• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How reliable is Eyewitness testimony

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Part 1 - How reliable is Eyewitness testimony? The Reconstructive nature of memory - Schemas and Stereotypes The reconstructive nature of memory is related to the schema theory. A schema is a package of memory that is organized and developed throughout our lives. Schemas are stored in long term memory. Most people have similar schemas and this was recognized by Bower, Black and Turner (1979) when they asked several people to recall the schema for the most important things they do when they go out to a restaurant for a meal. They found out that most people put the same main aspects in their schemas. Bartlett's theory of Reconstructive Memory is crucial to an understanding of the reliability of eye witness testimony (EWT) as he suggested that recall is subject to personal interpretation dependent on our learnt or cultural norms and values- the way we make sense of our world. In other words, we tend to see and in particular interpret and recall what we see according to what we expect and assume is 'normal' in a given situation. Bartlett tested this theory using different stories to illustrate that memory is an active process and subject to individual interpretation or construction. Bartlett found out that when he asked the participants to recall the story twenty hours after they first read it then the story changed considerably. ...read more.

Middle

The data is often incomplete and therefore recall is prone to be influenced by schemas and stereotypes. Under normal conditions, how do people recognize faces? Recognition can be unreliable partly because of the surprise element, nobody necessarily expects to witness a crime and also because of changes in context and appearance. In a brief glimpse, the face of a person is not the main focus of attention. Familiarity is a large part of face recognition. We are more likely to recognize somebody that we know rather than a total stranger. Bruce and Young (1986) have proposed a model for face recognition which suggests that there are two different mechanisms for familiar and unfamiliar face recognition. There is evidence from the study of brain-damaged patients to support this idea. It has been suggested that the recognition of unfamiliar faces involves feature detection, whereas familiar face recognition involves configural recognition. The effects of emotional factors of memory An eye witness will probably be in a high state of emotion at the time the crime is committed, and the psychological evidence suggests this may well influence their recall. Flashbulb memories are created at times of high emotion and many people claim that such memories are very accurate and there is some evidence to support this view. ...read more.

Conclusion

to try to identify who it was they thought they saw at the scene of the crime. The problem with this method of identification is that there is a large amount of pressure on the victim to pick one person who they think is responsible and this may cause him or her to make false accusations or recall the wrong things because the people in the identity parade all have similar features. Interview techniques The home office issued guidelines recommending that police interviews should proceed from free recall to general open ended questions, concluding with more specific closing questions. The basic cognitive interview was also formed after the consideration of the bullet points above, which basically reports on the time of the crime, where it happened, and anything else that they can think of surrounding the incident and then the information is fragmented and 'picked at' to find any vital clues or evidence. Conclusion There are implications from psychological research for improvements in the collection and use of eye witness testimony. Police might develop the basic cognitive interview by increasing contextual cues to enhance recall, minimising distractions and reducing eyewitness anxiety. Psychologists can be used as expert witnesses in criminal trials to advise jurors on the reliability of eyewitness testimony. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Is eyewitness testimony reliable?

    3 star(s)

    Clifford and Hollin (1981) concluded that violence has a negative recall on memory, despite most of us believing that violence actually improves recall. Clifford and Hollin showed participants video footage of a man either stealing a woman's handbag and roughly pushing her against a wall or asking her for directions.

  2. Peer reviewed

    To what extent does research support the view that eyewitness testimony is unreliable?

    3 star(s)

    However, research into so-called 'flashbulb memories' does show that in certain circumstances memory can be intensified by emotionally charged events. As a result of evidence from eye-witness studies, in 1976 the Devlin Report recommended that judges should instruct juries that it is not safe to convict on a single eye-witness

  1. SHORT TERM MEMORY

    BRIEFING/CONSENT FORM Name of Project: An investigation into memory coding for words with Similar sound and meaning in the Short-term memory. And what effect a distraction can have with the overall result. You are being invited to participate in a study where the coding of information is being investigated and how it is placed into our short-term memory.

  2. Memory and Eyewitness Testimony

    when participants had to rest during the interval between learning and recall forgetting was least, forgetting increased when participants had to learn unrelated material during the interval and forgetting was at its maximum when they were asked to learn adjectives similar in meaning to the original list.

  1. Report on Psychological Research into Eyewitness Testimony

    story, across a spectrum; this may have altered the results without explanation- people who understood a certain part of the story better than others were more likely to remember it. Further investigation was done into schemas in 1981 by Brewer and Treyens whose aim it was to find the effects of schemas on visual memory.

  2. The Effects of leading questions on Eyewitness Testimony

    This reduced the likelihood of participants giving answers that they believed to be incorrect or misleading to affect the results of the experiment. Also, these types of experiments tend to have low ecological validity, as high levels of control can lead to artificial situations, which make the results less applicable to every-day life.

  1. A counselling Interview

    This referred to; ''in terms of what clients want to achieve and what you are prepared to offer....contracts are important in establishing the foci for the work..'' (Culley, 1991) As we entered the 'story' stage, I adopted an open posture and became very conscious of my own presence and body language.

  2. "It is clear that eyewitness testimony is entirely unreliable".To what extent does psychological research ...

    A second study which challenges the reliability of eyewitness testimony is the Loftus et al. study which was carried out in 1987. Participants were shown one of two versions of a restaurant scene on video. In one version, a man pointed a gun at the cashier and she gave him money.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work