• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss alternative models of memory

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Discuss alternative models of memory The multi-store model of memory (MSM) was proposed by Atkinson and Shriffin (1968); it is based on the principle that there are separate stores for memory: sensory, short term and long term. However other approaches and models have been developed with research evidence that contradicts the MSM and provides us with insight as to how our memory works. The working memory model (WMM) was developed by Baddely and Hitch (1974). The model refers to the part of memory that you use when working on a complex task that requires you to store information as you go along. The main difference to the MSM is that its ideas formulate from the short term memory (STM) having more than one store therefore avoiding the MSM's criticism of being reductionist. The model suggests two separate stores for visual and auditory processes. Evidence for this was found by participants doing two tasks that are both visual at once - their performance was poorer than doing them separately. ...read more.

Middle

Logie (1995) divided this into two stores; visuo cache as the main store, and the inner scribe for spatial relations. Baddeley et al. (1975) demonstrated the existence of the different systems; he found a verbal task was less difficult for participants therefore showing that it used two systems, visuo spatial and phonological loop. This again supports this model is better than the MSM as it reflects more parts to the STM. Lastly is the episodic buffer, added by Baddeley (2000). It was added because it seemed the model needed a general store for information and importantly, it links information from the model with LTM. Dolcos et al (2007) used fMRI scans to show the existence of all these separate stores. They observed dual task performance and found different areas of the prefrontal cortex to be activated when performing two tasks affecting the same store as predicted by the WMM. However D'Esposito (2007) suggested working memory might not exist as a separate system therefore going against the whole model. ...read more.

Conclusion

researched transfer appropriate processing and found participants recalled words that rhymed (phonemic processing) better than words that had been deeply processed. This research therefore goes against the LOP approach and it could be argued that performance depends on what you need to recall and that there are other explanations for memory. However Craik and Lockhart (1990) recognised this problem and suggested 'depth' refers to greater processing within the relevant domain. Another major criticism of the LOP approach is the fact it becomes a circular definition e.g. something is remembered if its deeply processed and if its deeply processed, then you will be able to recall it better. This criticism makes the LOP seem reductionist but depth has been described to include organisation, distinctiveness, elaboration and effort; therefore showing depth is more complex. In conclusion, although research has been found to support and refute both the WMM and the LOP approach, both theories cannot be known for sure if they are correct. The MSM is also at fault, therefore the mystery of our memory still remains; the ghost in the machine, we can observe the actions (machine) but never see inside the mind. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology essays

  1. SHORT TERM MEMORY

    This shows that the results for this group are very close and hereby reliable. However for group 2, which has a median result of 6.5 thus showing a close relationship with the mean result (7), and a close result to one of the mode result.

  2. Investigating the short-term memory

    = 10.5 Ed2 ? (N-1) N=number of participants 10.52 ? (10-1) 110.25 ? 9 =12.25 ?12.25 = 3.5 APPENDIX 2 Working out of averages for group 2 Mean Male > 5 + 5 + 9 + 9 + 8 = 36 out of a possible 50 Female > 9 + 7 + 6 + 6

  1. Investigating the effects of organisation on learning

    Participant Words recalled (xa) Participant Words recalled (xb) A01 12 B01 14 A02 14 B02 14 A03 18 B03 15 A04 14 B04 18 A05 15 B05 20 A06 16 B06 15 A07 15 B07 18 A08 18 B08

  2. Outline and Evaluate the Multi Store Model of Memory and One Alternative Model

    Tyler and his colleagues claimed this as proof that retention depended on processing effort, not processing level. Taking this into account Craik and Lockhart (1986) adjusted their original model idea by suggesting, with evidence to back up their hypothesis, that other factors may also affect the rate of retention, such as elaboration and distinctiveness of words.

  1. Can we prove the existence of the rehearsal loop by blocking rehearsal time with ...

    counting backwards in threes from the number 58. This is the technique I will use as a basis of my mini-cognitive research project. AIM: To test the existence of the rehearsal loop by preventing it from its task with an interference task during the rehearsal time.

  2. Levels Of Processing

    Word list is used to enable participants to recall the words they remember. I tried to pick the words which are relatively common and everyone would know their meaning. I also kept them between 3 and 7 letters long (the average number of items a person can hold in the memory is 5)

  1. What experimental evidence is there for the existence of multiple memory systems?

    The Echoic store is a transient auditory store, holding relatively unprocessed input. It is similar to the iconic store except it refers to auditory rather than visual stimuli. Treisman (1964) conducted experiments in this area and found that the temporal duration of unattended auditory information in echoic storage is about two seconds.

  2. Describe and evaluate models of memory.

    The results may also have been influenced by individual or participant variables, but this research does have good reliability. The capacity of short-term memory refers to the amount of information that can be stored at one time. Miller (1956) suggested that most people store about seven independent or discrete items in short-term memory.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work