Contribution and cultural conditions that gave rise to the biological perspective.

Authors Avatar

THE BIOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE

DEVELOPMENT AND CULTURAL CONTEXTS

1.Contribution and cultural conditions that gave rise to the biological perspective

SCIENTIFIC DISCOVERIES ABOUT BIOLOGICAL PROCESSES

-Dualism : the view first attributed to Descarte’s, because the mind is separate from the body

                : definition-mind and body are 2 different things

-1745  :Julien de La Mettrie came with one crucial insight almost accidentaly. He got a fever

            and found out thathis physical condition affected his mental state as well as his

            physical state

  • therefore he came with the conclusion that physical state affects mental state

- French doctor Paul Broca (1861) encountered a case in which a man lost the ability to speak

  coherently after a head injury

   -from this he came with the term Localisation of function, which means the belief that

    specific parts of the brain are responsible for specific psychological processes

CULTURAL VARIATION IN THE ACCEPTANCE OF THE BIOLOGICAL

PERSPECTIVE  

The biological approach is scientific (grounded in hard scienceof biology with its objective, materialistic subject matter and experimental methodology), deterministic (it follows casual laws) and reductionist (something complicated can be explained in simple way). The culture which will not like this would be unlikely to accept the biological approach.

2.Contribution of the biological perspective to the scientific study of behaviour, and its current standing

BIOLOGICAL CORRELATES OF BEHVIOUR

-emotion is love, anger, fear etc.

-the cause of emotion is physical

-Schachter and Singer (1962) came with the theory Cognitive labelling 

In the experiment done by Schachter and Singer in 1962, which is called Cognitive labelling, there is need of arousal and labelling to get emotion. If we are aroused, we will attempt to label it in some way. Emotion occurs when we label our arousal in a particular way. They have done an experiment. They had three groups of people. Each group had different independent variable (IV;variable that you as an experimenter want to change). First group was given an adrenaline and told what the consequences are. Second group was given an adrenaline but they were not told what the consequences are. And the third group was given a placebo ( it is a pill, but it does not influence us. It can be for example a vitamin and it is given to a people with words that it is some kind of pill which will cure them for example. And they believe to it and they can change from psychological view).All three groups were placed into „angry“ or „happy“ environment. Each person’s behaviour was observed and each of them was interviewed afterwards. The results were that, first group did what was expected , because they knew what the consequences are - they explained their arousal in terms of the drug. The second group experienced changing emotions, they experienced anger and happines. Even without knowing that they got adrenaline. They though it is some kind of drug but what kind of drug they did not know. And the third group had no significant change in emotions.

But the problem with this experiment was that they did not ask the participants what was the emotional state of the participants before they have done the experiment. IT was also unethical, because they gave them drugs. Therefore we can‘t do the experiment( no replication). It lacks of ecological validity- the environment around them could influence the results). And lastly if we believe in assumptios of biological psychology, then the cognitive labelling must have a biological basis.

In this case we meet here with independent and dependent variable. It is manipulation of Independent variable (IV) to determine the effect it has on Dependent variable (DV).We change IV to observe what effect it has on DV. In psychology when we form an experiment we consider two things. Independent and dependent variable.. Independent variable is the variable that you as an experimenter want to change. The experimenter control this. Dependent variable is the thing that we want to expect to change as a result of changing independent variable. The variable that we observe and measure. Dependent variable must always be a quantifiable data (data that can be represented in numbers). The IV in the research done by Schachter and Singer is expectations of participants and DV is emotional response to „happy + angry“ environment.

GENETIC CONTRIBUTIONS TO EXPLANATIONS OF BEHAVIOUR

There are two methods which I can mention here to show genetic predisposition. Genetic predisposition means that if physiological characteristics can be passed from one generation to another, therefore  same true is for psychological characteristsics. Both of these methods are interested in twins.

Gottesman (1991) and his Correlational study. Monozygotic twins (MZ) and Dizygotic twins (DZ) reared together (shared the same environment). If one twin has schizofrenia, then what is the chance that the other twin will develop it. The results are that in MZ twins it is 48% and in DZ twins it is 17%. The difference between MZ and DZ is that MZ has identical structure and are from one egg. And DZ twins has similar structure, like normal sisters and brothers.

Join now!

Loehlin (1992) was interested in MZ twins only. MZ twins reared separately and together. Loehlin compared the personalities of MZ twins reared apart with those reared together. The results are that MZ reared together were 51% Extraversion and 46% Neuroticism.And MZ reared apart were 38% Extraversion and 38% Neuroticism.

FRAMEWORK

1.Key concepts

HOW PHYSIOLOGICAL CONCEPTS SUCH AS THE CENTRAL NERVOUS SYTEM

AFFECT BEHAVIOUR

The brain consists of 100 billion neurones (a cell that is part of nervous system and that carries an electric charge to other neurones). These connections of neurones are in the cortex (the pink, ...

This is a preview of the whole essay