• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent does psychological research support the accuracy of eye witness testimony?

Extracts from this document...


To what extent does psychological research support the accuracy of eye witness testimony? (18 marks) Eye Witness Testimony is an area of research into a witness' recollection of an event, (crime, act of violence, car crash), and the accuracy of their memory. It can prove accurate and invaluable to police investigations but it is also fallible. This research studies what about the testimony is reliable, why errors are made and how to make them more reliable. * Rattner reviewed 205 cases of "wrongful arrest" and found that in 52 % of cases, incorrect EWT had been to blame. * This could be due to Bartlett's theory of Reconstructive Memory. This is the idea that witnesses take original information (e.g. a folk story, as Bartlett studied in 1932), and use "effort after meaning" with their existing ideas, experience and cultural teachings (schemas). * Loftus said that certain situations improve the validity of EWT, which include proximity to the incident, racial similarities and the sobriety and emotional state of the witness. There are a lot of studies finding errors in EWT - Elizabeth Loftus, in 1979, found that Weapon Focus in a hostile situation detracts the witness from the description of the accused. ...read more.


Loftus and Palmer researched this effect by showing participants a video of a car crash and asking them to estimate to speed of the car. They were divided into groups and each asked a slight variation of the same question: * How fast were the cars going when they Contacted each other? * How fast were the cars going when they Hit each other? * How fast were the cars going when the Smashed each other? It was found that this word affected the speed estimation. There was roughly 10mph difference between the contacting cars and the smashing cars. One week later, those in the "smashed" group consistently reconstructed their memories to include broken glass. However, there is very low ecological validity in this experiment, it has confounded variables such as age and gender, and the stress levels of the participants. It also has the possibility of having demand characteristics due to the groups, people will not want to be abnormal and not go along with the group's answer (Levels of conformity). Conformity can influence EWT as people want to give answers that are "acceptable" to their peers, known as Normative influence, or when unsure, a participant can look to other members of the group for guidance and assurance, (informational influence). ...read more.


Foster told one group that it was a real robbery and that their choice would affect the trial, the other group assumed it was a simulation. The group who felt the consequences of their actions made fewer mistakes. This creates doubt for lab experiments into EWT due to their lack of ecological validity. Christianson and Hubinette researched "real-life" witnesses. Victims, (rather than onlookers) could recall details very accurately and still had good recall after 15 months. This evidence helps to prove Loftus' theory that proximity and having powerful emotions can have a very positive effect on EWT. In conclusion, although there is a large quantity of research into the fallibility of eyewitness testimonies, all of which viable and not without merit, however the artificiality of the majority of the experiments make it hard to prove them true. Many confounding factors may have an impact on a testimony in "real-life" such as stress, panic, fear, eye sight, visibility due to smoke/rain/distance from the incident, intoxication, novelty factor, time lapse between event and testimony, social desirability, the desire to please the interrogator, interference, and how much responsibility comes with giving the testimony. The Flashbulb Memory model also has influence here and is apparent in Christianson and Hubinette's research, as most witnesses to violence or crime can remember it as though taking a "photograph" and can remember the smells and colours for years. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Measurements of Accuracy of Eyewitness Testimonies

    4 star(s)

    than 'collided', 'bumped', 'hit' and 'contacted' (31.8) respectively. In a second experiment each subject was shown a short film that showed a multiple car accident. Loftus and Palmer asked 50 subjects, "How fast were the cars going when they hit each other?", and 50 subjects were asked the same question with the word 'smashed' substituted instead of 'hit'.

  2. Peer reviewed

    To what extent does research support the view that eyewitness testimony is unreliable?

    3 star(s)

    alone, except in exceptional circumstances such as the witness is a friend or relative, or when there is substantial corroborative evidence. Age can have a large impact on eyewitness testimony. It has been shown that children are less likely to produce a complete or accurate account of events and this

  1. In this assignment the Author intends to discuss, evaluate and research the reliability and ...

    (Claridge and Davies, 2003; Gelder et al., 1989; Richard Gross, 2010). The fact that there are different classification schemes demonstrates that there's' a certain degree of arbitrariness about how people are diagnosed, DSM-IV and ICD-10 merely represent the current beliefs of experts in the field regarding how such psychological disorders should be classified.

  2. Describe the application of behaviorist perspectives in health and social care. Describe the application ...

    The use of these defence mechanisms will allow an individual to block out thing that will have a negative effect on them such as painful experience of the mind. There are sever mechanism that an individual can use in different situations and these are:- Repression This causes the person to

  1. Section B Essay: Eye Witness Testimony

    This suggests that the experiment may not have been valid as it may have been measuring the participants' edibility to estimate speed as opposed to effect of leading questions on recall. The study by Duncan (1976) also used an unrepresentative sample.

  2. Memory's Impact

    Level of Significance A Mann-Whitney U test was used due to the following reasons: * The hypotheses predicted a difference between the two sets of data. * The data used were the number of words recalled which is interval data.

  1. Describe and Evaluate Research by E.Loftus into Eye Witness Testimony, the implications of the ...

    The results show that the verb used in the original question influenced whether the participants had thought they seen broken glass, those participants that heard the word smashed were more than twice as likely to recall seeing broken glass. Loftus and Palmer gave two explanations for the findings of their first experiment.

  2. Discuss research that suggests that anxiety can affect the accuracy of eye witnesses.

    A counter criticism to Loftus? experiment is Mitchell et al?s (1998) explanation of the weapons effect. Mitchell claimed ?the presence of a weapon is unusual and that is why people focus on it, therefore it is not anxiety of a situation but a novelty?;

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work