• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Studies In The Cognitive Approach - Levels Of Processing (Craik and Lockhart 1972)

Extracts from this document...


Studies In The Cognitive Approach Levels Of Processing (Craik and Lockhart 1972) When given a list of words to learn, we can do one of three things to allow us to recall them on a later occasion. We can simply try to learn the words usual a visual method of just looking at the words. We can also think of words that rhyme with the word that has to be learnt, this is the auditory method. Finally we can associate the words with other words e.g. car and drive, this is a semantic way to remember things. Craik and Lockhart carried out the following study to investigate which form of memory gives the best recall. Three groups of people were given a list of words to learn. ...read more.


Its not the only theory for memory, Atkinson and Shiffron proposed the dual-process model. This study supports the assumption of cognition, that information is processed. It also seems a fair claim to say that the more you concentrate on something the more likely you are to remember it, because it has got more of your attention. The multi store model backs it up, the rehearsal loop can be seen processing more deeply. Miller proposed chunking as a way to help you remember things, this can also be seen as a way of deeper processing. Context Dependant Forgetting (Bouton et Al 1999) Forgetting may occur due to a number of different reasons such as trace decay and interference. But this study focuses on the failure to retrieve, not the failure to store. ...read more.


From this evidence Bouton et Al could then say that it's not that we forget things, but we don't recall them because the conditions aren't correct. Evaluation Most of the research carried out by Bouton et Al was done on non-human animals and the findings were generalised to humans. The results do show a lot about how the non-human animals thinking works, you can argue that generalising it to humans is not acceptable as we are not non-human animals. The research that was carried out was done in the area of memory and the non-human animal research was carried out in the area of conditioning, so it could be said that these are different cognitive skills, so the two experiments do not back each other up. There are other experiments also carried out based on this theory by many psychologists, which back this up. But its not the only theory for forgetting there is trace decay and also interference. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Craik and Lockhart believed that depth is a critical concept for levels of processing ...

    4 star(s)

    If anyone was still trying to do this after 1 1/4 hours then they were excluded from the experiment. He found out that most of the participants took six sorts to gain 95% consistency. At this point, they were given an unexpected free recall test.

  2. Psychology Retrospective Interference coursework

    Condition 3 is the antonym condition which the participants were asked to learn a new list of antonyms of the original list of 10 adjectives. According to retro-interference theory, the more similar the new material to the original, the more the recall of the original list will decline.

  1. Investigating Levels Of Processing Using Images

    After answering the questions participants were presented with a list of 180 words and asked to tick any words they recognised from the words previously shown to them. Results showed that: * 17% of words in physical appearance * 37% in rhyming condition * 65% in meaning condition...were remembered.

  2. How levels of processing affects memory

    Method Design For this experiment a laboratory experiment was chosen. This is a type of experiment that is conducted in a well-controlled environment. All the participants took part in the experiment in the same room, which was a biology classroom.

  1. Levels Of Processing

    have very high ecological validity however it will make sure all the external variables are controlled. I also intend to keep the same principal of a word list, questions and an unrelated task that Craik and Tulving used but of course I will use different words, questions and the task from Craik and Tulving that the participants have to perform.

  2. Retrieval Induced Forgetting in Coherent Narrative Text.

    Their mean age was 22.1. The control condition had thirty-four participants made up of 26 females and 8 males. Their mean age was also 22.1. Materials In this study we used 2 Russian Folk Tales as our coherent narrative text.

  1. To What Extent Is motivated Forgetting Produced By Failure Feedback?

    The test sheet had a list of 30 states and the state capitals (on the opposite side). The participants had to learn these in the time given (10 minutes). The participants were then given the first response sheet (C1) and they were all the same.

  2. Evaluate 3 Approaches to treating Mental Disorders: Psychodynamic, Biological and Behavioural Approach.

    This reference to hidden states makes them untestable, to Popper?s way of thinking. For example, Popper suggested that only when some individuals are not neurotic is it possible to experimentally determine if prospective patients are currently neurotic. He pointed out that because psychoanalysis holds that every individual is neurotic to

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work