• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did Marx Criticise Liberal Democracy?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why did Marx Criticise Liberal Democracy? Bourgeois democracy is a political system where the government and agencies of the state are made up of those in the ruling class. The bourgeoisie are not owners of land as in the feudal system but owners of capital. They control the finance, the factories and the machines upon which modern industrial production is based. Therefore, the bourgeoisie can exploit the industrial workers and proletariat and just as in the feudal aristocracy exploited the peasants. The state and its instruments support the beliefs and values of the bourgeois democracy and portray the exiting state of affairs as natural and right for all society's interest. ('The state is the form in which the individuals of a ruling class assert their common interest'.) Marx believed that the most basic fact about any society is the nature of its economic organisation that involves two things: the methods of production and its social organisation. Therefore wealth and work is distributed on the basis of class and Marx insisted that in any society with a class system there would always be a fundamental division between those who own the means of production (the ruling class) ...read more.

Middle

Alienation in Marxism is where the individual feels the world around them confronts them as something as hostile and threatening; they are not at home in it. ('The worker feels himself at home only during his leisure whereas at work he feels homeless.') His labour is no longer his own but is traded for money, thus leaving the worker with no interest in his work and also exercises no creativity. Workers are alienated in the workplace further when placed in specialised areas of production and are at the mercy of capitalism as they are driven into the factories to produce goods and services. Marx believed this was the principal evil of capitalism. ('His work is not voluntary but imposed forced labour'). Marx's criticisms of liberal democracy are based on the fact that it is fundamentally flawed and incapable of fulfilling its functions because of its link to capitalism. For example, Marx argued that you could never have a neutral state in a society with a class system. ...read more.

Conclusion

Despite this, Marx had pointed out in his theory of the state that freedom and equality don't seem to fit together well. Within western democracy, power resides in the hands of groups, mainly political parties but also interest groups. It is a matter of judgement as to whether these groups operate ion their own interests or, as a reflection of popular will. Democracy is supposed to be based on the sovereignty of the people and therefore government should be an expression of the people's will. Yet assessing the will is of the people is not easy since there is genuine dispute universally about what is right for society. The usual way around this is to say the will of the people is the will of the majority. By Marx's criticisms, liberal democracy is not the will of the majority as that would be the proletariat but is dictatorship of the bourgeoisie. Marx's criticisms of liberal democracy are still valid and applicable to the democracy of today yet are conceptualised slightly differently to adjust to modern developments in political structure. Katy Lucas Analyse Marxist Criticisms of Liberal Democracy October 02 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Utilitarianism: Explanation And Study of Criticisms

    Is the appeal to dignity in appropriate? In particular, what's the evidence that a sense of dignity is an essential component of happiness? Does Mill run the risk of making the satisfaction of the sense of dignity a good equal with pleasure? Proof" of PU No strict proof can be given in issues of ultimate ends because it would involve evaluating basic values, which cannot be done.

  2. Indonesia: Transition and Prospects for Democracy

    Nevertheless, in 2004, Indonesia voted for their president, vice-president and parliament in "free and fair" direct elections for the first time, becoming a "presidential democracy" (Liddle & Mujani, 2006). In the name of greater public participation, direct elections for regional leaders nationwide took place in 2005.

  1. Is the Liberal perspective on world politics too idealistic?

    and the domination of society by the monarchy and a hereditary aristocracy (Britain). Adams and Sydie state that these "thinkers put society and social relations under intense scrutiny". (Enlightenment and Liberalism. Jan 13 2003) Enlightenment was closely linked with scientific revolution.

  2. An analysis of the Marxist perspective on religion

    However, in history we see that the Reformation occurred in 16th century Germany where feudalism still reigned, whereas Capitalism as we know it did not come about until the 19th century. Theologian Max Weber then went on to say that this clearly shows that religious institutions go on to create new economic realities.

  1. Socialist uses of workers' inquiry

    In connection with the development of machinery and the growth of the productiveness of labor, has its intensity and duration increased or decreased? 78. Do you know of any cases of increases in wages as a result of improvements in production?

  2. This essay is aimed to distinguished between what Marx mean by Alienation in relation ...

    Animals produce only to satisfy their survival. And they produce only in ways that are fixed to the nature. But human beings can produce many kinds of goods in many different ways. As Marx said, ''man is capable of producing according to the standards of every species and applying to

  1. Compare and contrast Marx and Engels with Mill regarding social and economic progress

    Mill lays out, in Chapter 1 of On Liberty, what he believes were the four stages of social development. The earliest stage is that when 'Liberty meant protection against the tyranny of the political rulers'; therefore the era of history when society had to fight against despotism in order to gain some freedom over their lives.

  2. Can a plausible case be made for participatory democracy under modern conditions?

    However, surely this would not be what advocates of the Classical theory, such as Rousseau, would count as a participatory democracy, since a truly participatory democracy calls for full and equal participation by all. We must admit then, as Rousseau does, that such a system of total participation is realisable only in small groups.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work