• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'The First World War was important as a locomotive for domestic change' (Clive Emsley). How true is this of trade unions and government intervention in social welfare in Britain during the period 1914-1922?

Extracts from this document...


'THE FIRST WORLD WAR WAS IMPORTANT AS A LOCOMOTIVE FOR DOMESTIC CHANGE' (CLIVE EMSLEY). HOW TRUE IS THIS OF TRADE UNIONS AND GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION IN SOCIAL WELFARE IN BRITAIN DURING THE PERIOD 1914-1922? The First World War introduced a lot of large welfare reform, including the war pension, but welfare reforms had started before the beginning of the First World War, and continued after it. In that sense, the First World War can be seen as a catalyst (or locomotive, if you will) for welfare reform, as it sped up the changes. Trade Unions had been active before the First World War, with the boom before the war helping trade unions to negotiate better terms and conditions, as can be seen in the Miners Strike of 1910. Trade Unions really started to get strong and militant with the formation of the Triple Alliance, when the miners, transport workers, and railway men joined together to become a hugely powerful force. Around the time when the Labour party was formed in 1906, the Liberal Democrats introduced several new welfare acts including the Children's Act and the Education Act. These acts were designed to keep the nation healthy and educated, as it was seen by both the Liberals and the Labour party that these were two major elements the youth of Britain was lacking, and it would be those people that may be relied upon later. ...read more.


This was to ensure those that had lost husbands or parents were looked after properly after the war. This was again another huge example of state intervention. More evidence of the war acting as a locomotive can be seen in the war pensions, which gave injured soldiers' disability benefits. Introduced in 1916, this links back to the Workmen's Compensation Act, but now gave injured soldiers the chance to claim as well. The government saw that health and safety in factories was a large concern, and the government began to employ safety inspectors in 1918. Around this time, cheap factory meals were introduced through internal canteens. The government relied heavily on industry during the First World War to provide everything needed for a war, and so the power of trade unions was increased. They were less threatened as well, as there was no army to break up strikes, as it had been done in Russia in 1917. A huge leap forward for the Trade Unions was the Defence of the Realm Act, as it promised wage increases, showing the huge power the trade unions had over the government. Some workers, however, seemed to feel they didn't even need the trade unions backing to help them bargain during strikes at this point. In Clydeside, there were many unofficial strikes. Workers knew how heavily the government was relying on them during the war, and in 1915 a group of workers took advantage of this fact by striking for higher pay without the backing of their union. ...read more.


He says that some of the reforms and policies were abolished after the war, a prime example of this being that not even half of the 500 000 homes promised for the "heroes" were ever to be built, and another being that the government failed to raise school leaving age to 15, as it failed to supply the funds needed. Also the nationalised businesses were less tightly controlled after the war. When their was the "bust" in 1921 after the "boom" of 1919, the number of union strikes declined incredibly, and it was also in this year that the Triple Alliance split, showing a loss of the trade unions power. This was because of high unemployment; the railway men and transport workers did not want to support the miners strike for fear of their jobs being given to the unemployed. Despite the few reversals on policies, and the small loss of power by trade unions after the war, I still agree with Clive Emsley's view that the war was a locomotive for domestic change, as it influenced so many new reforms and policies, and made the trade unions more powerful than ever before, and completely changed the governments laissez faire approach. The First World War acted as a catalyst to speed up the growth of the unions, and several welfare reforms that helped the working class, and in this sense I do believe it acted as a locomotive for domestic change. Ciaran Sainty History Coursework 1489 words ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Trade Unions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Trade Unions essays

  1. Work-life balance. In this essay, I will be writing on behalf of the New ...

    Work-life conflict has been shown to be a significant concern for many workers - 46% of respondents in a recent survey identified it as a problem in their lives (Beaumont 2007).

  2. 'The impact of legislation introduced between 1980 and 1993 is the principal reason for ...

    No secondary action is legal' (Kessler and Bayliss 1998 Pg 252). McCarthy summed up these proceedings by saying that 'while the British workers freedom to strike has not been extinguished or fatally damaged, it can be deployed only in a more structured way and at greater risk' (McCarthy 1992 Pg.71).

  1. Running head: Winnipeg 1919

    (Masters, 1950). This strike served as a successful example of labor strikers receiving their demands through a strike. A few months before the Winnipeg General Strike occurred, a meeting was held in Calgary between miners, lumber, carpenter, machinists, railway and the socialist party of Canada in hopes that they will organize One

  2. There are two broad opposing frames of reference on the role of trade unions:

    > Can be said that the end of eighteenth century, journeymen's societies had developed into a trade union. > The Combination Acts had little effect upon the congregation of employees, which spread across a number of occupations. > In 1824 the Acts were abolished > In 1825 the new Act

  1. Challenge of change

    Trade unions encourage employers to resist such a temptation. For public service workers, matters such as pay and conditions of service were negotiated centrally through a process called 'collective bargaining'.

  2. Trade Unions

    It must be remembered that there are many other issues that a trade union will negotiate for its members other than pay rises (e.g. length of the working week, working conditions, and proposed redundancies).

  1. Trade Unions

    Cases that go to industrial tribunals are usually about pay, unfair dismissal, redundancy or discrimination at work. The Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service (ACAS) is often used to help find a solution to a dispute, which is acceptable to both sides.

  2. Is the strike no longer necessary?

    For example, high rates of absenteeism can be disruptive to production schedules. Even if management have some sort of contingency plan and employ a sufficient number of 'spare' workers to cover for absentees, this increases selection and training expenditure. Similarly, if employees decide to leave the workplace the organisation has

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work