus dissolving each country's own culture. Overall, although there are many advantages to further enlargement, the possible consequences that this enlargement could bring outweigh them. The larger the Union becomes, the less power it will have as there would be such a great number of factors that would need to be adressed, such as financial aid. Negotiations would be slow and ineffective as more member countries would provoke more disagreements. The enlargement would have a particularly negative effect on existing member countries, who would have to increase their taxations in order to help new member countries. Citizens should also be put into account and from a recent survey conducted in the United Kingdom, a member country, most people are negative in their responses whether the European Union should be further enlarged. Many people argue that Europe would lose its identity if its culture becomes so intermixed with other cultures. Therefore, the European Union should think very carefully about enlargement and its consequences in order to avoid it becoming ineffective as a system. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level European Union section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level European Union essays

  1. Why are developing countries unhappy with the global arrangements under the Bretton Woods system?

    The strict regulations imposed by the IMF and World Bank on what constitutes a loan gives them complete control over borrowing governments. These conditions are not always in the true interests of the borrowing country but their perilous financial situation gives them no choice but to accept the terms and conditions of the loan (Stein, 2004:4).

  2. European Union

    However, in Duke v GEC Reliance Ltd (1988)15 - the facts were similar to Marshall but Mrs Duke was unable to rely on the Directive because her employer was a private company. In such circumstances the failure of the member state to implement a Directive may give rise in EC law to an action for damages.

  1. To what extent was the fall of Olivares due to the Union of Arms?The ...

    In 1625, Spain managed a "triple success"31 although it cost over fourteen million ducats, which was simply unaffordable in Spain's position. In 1626, the Dutch declared 'peace with honour' with unconditional ceasefires when they captured Grol and Oldenzal. On both occasions Olivares was offered the opportunity to enter negotiations for

  2. Transformation of the U.S. Hegemony in Europe through NATO after the Cold War

    Alternatives such as developing the autonomy of WEU, an exclusive focus on ESDI within NATO or the establishment of a fourth pillar within EU were not accepted21. Kosovo crisis, however, in the first months of 1999, also showed the U.S.

  1. The Importance of the Cyprus Issue in terms of the Accomplishment of the ESDP

    If we look at the EU's position on the Cyprus issue during the Cold War years, we see that its role was rather insignificant, as it was not yet speaking with one voice in the international arena, and, an important party on the issue, the United Kingdom, who is also

  2. What does citizenship mean in the European context?

    That would be the major challenge to the conceptualization of European Citizenship. This, naturally, has not been part of the Post-Maastricht political debate. In Western, liberal democracies public authority requires legitimation through one principal source: The citizens of the polity.

  1. Economic and political integration between the member states of the European Union means that ...

    The European Parliament Elected by direct universal suffrage since 1979, the European Parliament now comprises 626 members. (Reference Parliament Members Germany 99 France 87 Italy 87 United Kingdom 87 Spain 64 Netherlands 31 Belgium 25 Greece 25 Portugal 25 Sweden 22 Austria 21 Denmark 16 Finland 16 Ireland 15 Luxembourg

  2. International Economics

    we were the only country to be suffering from a bad recession then the chances are the central bank wouldn't take any action until the problem has spread to other countries and became big enough for them to get involved.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work