• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explanations of conformity. Conformity is defined by David Myers (1999) as a change in behaviour or belief as a result of real or imagined group pressure.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Conformity is defined by David Myers (1999) as "a change in behaviour or belief as a result of real or imagined group pressure." This definition focuses upon the kind of experience that most people have had at one time or another: the feeling that others are putting pressure on us to change our minds or behaviour. However Zimbardo (1995) defined it as a "tendency for people to adopt the behaviour, attitudes and values of other members of a reference group." This definition proposes that we tend to go along with those people that we compare ourselves to when evaluating ourselves. According to the Duel process dependency model (Duetsch and Gerard 1955), there are two powerful psychological needs that lead people to conform to social norms. The Normative social influence involves conforming in order to be liked or accepted by a certain group, although not necessarily because a we believe the things they are doing or saying. The tendency to conform comes from the need to be some form of agreement as far as rules, morals and behaviours because otherwise there would be issues among the members. ...read more.

Middle

A challenge to the Dual process dependency model is the Social Identity theory as it relates to the claim that the Model underestimates the psychological importance that people attach to being part of a group. According to Turner (1991) this sense of 'belonging' to a group makes us conform to its social norms. In other words, we identify with a group, define ourselves as having category membership and then adopt the values of that group. For example, moving from a school to university and defining yourself as a student, observing how other students conduct themselves and behaving in a similar way is caused by a process called referential informational influence and Turner proposed that there were three stages involved in this process. The first stage is where individuals acknowledge their membership of the group; the second stage is where they then learn the group's norms and the final stage is where they behave according to these norms. Therefore, reverent social influence sets the conditions for normative and informational influence to be most effective. ...read more.

Conclusion

Moscovici proposed that minorities produce a greater amount of cognitive activity that majorities. However, Martin (2006), looked at the effects of in-groups and out-group minorities on private and public levels of influence and found that in-groups have more influence in public however out-groups have a much, maybe even more, influence in private. He concluded that the effects of internalisation may be masked as people don't want to publically align themselves with an out-group. Another criticism of Mascovici's theory is by Mackie (1987) who claimed that we process more information about majority- false consensus effect. Another explanation of conformity is the Social Crypto Amnesia effect when a group cannot remember when the majority was once the minority. This is when conversion takes place when the Zeitgeist has changed and by the time the change has occurred people have forgotten the original source of the change but it is actually due to the minority influence creating a Snowball effect which was created by Van Avermaet (1996). The Snowball effect is when the minority becomes the majority after people begin to agree with the minority. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Social Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

The description of the various explanations in this essay starts very well, and there is some analysis through contrasting explanations.
The second half may not be considered relevant by an examiner though, unless the question asks for a comparison of majority and minority influence. Instead, there could have been discussion of Kelman's types of conformity and how these interact with normative and informational influence.
It is interesting that the writer has not chosen to discuss any research evidence for the theories - this would be a successful alternative approach to evaluation. Studies such as Asch, Sherif and Crutchfield could be used to illustrate the different processes and draw out issues with the explanations. It would also benefit from some real life examples to show how the explanations work in practice.
Ultimately, despite the accuracy of much of the description, this essay lacks analysis, possibly because there wasn't an analytical title.

Marked by teacher Jo Wilcox 17/02/2012

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Social Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The effect of the Level of Processing on the amount of information recalled

    4 star(s)

    Participants were given lists of words of varying lengths, and asked to listen out for and remember words that began with a certain letter. (For eg. "G") Craik and Watkins gave their subjects an unexpected quiz on the words at the end.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    "Describe the main features of conformity and obedience analyse two conformity and obedience studies ...

    Firstly I will explain an experiment carried out by Milgram. He placed a newspaper advertisement offering $4.50 for an hours work, in response to this an individual turns up to take part in a Psychology experiment investigating memory and learning.

  1. Free essay

    Asch - Conformity

    5 star(s)

    Participants answered in the same order on each round, with the real participant answering either last or second to last. On the first round, all confederates stated the same matching line. Likewise, on the second round the confederates again unanimously stated the same correct answer.

  2. Experiment investigating conformity in students.

    The same result was shown for alcohol consumption, 92% had tasted alcohol, 43% said that the drank alcohol because they thought that it was "Cool". Conformity amongst this age range will be interesting. Not only will it show evidence for statistical purposes but also will be an eye opener perhaps

  1. Critically Evaluate Research Into Conformity, Compliance and Obedience.

    The na�ve participant was led to believe that just like themselves the confederates were too participants. Asch measured the number of times each participant conformed to the majority view.

  2. Critically evaluate how psychological theories, concepts, and explanations have been employed in the psychology ...

    We cannot be sure that an addiction apparent in a rat follows the same pattern in a human, however these results do show similarities, and a plausible future for further research investigating human addiction (West 2006). It appears that social learning theory provides a more conclusive explanation as to why

  1. The Concepts Of Conformity And Obedience

    group, because of this; social groups can place considerable pressure on individuals to conform to group norms. Sherif (1935) showed how group members came to conform to social norms. Using the auto kinetic effect he presented three male subjects with a stationary pinpoint of light in a dark room.

  2. Obedience & Conformity: The Situation In Abu Ghraib

    In April 2004, Abu Ghraib mission took a turn to the worse when CBS television and The New Yorkers magazine published details of the on going abuse in Abu Ghraib. Photos and Videos were leaked including graphic photography showing guards beating prisoners and forcing them into humiliating and stressful positions.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work