• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

OUTLINE ONE OR MORE EXPLANATIONS OF FORGETTING IN LONG-TERM MEMORY AND CONSIDER TO WHAT EXTENT THESE ARE SUPPORTED BY PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

OUTLINE ONE OR MORE EXPLANATIONS OF FORGETTING IN LONG-TERM MEMORY AND CONSIDER TO WHAT EXTENT THESE ARE SUPPORTED BY PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH. There are three different explanations to forgetting in the long-term memory. These are; the interference theory and retrieval failure and cue-dependant forgetting. The decay theory outlined in the short-term memory section can also apply to why people forget things in the long-term memory. The interference theory explains forgetting in terms of either proactive or retroactive interference. Proactive interference is when you try and learn something new and past learning interferes whereas retroactive interference is when you try and learn something new but that interferes with past learning. ...read more.

Middle

So it may be that the interference effect may not show what is really in the memory, it was shown by the results that the participants remembered more words with a cue, this is known as cue-dependant forgetting. This therefore suggests that it is possible to recover from interference. The retrieval failure and cue-dependant forgetting explanation to forgetting in the long-term memory suggests that the reason why people forget is because they cannot access the memories that are stored. And that people can remember these things when they are given a cue, there are either external or internal cues. Abernethy did some research to support external cues or context dependant learning/forgetting. ...read more.

Conclusion

Other research on this is by Miles and Hardman who found that when people learned a list of words while on an exercise bike they remembered them better when they exercised again then when they was at rest. But does this explanation relate to everyday memory, everyday memory is more procedural. Many of the studies into cue-dependent forgetting are laboratory-based so this may affect the results and draw them further away from real life. Such as after a while remembering how to play a game like ping pong you may not remember all the rules and such but you remember most and re-learn the rest, although there is the re-learning to do cues don't explain it. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology essays

  1. SHORT TERM MEMORY

    Any difference in recall will be due to chance factors. This means that any difference in the dependant variable, this being the recall amount is not due to the independent variable and that it is due to chance factors. Therefore the distraction of music has not affected the results.

  2. Discuss biological and psychological explanations of depression

    Rewards stem from different sources; e.g. important relationships with others or the esteem and satisfaction to be gained through employment. People who become depressed because of a major loss (e.g. being made redundant) may be reinforced in being depressed by the sympathy and understanding shown by other people.

  1. Cue dependent Forgetting. This experiment investigates Tulvings theory of cue dependent forgetting, with ...

    Previous research was done as a laboratory experiment. Repeated measures design was used because there was only one group of 8 participants; the same group is tested in two different condition. In List A, students were asked to recall at the same place where they memorise the words.

  2. Investigating the short-term memory

    This will ensure that the investigation still meets the BPS guidelines. This will also protect the participants. Participant confidentiality is assured because information from participants will not be shared with anyone else. Also, participants will be referred to as numbers not name to ensure anonymity.

  1. Investigating the effects of organisation on learning

    Journal of General Psychology, 49, pp. 229-240. BOWER, G.H., CLARK, M.C., LESGOLD, A.M. & WINZENZ, D. (1969). Hierarchical retrieval schemes in recall of categorized word lists. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 8, pp. 323-343. COOLICAN, H. (2004). Research Methods and Statistics in Psychology.

  2. Report on Psychological Research into Eyewitness Testimony

    Whilst the second group were asked a misleading question involving a false piece of information ("How fast was the white sports car going when it passed the barn when travelling along the country road?"). After one week had passed, all the participants returned to the laboratory to be asked ten more questions.

  1. Psychology Retrospective Interference coursework

    the findings of the experiment and individual differences are difficult to control. One extraneous variable is that participants may understand the instructions differently. This was dealt by having detailed standardized instructions for all participants. If there was any question, the experimenter would be there to answer them.

  2. the affect interference has on the recall of words

    Such prior learning influences the qualitative and quantitative character of the new learning process. Such transfer effects may be positive or negative, depending on whether prior experiences facilitate or impair the new learning process. The second concept is retroactive interference.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work