• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was the Weimar constitution a model of democracy or was it providing a blue print for abuse?

Extracts from this document...


Was the Weimar constitution a model of democracy or was it providing a blue print for abuse? In January 1919 Hugo Preuss, whom was a left wing liberal set out to make a constitution, which was drawn up and submitted to the national assembly in Weimar. Historian William Carr says, "Preuss set out to combine democracy and parliamentary government with a high degree of centralisation for the left wing" which meant he was trying to give power to the left. Following extensive debates the constitution was eventually declared on 11 August 1919. This constitution contained 181 articles which was divided up into different groups called ' Rights and Duties of the German people' and also 'Structures and Functions of the Reich. The German people over 20 years of age now had the power to vote for a president who would be elected for 7 years (Article 41), the president had all the power being able to appoint and dismiss all-important officials, civilians military and also the chancellor. He also had total command of the army and was able to dissolve the Reichstag and if there was an emergency he could issue laws by decree and override constitutional rights of the German people this was Article 48 of the constitution. ...read more.


The expectation was that in normal circumstances ministers responsible to the Reichstag should govern Germany but under article 48 of the constitution the president was given powers to intervene in an emergency. Article 48 says that if a state fails to perform the duties imposed upon it by the federal constitution or by federal law, the president...may enforce performance with the aid of the armed forces. If public order and security are seriously disturbed or endangered within the Federation, the President may take all-necessary steps for their restoration, intervening, if need be, with the aid of the armed forces, and he can also dissolve the Reichstag by suspending civil liberties. This was a good article if used wisely as Article 48 emergency laws, were there to support the state through hardship and a potentially dangerous method for abusing power as this was described as a suicide clause. But this would only be a threat if the Right Wing got control of the government, which did happen when Hitler came to power. Historian John Hiden said "most Germans appeared to see the president as a sort of emperor substitute". He says this, as the German people were used to only having one person in charge of the country. ...read more.


This shows that the government were not supported and many historians wonder why the government lasted for so long. Many Historians say that the constitution was very democratic, but it never worked, as it was too much at once for the country. Another reason why the constitution never totally worked proper is that Hugo Preuss took points from other constitutions, which mixed articles up. The people were not ready for all there rights and nothing really changed with the elites, as the army and right wing still had control but they were still not strong enough to stand up and overthrow the government. I also think that the constitution looked good on paper as it gave the people laws and produced a federal country so it was very democratic. But it was steered more to the right wing as they could abuse it, as if a right wing extremist became president he could choose his own chancellor and control all of the country by using the constitution like article 48 which he would be able to stop anyone from intervening by getting rid of the Reichstag and using armed forces. I that the constitution was very democratic, but the people were not used to having all this power and freedom so the constitution was there to be abused by the right wing government if they came to power. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United States section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United States essays

  1. The Galatic Assembly

    3 powerful factions (CMG MoTB, FDC) (sit as "permanent members") along with 2 other member factions which have 2 year terms. It dispatches military operations, imposes economic sanctions, mandates arms inspections, deploys human rights and election monitors and more. Member factions may be voted in.

  2. Consider whether the activities of pressure groups help or hinder the operation of a ...

    and the National Organisation of Women (NOW) over the issue of abortion; the NRA is opposed by the Coalition to End Gun Violence (of which the Brady Group is a member.) Threats to democracy can be posed by the wide ranging influence of wealthy and powerful groups, but these are

  1. Sexual Abuse in U.S. Military

    that went unfounded.13 The executive summary also offered some recommendations. The most significant was holding a single point responsible for the policy within the department. From this recommendation the Joint Task Force for s****l Prevention and Response was formed.14 The following year, The Joint Task Force published the second DIBRS survey.

  2. The Religious Right

    Adult hardcore p*********y can tragically lead to s*x crimes against women and children, yet s*x videos are available in millions of U.S. hotel rooms which we strongly believe are prosecutable." Focus on the Family Focus on the Family (FotF) was founded in California by Dr.

  1. The Australian Constitution is the ultimate law ruling in Australia

    It is responsible for much delegated legislation. The judiciary (another term for court system) interprets the laws and is handed over to our courts of law. The powers and functions of each are separate and carried out by separate personnel.

  2. The British Constitution

    The last time a Monarch became involved in political issues he was executed. King Charles ? believed in the divine right of kings, he was a deeply religious man favouring the High Anglican form of worship. He also spent a lot of the crowns money on works of art and painting collections.

  1. The paradox of power in the United States constitution.

    The states have the power to amend the Constitution (Article Five), and therefore take on a role similar to that of the Supreme Court in that they are allowed to judge any part of the Constitution and change it. The power of amendment holds enormous responsibility and power: the states

  2. The Making of the Constitution.

    Robert Morris of Philadelphia nominates George Washington as president of the convention. The convention delegates agreed that a new constitution was needed. However, many controversies had to be resolved before one could be drafted. A basic issue was the extent of powers to be granted to the national government, and

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work