• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Consider psychological research into explanations of forgetting in Short-term memory

Extracts from this document...


Consider psychological research into explanations of forgetting in Short-term memory The term forgetting is used when learnt information can't be retrieved from both the short term memory and the long term memory. There have been many suggestions made to explain the reason that we forget information. The most common explanation came from Freud who devised the theory of repression. In his theory he believed that forgetting occurs because memories can be emotionally painful, mainly as they are the remnants of a trauma or an unpleasant event. Repression occurs when the mind represses these memories. Although this is a valid explanation for the forgetting of tragic memories it fails to explain the vast amount of forgetting of more daily occurring mundane events. To justify forgetting within STM psychologists suggests that information stored in the STM simply disappears with time, or it is pushed out by new information. ...read more.


However, if rehearsal is prevented then the trigram is forgotten after around 15 seconds. They also found that the loss of information was initially rapid, followed by a decrease in loss, indicating that the classic "forgetting Curve" is evident. Although this experiment proved successful in explaining forgetting in STM it was subject to much criticism. The study lacks ecological validity and mundane realism as the information presented was artificial and had no significant meaning to the participants, suggesting that more meaningful information would have been remembered better. However this criticism offers an explanation as to why we forget meaningless information on a daily basis. The outcome of their experiment was heavily influenced by the fact that the participants were given so many trigrams to remember. They were overloaded with information and that in itself can cause confusion without the need for interference tasks. ...read more.


They were then probed at the end of the list with the digit and asked to state which digit followed it in the list. Lists were presented at 1 or 4 per second audit orally. The experimenters found that forgetting varied with the number of digits presented between the probe and the end of the list, but not with the time between the probe and the end of the list. This suggested, therefore, that forgetting was interference based rather than time based which further supports the works of Peterson and Peterson. They carried out a further experiment, this time the digits were presented at different speeds. It was found that recall improved when digits were presented faster, again suggesting that decay was to blame rather than displacement. Studies provide us with evidence that both the Trace Decay Theory and The Displacement Theory are explanations of forgetting within STM. However, the evidence would suggest that decay and interference play the bigger part in this process. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology essays


    the short term memory and prove that if the information is not rehearsed then it can't be stored in the short-term memory therefore causing the participant to forget the information. METHOD DESIGN An experiment was conducted for this investigation. The type of experiment used was a lab experiment, as it was conducted in controlling and manipulating the independent variable.

  2. Discuss biological and psychological explanations of depression

    Lewinsohn (1974) put forward another psychological approach to depression by proposing a behavioural theory based on the notion that depression occurs as a result of a reduction in the level of reinforcement or reward. Rewards stem from different sources; e.g.

  1. effects of chunking and unchunking on short term memory

    Task 1 may have interfered with Task 2. To truly see if chunking increases the active memory capacity the time to learn the sequence should be increased to at least 30 seconds and the time to clear the memory with trivia questions should also be increased.

  2. Investigating the short-term memory

    In his study, he investigated the coding of words. This word included the ones that sounded the same, and the ones with the same meaning. The participants were asked to recall these words immediately after and the obtained result showed that errors had occurred with the similar sounding words but not the similar meaning words.

  1. 'Biological explanations of schizophrenia tell us all we need to know about this disorder.(TM)

    Crespa et al (2007) analysed 76 genes, 26 of which showed signs of positive selection during human evolutionary history. This result lends weight to the idea that genes are linked with schizophrenia (which implements the biological explanation), but also, the results help to explain how prevalence rates have remained at 0.2%- 2% (DSM IV, 1994)

  2. Report on Psychological Research into Eyewitness Testimony

    in the film as they had originally been suggested the idea a week previous. Over this time the memory of the barn had become imprinted in their accurate memory, until they believed they actually saw the barn in the incident.

  1. Psychology Retrospective Interference coursework

    After 5 minutes, say, "Your 5 minutes are up." Condition 2 and 3 (Synonym and Antonym Condition) a) Seat the participants on a chair with a desk in a classroom. b) Give them the standardized instructions to read. (See Appendix) c) Give the participants in condition 2 and the participants in condition 3 the standardized instructions with the number


    This is evidence of retroactive interference. But when the participants were then given a cue to which list to recall the participants remember about 70% of the words regardless of how many lists they were given.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work