• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Evaluate the Multi-store model of memory.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Zainab Bashar 12xF Multi-store model of memory Q) Evaluate the Multi-store model of memory. The multi-store model of memory is an explanation of how memory processes work. The information ?processing models of memory all share similar features in terms of the structures of the memory system. For example, there is a temporary store where information can be briefly kept while some other operation is perfomed, this is known as the short ?term memory which can only handle limited amount of information at any one time. There is a permanent store where information will remain permanently unless there is some damage or disruption to the system; this is known as long term memory which can handle limitless amounts of information can be stored for long periods of time. The multi-store model is a psychological model proposed in 1968 by Richard Atkinson and Richard Shiffrin as proposal for the structure of the memory. ...read more.

Middle

The Atkinson and Shiffrin model is called a structural model because it focuses on the storage components of the memory system. Some of the control processes required to manipulate and transform the information as it flows through the system .This include encoding, retrieval strategies and rehearsal. Rehearsal is the most important processes for their model because information can be circulated within the short-term memory store and passed on to long-term memory store. One strength, of the multi-store model is that it could be considered high in "face validity". Face Validity concerns whether or not it is a reasonable explanation (i.e., does it seems to make sense or fit with our experience). The multi-store model makes sense because most people experience only being able to remember some things for a few seconds, and rehearsal seems to enable memories to be stored for longer. ...read more.

Conclusion

One weakness, of the multi-store model is a case study of brain damaged participants such as Clive Wearing show that the Multi-store Model is an overview of how memory actually works. Clive Wearing suffered brain damage to many brain areas, including his hippocampi, when the herpes simplex virus attacked his brain. Clive was similar to H.M. in that he could not remember new information for more than a few seconds; however, he could learn new skills. This suggests that there is a separate long term memory for skills (Procedural Memory). Clive could also remember facts about his life previous to the illness, but could not remember any experiences. This meant that repeatedly had revelations that he was conscious for the first time. This suggests that there are separate long term memory stores for facts (semantic memory) and experiences (episodic memory). ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Describe and evaluate the Multi-store Model of memory.

    3 star(s)

    Atkinson and Shiffrin believed that memory traces in STM are fragile and can be lost within about 30 seconds unless rehearsed/ repeated. Information here can also be lost through displacement, due to the duration. Material that is rehearsed is passed onto the LTM store where it can remain for a

  2. SHORT TERM MEMORY

    word is called out, and the list will be read out twice". The stopwatch was started simultaneously as the first word was read out by the experimenter, and a 3 seconds gap was given between each word in the list.

  1. Describe and evaluate the multistore model of memory

    He found the average span for digits was 9.3 items and for letters 7.3, suggesting that STM capacity is affected by what we have to remember. Miller (1956) also investigated the capacity of STM and found it to be between 5-9 or 7+/- 2 chunks.

  2. Describe and Evaluate the MultiStore Model of Memory

    The primary and recency effect found by Glanzer and Cunitz suggests the existence of 2 separate stores. The first few words on the list go into the LTM store because they are sufficiently rehearsed, the last few words are held in the STM store from where they are last recalled.

  1. Investigating the short-term memory

    Another EV that could have affected the DV is the time of the day the experiment took place, as in the morning, participants tend to be more alert than in the afternoon. The control for this EV was that the experiment was conducted in the morning, when all participants are the most alert.

  2. Alternatives to the multi store model of memory.

    This is called the dual task technique. However, if you do two things at the same time and one is visual using the VSSP. And the other involves sound using the PL then there is no interference. You do them as well simultaneously as you would do them separately this

  1. Outline and evaluate the multi store model of memory.

    It also suggests that the transfer process is located in the hippocampus. However, although this case study supports the Multi-model store idea, and has much mundane realism, it is dangerous to generalise from one study to be others, and because this is a retrospective study, researchers tend to only notice information which fits their theories.

  2. Outline and evaluate the multi-store model

    They found that 80% of people remembered after three second and 10% of people remembered after 18 seconds. They concluded that information disappears from short-term memory when rehearsal is prevented.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work