• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

There Are No Effective Checks On Presidential Power. Discuss

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐There Are No Effective Checks On Presidential Power The exercise of Presidential power requires agreement from another branch of Government, usually the legislature. The main exception to this principle is the President?s role as Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces because with over 3000 miles of ocean between the USA and its potential enemies, it was not expected that this would be a significant role when the Constitution was written. While there is a check on this power, since only Congress can declare war, the strength of this check is questionable as the President can deploy troops for a total of 60 days before getting Congressional approval. In addition to this, despite the fact that Congress has declared war just 5 times, the last being after the 1941 attack on Pearl Harbour, the US military has been in almost constant use in overseas conflicts, including Vietnam War and Iraq. ...read more.


It enables it to vote on the money a President is allowed to spend on policies, thus limiting a President's actions. One of the most prominent examples is the Foreign Assistance Act of 1974, which eliminated all military funding for the government of South Vietnam and thereby ended the Vietnam War. This illustrates how Presidential influence does not go unchecked. There is another successful restraint of the President's power - he does not sit within the Legislature and consequently does not have the power to make any laws. All laws originate in the Congress. President can approve them or veto them but the Congress can override the President's veto if it has enough votes. Congress can also adjourn his ?emergency sessions? without passing the legislation he wants. ...read more.


It may be argued that most appointments go through without being blocked and that, in practice, this power is not significant. Yet it must be noted that a key reason why most appointments go ahead is because the president is normally careful to nominate figures who are unlikely to prove controversial to Senators. For that reason, the Senate's confirmation of Presidential appointments effectively acts as a check on the President's power. Although there are effective checks on presidential power, some are undermined by a number of loopholes which the President benefits from, especially in regard to foreign affairs. However, there is a wide consensus that the President faces more checks on his authority within domestic affairs, such as judicial reviews and Congress' power of the purse. Therefore, the allegation that there are no effective checks on Presidential power is false. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United States section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United States essays

  1. "Supreme Court Appointments are always controversial" Discuss

    However, as we have seen with the Samuel Alito confirmation, senators from the Presidents party tend to use the confirmation as an occasion to throw soft questions at the candidate, without really trying to probe the candidate for answers that might reveal whether or not the candidate is suitably qualified for the job.

  2. 'The President faces considerable constraints in domestic policy in comparison to the UK Prime ...

    is -aside from disagreement by the richest insider Pressure Groups or the biggest show of dissent from MPs- technically unlimited. The only formal threat to Blair's most extreme modification proposals is the E.C.H.R. The UK PM can be in office for an unlimited amount of time providing he has been

  1. Using examples, explain the limitations on the Supreme Courts powers.How do Presidents veto legislation, ...

    If the Senate suspects a judge to be tyrannical they may if they wish remove the judge from their post through impeachment. Even the threat of impeachment can be effective. In 1968 Associate Justice Abe Fortas resigned rather than face almost certain impeachment.

  2. US pressures groups are undemocratic, discuss

    Small groups such as those created by Nader couldn't hope to raise that money within such a limited time span. A final point to make, through registering 527 groups, interest groups can also create advertisements which can influence voters as to who they should vote for.

  1. "Imperial in foreign affairs, imperilled in others". How accurate is this view of Presidential ...

    This has been particularly significant following the events of Watergate in 1972, as the transparency of Presidential activity has been enhanced due to the increased strength of such initiatives as the Congressional Budget Office and transparency rules. I think that this has made the Presidency disadvantaged in terms of power, even directly after inauguration.

  2. presidential power how far does it go

    The Justice Department must provide proof that the target is "agent of a foreign power". When expediency is important wiretapping may begin 72 hours before a warrant is physically obtained. During wartime, 15 days is allowed. If neither Congress nor the court is consulted, the wiretap must be withdrawn and all evidence destroyed.

  1. Critically analyse the appointment and confirmation process for nominees in the US Supreme Court

    Advocacy groups politicise the process too. The National Abortion Rights Action League and the National Organization for Women sought to challenge Bork?s nomination. Even a television advertising campaign was mounted against his nomination, costing around $15 million[20]. Furthermore In 2006 the Washington Post reported that over a 3 month period of the nomination debate concerning Samuel

  2. American Government Term Paper #1. Discuss the theory of Checks and Balances as outlined ...

    The Bill of Rights was thought to be adopted because ?greater powers needed greater limitations? (We the People). The Constitution is not taken or construed the same exact way by each person. The framers intended it to be interpreted a certain way, and not the way we go about taking its meaning into our own ways, using our own definitions.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work