• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Piaget and Vygotsky theory. Compare and contrast two theories of cognitive development and discuss how they impact on the contemporary early years practice.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Compare and contrast two theories of cognitive development and discuss how they impact on the contemporary early years practice. Part 1 Piaget believed that children learn through their own activity and experience. He claimed that children construct their own knowledge by giving meaning to the people, places and things in their world. He was fond of the expression "construction is superior to instruction" (Merrill 1992). By this he meant that children learn best when they are actually doing the work themselves and creating their own understanding of what's going on. Piaget believed children need every possible opportunity to do things for themselves. For example children might be interested in how things grow; this will increase the child's knowledge base. However if the child has the opportunity to actually plant something, the process of digging, watering, observing and actually experiencing growing things will help the child to construct a knowledge of growing things that he/she cannot achieve just by looking at the pictures. According to Piaget, babies are born with the ability to adapt and learn from the environment. ...read more.

Middle

He suggests that language is an important tool in children's learning and they increasingly use it to guide their thinking. Vygotsky argued that Piaget ignored the major impact of cultural sign system on development by focusing on the child as solitary thinker. He thinks that concepts, language, voluntary attention and memory are mental function which come from the culture and begins with interaction between the child and another person. Each of these functions appears twice in a child's development, first as shared between the child and the adult (social) and then within the child (psychological). Vygotsky's work shows that social and cognitive development work together and builds on each other. Like Piaget he also believed that knowledge is constructed from personal experiences, however he thought that the personal and social experience cannot be separated. The world children live in is shaped by their families, communities, socioeconomic status, education and culture. One of the most important concepts of Vygotsky's theory is that of the zone of proximal development. ...read more.

Conclusion

Sensitivity to children's readiness to learn: Piaget believed that children's learning experience I built on their current thinking. Teachers watch and listen to their students, introducing experiencing that allow them to practice newly schemas and challenge their incorrect ways of thinking. Acceptance of individual differences: Piaget believed that all children go through the same stages but at different rates. Therefore teachers should plan activities for individuals and small groups rather than for the whole class. According to Vygoysky's theory, children's level of knowledge is increased by interacting with other children and imitating their parent or teachers. Vygotsky's theory suggests that there are three ways in which learning is passed along to individuals. Imitative learning is the first, where the child copies another person. Second is instructed learning, where a child recalls direction given by a teacher and then puts it into play, and the third is collaborative learning. Collaborative learning happens when a peer group cooperates to learn or achieve a specific goal while working to understand one another. In nurseries children often talk aloud to themselves as they try to understand something. This self speech helps them to work things out in their own minds. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a star student thought of this essay

3 star(s)

Response to the question

The writer gives a strong response to the question, clearly outlining two theories of cognitive development (Piaget’s and Vygotsky’s), as well as analysing their effects on contemporary early years practice, generally the critical analysis is of a high standard but ...

Read full review

Response to the question

The writer gives a strong response to the question, clearly outlining two theories of cognitive development (Piaget’s and Vygotsky’s), as well as analysing their effects on contemporary early years practice, generally the critical analysis is of a high standard but in places the student would benefit from more depth in their description to hit the top marks. The essay question requires the student to “compare and contrast” which is done successfully – e.g. Lev Vygotsky also believed that children are active seekers of knowledge, but he emphasized that rich, social and cultural contexts strongly affect their thinking - this example shows that the student is not just describing one and then the other, but can analyse the similarities and differences between the two theories. The second requirement of the essay was to discuss the implications in early learning settings for these theories which are also addressed clearly (e.g. Discovery learning, acceptance of individual differences, collaborative learning), I am slightly wary of the structure used here (namely the use of sub-headings ‘Part 1’ and ‘Part 2’ to separate these two sections) since in a typical high-grade essay sub-headings are not necessary and the two sections should flow naturally, as more of a discussion – for example, begin the paragraph with ‘Both these theories have real-world implications for early learning settings…” - However, this will depend on specific requirements of individual essays.

Level of analysis

As mentioned, the level of analysis is generally strong, the student follows a nice structure of “point, explanation, and example” (see paragraph on discovery learning for a nice demonstration of this) – this is a fail-proof way to ensure you are providing enough depth in your essay, for each item you want to discuss name the point (e.g. discovery learning), give an explanation for it (e.g. important for a child to experience the things they are learning about), and give an example (e.g. see a cow in real life!), to fully ensure you are both clear for the reader, and the reader is certain you understand the concept yourself. Whilst the student’s concluding statements for ‘Part 1’ are strong (e.g. In conclusion Vygotsky agreed with the development that Piaget proposed. However being a Marxist he strongly believed that human beings can only be understood in the context of their social and historical environment) since they summarise the information well and draw to close, this is lacking for ‘Part 2’. Whilst, implications for both theories are discussed there is no finalising statement to draw the entire essay to a close, which is an important part of any essay structure.

Quality of writing

Generally the spelling and grammar is good, although there are some occasional problems – for example, the sentence “Teachers watch and listen to their students, introducing experiencing that allow them to practice newly schemas and challenge their incorrect ways of thinking” obviously contains silly mistakes that could be easily be fixed by proof-reading, but in this case has instead led to sentence that makes no sense to the reader. Correct technical and psychological terminology is used, e.g. symbolic play, sensory motor stage, concrete operational, etc. however this could at times use more explanation, for instance in the concrete operation stage, the writer states that the child understands conservation – I would suggest following this with a brief explanation of what conservation is as it is important to assume that your reader would not know.


Did you find this review helpful? Join our team of reviewers and help other students learn

Reviewed by lcarter17 07/03/2012

Read less
Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    In this essay I am going to contrast and compare three approaches in psychology ...

    4 star(s)

    which increases the likelihood that a behaviour will be repeated' (Williamson, M., Cardweel, M., and Flanagan, C., 2007: 3) The fact of experiments like this have been carried out in animals is one of the biggest limitations in behaviourism. Human beings are far more complex than animals.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Psychology Revision Notes - list of major experiments

    3 star(s)

    It was clear that there was considerable support for the hypothesis that high levels of stress negatively impacted on the accuracy of EWM. Age- Parker and Carranza (1989) Compared the ability of primary school children and college students to correctly identify a target individual following a slide sequence of a mock crime.

  1. Critically assess Piaget's theory of cognitive development

    This is the understanding that objects can still exist even when they are hidden. Piaget investigated this theory by observing his own children when he hid an object from them. He found that a child will not search for an object hidden from view between the ages of 0-5 months,

  2. A comparison of the ability of males and females to control their attentional processes

    They were selected using Opportunity Sampling in the 6th form social area. The study used the same researcher throughout the experiment; an 18 year old female in school uniform. It was decided that the researcher should be in school uniform so as to not intimidate the participants.

  1. Recall in Memory Using Mnemonics

    Descriptive statistics were used to examine the data further. The central tendency was found and the mean was calculated. The mean was used instead of the mode or median because it gives a more specific score and is more representative, however, it can be distorted by freak values.

  2. Memory: Rote Rehearsal and Mental Imagery.

    Null Hypothesis: There will not be a significant difference between the number of words recalled by participants who are asked to form a mental image of the word pairs compared with participants who were asked to recall the word using rote rehearsal. Any differences will be down to chance alone.

  1. Investigating the short-term memory

    (See appendix 3). Deception Where the participants of a study are misled or wrongly informed about the aims of the research. This may sometimes be the case in an experiment, as the experimenter may not want the participants to adjust their behaviour to fit the expectations of what the experimenter is looking for.

  2. Evaluate 3 Approaches to treating Mental Disorders: Psychodynamic, Biological and Behavioural Approach.

    the unconscious, psychoanalysis in its classic form can be a very lengthy process often involving 2 to 5 sessions per week for several years. The approach assumes that the reduction of symptoms alone is relatively insignificant if the underlying conflict is not resolved, more neurotic symptoms will simply be substituted.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work