Was the Weimar constitution a model of democracy or was it providing a blue print for abuse?

Authors Avatar

Was the Weimar constitution a model of democracy or was it providing a blue print for abuse?

In January 1919 Hugo Preuss, whom was a left wing liberal set out to make a constitution, which was drawn up and submitted to the national assembly in Weimar. Historian William Carr says, “Preuss set out to combine democracy and parliamentary government with a high degree of centralisation for the left wing” which meant he was trying to give power to the left. Following extensive debates the constitution was eventually declared on 11 August 1919. This constitution contained 181 articles which was divided up into different groups called ‘ Rights and Duties of the German people’ and also ‘Structures and Functions of the Reich. The German people over 20 years of age now had the power to vote for a president who would be elected for 7 years (Article 41), the president had all the power being able to appoint and dismiss all-important officials, civilians military and also the chancellor. He also had total command of the army and was able to dissolve the Reichstag and if there was an emergency he could issue laws by decree and override constitutional rights of the German people this was Article 48 of the constitution. Historian Stephen J Lee said that the constitution was regarded as the most advanced in its time. Also another historian called A. Nicholls, says, “The Weimar Republic was not attributable to the democratic nature of the constitution”. This historian is saying that the constitution was very democratic but Germany was not ready for this as it was new to them.

In January 1919 elections of the constituent assembly took place. The SPD emerged as the largest single party with a 38% share of the vote receiving 163 of the 400+ seats. It was however outnumbered by anti-socialist parties largely representing the middle and upper class. The combined strength of these parties the DVP DNVP and also DDP had a total of 249 seats, just over half of the total. Germany’s socialists no longer had a lot of political power, as they would not work together this is when the threat came from the right wing as they were more organized.  Ernst Troeltsch wrote in an article in 1919 said, “Overnight we have become the most radical democracy in Europe”. What he meant by this is that Germany has changed so quickly without planning ahead.

Join now!

The assembly-started work on 6 February 1919 but not in the capital Berlin as it was still tense and disrupted, but at the small town of Weimar. The Weimar was guarded by 7000 Freikorps troops so it would be safe from any type of rebellion.  By 10 February an agreement had been reached on an interim constitution, the purpose of which was to allow Ebert’s government to be replaced by one whose authority was based on the democratic vote of 19 January. The agreement provided for a government, headed by a chancellor, which would be accountable to the assembly, ...

This is a preview of the whole essay