• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

When and why did a Labour party develop and how important was it by 1914?

Extracts from this document...


When and why did a Labour party develop and how important was it by 1914? The development of the Labour party began in the 1880s, although signs of an increased working-class consciousness were evident from the middle of the previous decade. A number of factors contributed to its development; the new organisation of the labour forces, particularly into trade unions, their increased political interest, laws introduced at the time and the relative decline of the Liberal party. The last quarter of the nineteenth century saw the growth and increasing strength of the working class, who were articulate, powerful and important. The Labour aristocracy involved in the old or 'model' trade unions were wanting to take a much more direct and positive part in politics. By 1875, the model unions had secured all their own legal rights. By 1885 all unions had their full legal status secured; the new unskilled ones as well as the old model ones. Between 1889 and 1891 the number of less skilled unions doubled. There was a series of strikes which brought these non-skilled workers into the limelight, for example the Matchgirl strike of 1888, the Gasworkers' strike of 1889 and the Dockers' strike of the same year. After losing the strikes, managers hit back. In the 1890s they set up what developed into the National Free Labour Association. Its members were people who were prepared to take up jobs while the usual workers were on strike. ...read more.


They were soon joined as MPs by Ramsey MacDonald and Phillip Snowdon. The Independent Labour Party was formed in 1893, and it began to get itself heard. However, there were still problems. In 1895 all twenty-eight Labour candidates were defeated, including Hardie. In 1899 the Trade Union Conference and Amalgamated Society of Railway Servants passed the resolution; 'we must secure better representation of the interests of Labour in the House of Commons.' This led to the establishment of the Labour Representation Committee. This was the Labour Party in all but name. A meeting was set up, and 129 delegates came to discuss what should be done. They were representatives from all socialist groups. The Socialist Democratic Party dropped out however, as the decisions were not radical enough for them. In 1900 Hardie and Bell were elected as Labour MPs, and were soon joined by Arthur Henderson. By 1906 they had twenty-nine MPs. The Taff Vale case of 1901 happened as a result of a strike at the unfair dismissal of a railway worker. After the strike, the managers sued the union and it was forced by the House of Lords to pay �23,000. Both unions and individual unionists could be sued, which very much restrained union action, and was seen as an insult on the rights of workers. It drove more unionists to support Labour. ...read more.


The issue of how important the Labour party was by 1914 is an extremely contentious one. Keith Laybourn explains; 'Labour's pre-war parliamentary performance was hardly indicative of the true level of its appeal.' It is true that it is hard to assess the party's real importance by 1914, as while it amassed huge levels of trade union support, this was not transferred to votes because of the party's financial restrictions and the limited franchise of the time. However, the rise from two MPs in 1900 to 42 in 1910 still represents an impressive first decade, which perhaps indicated that its popularity would continue rising after 1914. The historian Jack Reynolds confirmed this belief, concluding that Labour was progressing well before 1914 as long as she kept close links with trade unions, which she invariably did. This is disputed however by the historian Roy Douglas, who stated: 'No shred of evidence existed anywhere which might suggest that within 10 years the Labour party would be forming the government of the country.' The historian Derek Tanner went as far as saying that in fact Labour was in deep trouble by 1914, appearing to be past its peak, and was only saved by the war. This is probably an exaggerated perspective, as while Douglas is correct in stating that Labour's subsequent successes could not have been prognosticated, when their severe restrictions are taken into consideration, the meagre success they experienced before 1914 was promising and augured well for the future. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Wilted Socialist Rose?: Changing fortunes of the French Socialist Party

    This was shown in the 1974 presidential elections, when the PS' leader and candidate, Mitterrand came out top in the first ballot, but narrowly lost the presidency by a margin of 1.6%. With a new leader experienced in national and international politics, new party leaders and cadres from left alliance

  2. Socialist uses of workers' inquiry

    Does work go on at night? 37. State the number of hours of work of children and young people under 16. 38. Are there shifts if children and young people replacing each other alternately during working hours? 39. Has the government or municipality applied the laws regulating child labor?

  1. Russia's Political Party System as an Obstacle to Democratization

    Factions may be formed by parties surpassing the 5 percent barrier in the party list vote, but the minimum membership requirement of forty members effectively reduced the number of factions that could be formed. In theory, this should have led to parties combining factions or even developing their constituencies prior to the election in order to "win big."

  2. The rise of the Labour Party had more to do with class consciousness than ...

    Upon improved electoral success in 1906, following which election the LRC had 30 MPs elected to Parliament, the LRC was renamed the Labour Party. What is important about this initial conception of the LRC and the Labour Party is that the TUC's moves at the time were motivated principally by fear of the unions' vulnerable legal positions.

  1. The Parliamentary Reform and Redistribution Act of 1884 - 1885.

    adult male householders and �10 lodgers the right to vote Also added about six million to the total number who could vote in parliamentary elections Source-http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/PR1884.htm This source is supported by: The act extended the 1867 concessions from the boroughs to the countryside.

  2. Socialist Movement in Europe 1870 - 1914.

    Lenin favoured a small, disciplined party of professional revolutionaries; the Mensheviks wanted a loosely organised mass party. Lenin's concept of revolution in Russia was thus: since the Russian bourgeoisie was too weak to lead its own revolution, the proletarians and peasants must unite to overthrow the czarist regime and establish a dictatorship of the proletariat and peasantry.

  1. Analysis of Party Electoral Communications in the 1997 UK General Election.

    Party Ideologies The ideologies that surround political parties (i.e. the thinking behind their opinions) are central to determining voters' choices. The Labour Party was seen to demonstrate a huge change in party ideology in the 1997 campaign, so to understand how Labour "reinvented" itself, one must understand how these ideologies work.

  2. What were the most important factors in the rise of the modern state?

    development of the modern state system has been the cause of much debate. This argument is illustrated between two thinkers: Stephen Krasner and Paul Hirst in a work by Hirst entitled The International Origins of National Sovereignty. Hirst attempts to counter Krasner?s argument, which is that the Peace of Westphalia

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work