• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and contrast the studies of Sherif and Asch. What do they tell us about conformity?

Extracts from this document...


Compare and contrast the studies of Sherif and Asch. What do they tell us about conformity? Conformity is defined by Zimbardo & Leippe (1991) as: "A change in belief or behaviour in response to real or imagined group pressure when there is no direct request to comply with the group nor any reason to justify the behaviour change" Conformity can be categorised into two main groups, informational influence and normative influence. Informational influence is when one changes their private opinion to match that of others, because they believe that ones judgement is superior to their own. On the other hand normative influence is when one changes their public opinion but their private opinion remains the same, because they want to be liked by the group. Both Sherif and Asch investigated these influences in their experiments which were conducted about sixteen years apart. Although Asch's experiment was a response to the earlier investigation, Sherif had raised significant questions and had shown important points in his investigation. ...read more.


Sherif created this group by creating trust between the participants; this was done in the first trials (neutral trials) where everyone gave the correct answers. This built trust between the stooges and the na�ve participant. Also contrastive of Asch's study, the answer was unambiguous and so made it elusive whether conformity was occurring or not. Another difference between the two experiments was that Asch had control over his participants and Sherif had none. The effect of this was that the results could show conformity clearly as it was evidently definable conformity was occurring whereas Sherif's results were in ranges that followed a norm. Crutchfield (1954) questioned whether others needed to be physically there for conformity to occur. This is significant as the experiments used group situations to determine whether conformity was occurring. However Sherif had first asked his participants to answer privately then in a group to compare the results. This showed that Sherif was also concerned of individual opinion compared to group opinion. ...read more.


However Asch's findings had shown much more clearly the factors affecting conformity and so had produced variables into the situation which controlled the amount of conformity taking place. Sherif's experiment was the first to create this idea of group norms and Asch later extended Sherif's work by drawing better conclusions from his own studies. Neither of the experiments had taken into consideration social role and it being an influencing factor. Asch's study has shown that the conformity level is quite high. 'The results reveal the tremendous impact of an "obviously" correct but unanimous majority on the judgements of a lone participant' (van Avermaet (1996)) The findings from both experiments show that conformity occurs for two reasons, normative influence and informational influence. Participants conformed either because of internalisation or compliance. But this idea can be argued against with the self-categorisation approach. The idea being that if we believe that there is a correct answer and we are uncertain what it is, then only those whom we categorise as belonging to 'our' group will influence our judgements. As can be seen Asch and Sherif's studies have drawn many conclusions and raised even more questions in why conformity does occur. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Social Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Social Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Psychology Coursework - Conformity

    4 star(s)

    During the trials where a critical situation was added for the na�ve participant to deal with 32% of the na�ve participants went with the group norm and conformed to giving the wrong answer. Both these experiments by Sherif and Asch show that people will go with a group norm and

  2. Psychology Questions Ansewered

    The prisoners may have become depressed and may also have begun internalizing their role as prisoner. The researchers carried out the experiment outside of a lab so they could not control the situation as in the lab. The students were reluctant to carry out the drunk condition.

  1. AS Communication Studies Presentation

    Key: Audience members Tables Me Board (presentation) Path line of where I will walk Laptop (connected to a projector) Video recorder In this second design of my room layout and seating plan, I have taken many more factors into consideration.

  2. Theories of Asch and Tajfel

    This shows that IMMLs think their group is superior for reasons other than just performance. According to Tajfel "in order to evaluate their own opinion and abilities, individuals not only compare themselves to other individuals with whom they interact, but also compare their own group, with similar and distinct, out groups."

  1. The experiment conducted tested the theory of conformity under the influence of group pressure.

    In contrast, the standards concerning beliefs about "social reality" are relative. Festinger divides beliefs about social reality into two categories. The first includes "beliefs about abilities," and the second involves "opinions." In both of these categories, we need to find other people who can serve as standards against which we can judge ourselves.

  2. Evaluation of an investigation into group identity - Sherif et al (1954)

    Procedure: The boys were transported in two groups to the Robber?s Cave National Park, Oklahoma. At the camp the two groups live separately. For five days they were given tasks to carry out together in order to help them bond. Each group was given a name (Eagles and Rattlers)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work