• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

We do not possess any genuine freedom to act ethically Discuss

Extracts from this document...


"We do not possess any genuine freedom to act ethically" Discuss A person who acts ethically is one who will choose to make good decisions, those that are deemed right and good avoiding the wrong decisions which may have negative consequences. We can link the idea of acting ethically with morals, as an ethical person will have a good set of morals, this is because it is our morals that help is to freely decide which decisions to make, and encourage us to act selflessly and ethically. Believers in the Free Will or incompatiblism, would argue that the choices we make in life are entirely our own, and that if we live a moral life and make good decisions, that is something that we have chosen to do. They believe that Free Will itself is having the ability to choose to do whatever you like; to choose between right and wrong actions, we do however need to understand that we hold the responsibility for the outcome of those choices and have to deal with the consequences. This argument therefore supports the idea that we have the genuine freedom to act ethically, their belief that each person is born with Free Will and therefore the right to make their own decisions whether they be good or bad means they can choose to act ethically or not, making us morally responsible for our actions. ...read more.


An alternative point of view is that of determinism. Whilst followers of Free Will believe that we are morally responsible for the actions that we carry out freely and deliberately, determinism holds the belief that there are laws of nature acting upon us, and it is these laws which govern everything which happens and that all out actions are a result of these laws. They believe that each of our actions and choices we make are determined by the situation immediately before it, and the one before that and so on. They believe that because of this, freedom of choice, freedom to act ethically is just an illusion, rendering personal responsibility a meaningless concept, along with the idea of blame and punishment. This however raises questions of guilt and why we still feel a sense of responsibility, for example if a man inevitably hit a girl who ran out in front of his car, whilst this is not his fault as it couldn't have been avoided, he will still feel responsible for the incident. This criticism is answered in different ways; the idea of hard and soft determinism. Firstly Hard determinism is the stricter of the two, it argues that all our actions had prior causes and that we are neither free nor responsible. It believes that we do not possess any free will at all and that it is in fact just an illusion; that if we are to commit a crime ...read more.


This argument also includes God, it believes that the force that determines your life is God and that from the moment you are born your life is planned out. However it believes that your life consists of major decisions, and for each of these decisions there is several choices, God knows all of these choices and the outcome of each one, however he doesn't know which choice we are going to make, and therefore we still have the ability to choose freely. In conclusion, there are many different idea concerning ethics and our ability to live ethically. Whilst it is possible as hard determinists would believe that freedom to choose is in fact an illusion and that the way in which we act has nothing to do with us, this argument seems cold and raises many questions about why we are alive in the first place, as well as raising problems with the idea of heaven and h**l, because if we are not judged for our actions why should people who have done bad go to heaven just because it was determined they would when they were born. It seems that it is more likely that free will does exist whether we have total free will and ability to do whatever we choose or whether it is in some ways restricted in that we have limited choices such as that in soft determinism, it appears as though out ability to choose between right and wrong is out choice, and there for our responsibility. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. "Religious Language is meaningless." Discuss.

    For example: Where on the wisdom scale would God fit? Where would be appropriate for God? The theory also puts God on a pedestal and makes him hard to relate to him. How big is the scale? It could be more helpful to think in terms of metaphor.

  2. Our freedom to make ethical choices is an illusion Discuss

    However many Christians reject deterministic ideas and believe that we do have free will and God has not chosen the elect, such as Pelagius. They state that why bother evangelizing if God has already chosen who he will save and those who will not.

  1. we do not possess any genuine freedom to act ethically

    Free-will, or Libertarianism, by contrast, is the idea that we have complete moral responsibility and we are not compelled to act by outside forces as we follow our intuitions. Scientifically talking, the idea of freedom relates to the casualty of randomness.

  2. All of our Choices are Predetermined

    Asking someone who has no preference of good over evil, or pleasure over pain, to make a moral decision would be rather like asking someone whether they prefer white to white. Without personality, we would not be able to make any choice at all, as no options would appeal to us over others.

  1. "Liberalism puts too much emphasis on freedom at the expense of other values." Discuss

    It is questionable, again, whether the advocacy of laissez-faire values is really necessary to personal freedom, and although laissez-faire capitalism does allow for some to develop themselves through enterprise it does not provide the same opportunity for everyone to do this, and thus one could question whether this economy really

  2. An embodied life in heaven is entirely possible. Discuss.

    When a person dies they remain in the grave until the Day of Judgement. Allah judges and decides what happens to all believers, not only Muslims and his decision is ultimate. People who have pursued the teachings of Allah will live eternally in Paradise, a perfect world of rest and pleasure.

  1. Sartre is a very strong proponent of strong determinism, that is, he does not ...

    So long as bodies are free from the influence of intelligence, these rules will apply and apply consistently. Determinists seem to be able to take this whole ideology one step further by saying that even with "intelligence," everything must follow physical rules and laws.

  2. Ethical language is meaningless. Discuss.

    in the case of Hitler. Emotivism also allows everyone complete freedom of action since everyone?s opinion is equally valid but there may be many problems that occur because of this. Another non-cognitive theory of ethics ? proposed by R.M.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work