• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20
  21. 21

Psychology Retrospective Interference coursework

Extracts from this document...


Introduction This coursework was based on Cognitive Psychology. Cognitive Psychologists examine internal mental processes and topics include perception, learning, memory, and forgetting. This coursework focused specifically on memory and forgetting. It is believed that there are two memory stores; short-term and long-term memory. This current research was on long-term memory (LTM) and the information that is stored in LTM is each person's knowledge of the world, their past life, and their plans for the future. Forgetting in LTM has been explained in many ways such as trace decay theory. Trace decay theory states that memories can automatically decay over time. There is little evidence to support this explanation; therefore, this theory could be questioned. Another explanation for forgetting in LTM is retrieval failure which states that forgetting occurs when information is available in LTM, but is not accessible or is not able to be "retrieved" from memory. However, there is an alternative explanation known as the interference theory which states that forgetting occurs because similar memories interfere with and disrupt one another by retroactive and proactive interference. Retroactive interference refers to new memories disrupting the recall of old memories and alternatively, proactive interference refers to old memories disrupting the recall of new memories. Jacoby et al (2001) suggested that there are two possible reasons for proactive interference. One is that there might be problems in retrieving the correct response from memory and another reason might be due to the great strength of the incorrect response learned originally such as bias or habit. Therefore, interference occurs because the correct response is too weak or because the incorrect response is too strong. In 1931, McGeoch and McDonald conducted an experiment to study interference in LTM. All participants learned a list of ten adjectives perfectly. Participants were then divided into groups to do different activities before being asked to recall the original ten adjectives. Some participants that spent 10 minutes resting had the highest recall of 4.50 adjectives on average followed by 3.68 for those who learned 3-digit numbers, 2.58 for nonsense syllables group, and 2.17 for unrelated adjectives group. ...read more.


Findings of this experiment show that the synonym group recalled in average more adjectives than other two conditions. The test results also showed that the observed value of U, 14.5, was less than the critical value of U, 27. Therefore, the findings of this experiment are unlikely to occur due to chance or random miscalculation since the probability of the resting condition and the synonym condition occurring is 5% or less. For that reason, the null hypothesis is rejected and the experimental hypothesis is accepted. The results table is generated to show the central tendency and dispersion between the resting condition and the synonym condition. The table showed that on the whole, the mean, mode, and median of the resting condition is significantly higher than the synonym condition. Moreover, the outcome of standard deviation of the synonym condition is higher than resting condition. This means that the results collected from the raw data (number of words which each participants remember) is more dispersed in the synonym condition. Relationship to background research The results of this experiment generated findings that strongly supports the results of McGeoch and McDonald. This experiment found that the number of adjectives recalled is most likely to be affected if a certain activity is occurring between the time interval of learning and time of recalling. McGeoch and McDonald examined many different activities including nonsense syllables and numbers whereas this experiment examined specifically on only three conditions. Similar to the original findings, the more similar information was fed, the more likely the recalling is to be affected. Thus, the synonym group of this research had the lowest recall rate of 6.4 average number of adjectives compared to the antonym, 7.4, and the resting condition, 8.7. The findings prove to be comparable to those of McGeoch and McDonald's with 4.50 average recalls of ten adjectives in the resting condition, 1.25 in the synonym, and 1.83 in the antonym. ...read more.


The study was based on a laboratory experiment and used an independent measures design. The participants were sampled using opportunity sample. The sample consisted of 30 participants and the target population was Shrewsbury International School Year 11-13. All participants were given standardized instructions and were told to learn a list of 10 adjectives. The participants in the first condition, which was the resting condition, were asked to rest for 5 minutes. The participants in the second condition, which was the synonym condition, were asked to learn another 10 adjectives that were synonyms to the original list of adjectives for five minutes. The participants in the third condition, which was the antonym condition, were asked to learn another 10 adjectives that were antonyms of the original list of adjectives for five minutes. After the 5 minutes, all participants were then asked to recall the original list of 10 adjectives by writing it down on a piece of paper. The directional hypothesis is the group of participants that rested during the 5-minute-interval would recall significantly more adjectives from the original list than those who learned the synonyms during the 5-minute-interval. The results show that the participants in the resting condition recalled an average of 8.7 adjectives, those in the synonym condition recalled an average of 6.4 adjectives (this was significant at the 0.05 level), and those in the antonym condition recalled an average of 7.4 adjectives. Therefore, the results support the directional hypothesis because the participants recalled significantly more adjectives in the resting condition than the synonym condition. As the results showed support to the hypothesis results, it can be concluded that retroactive interference do occur and the more similar the later material, the greater the interference and the higher level of forgetting. The findings of this experiment are significantly useful and can be implemented towards many aspects of learning and education. This can be applied in school and be implemented in daily teaching. People can implement this concept into learning in everyday life to prevent them from forgetting in LTM. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology essays

  1. An experiment to investigate the effect of interference on memory recall

    There are also theories to explain forgetting. One of which is the interference theory. This theory suggests that other information that we have previously stored or things we experience whilst trying to remember new information, can weaken our ability to store the new information.

  2. The aim of this experiment was to test the idea that effort and not ...

    The words to do with similar meaning i.e. semantics were recalled more than the words to do with similar sound i.e. acoustically similar which were recalled better than those words given visually. So according to this theory the different kinds of processing like visual, acoustic or semantic should reflect in different rates of recall as noted above.

  1. Cue dependent Forgetting. This experiment investigates Tulvings theory of cue dependent forgetting, with ...

    8 participants; 4 males 4 females between age of 18 and 24. The hypothesis is tested through a field experiment. This method was chosen due to the classroom being a natural setting for participants who are all college students. Previous research was done as a laboratory experiment.

  2. An experiment to investigation the effect of sorting words by their meaning and sorting ...

    The participants were selected by opportunity sampling because this was the quickest and most convenient method of getting a class of Y9s. Once the researcher had selected the Y9 class the participants were then able to volunteer to participate in the experiment and this was beneficial to the researcher because

  1. AS Psychology Coursework (Edexcel)

    Changing environments leads to a lack of cues and retrieval failure. My study will be solely on Context dependent forgetting. Smith (1970) gave participants a list of 80 words to learn while sitting in a distinctive basement room. The following day, he tested some participants in the same basement room

  2. Investigating the effects of organisation on learning

    The youngest was 16 and the oldest 18. Conditions were allocated to participants by alternation, whereby odd-numbered participants (1st, 3rd, 5th, ...) were allocated to Condition A (categorised) and even-numbered participants (2nd, 4th, 6th, ...) were allocated to Condition B (randomised).

  1. Report on Psychological Research into Eyewitness Testimony

    Loftus (1979) used the 'weapon focus' study to investigate the ability of an individual recall information after an emotionally arousing situation. Participants waited outside a laboratory to take part in an investigation, but as they were waiting a staged man exited the room carrying either a pen or a blood-covered paper knife.

  2. Evaluate 3 Approaches to treating Mental Disorders: Psychodynamic, Biological and Behavioural Approach.

    Many of these have involved abuse by a parent, relative or friend. Psychoanalysis assumes that childhood memories can be recalled in this way and actively encourages this in order to access the unconscious mind. In fact there is little evidence to suggest that childhood memories can be accessed in this

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work