• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The religious experience argument is the most convincing proof for the existence of God. How far do you agree with this statement?

Extracts from this document...


'The religious experience argument is the most convincing proof for the existence of God.' How far do you agree with this statement? This essay will discuss the reasons both, for and against the above statement. I will analyse the arguments put forward by a variety of philosophers and thus reach a conclusion. Religious experiences can be defined as a subjective experience where an individual reports contact with a transcendent reality, an encounter or union with the divine. An example of such can be noted Biblically from the times of Saul - a man who spent his life persecuting Christians. Randomly, Saul saw a light and heard a voice asking him why he persecuted Christians. After this, he had made a journey to Damascus where he realised that the voice he heard was in fact God. Saul took this experience as a form of realisation and converted to Christianity - which eventually led him to the title of Saint Paul - the man who was virtually responsible got moving Christianity from the Middle East to Europe. Philosopher Richard Swinburne divides religious experiences into five categories - two of which are public and three private. The first public event is an experience which can be seen by everyone. ...read more.


Thus, the conclusion follows probably from the premises and inferences. Thus both agree with the statement. However, there are also arguments against the statement and thus religious experiences. There are three main types of criticism. These can be categorised into description, object and subject related. Description related challenges discuss claims the experience something when the description is self contradictory or inconsistent. Such challenges can be defeated by showing that there is no real contradiction or inconsistency - the idea of God does not include any contradiction. Subject related challenges discusses experimental claims because the person claiming the experience is unreliable or, for instance, has not had the proper training to correctly evaluate the experience. Davies maintains, however, that in the case of religious experiences a very simple person may have as profound an experience as a more sophisticated one. Further, even much religious training or guidance by a spiritual master does not grantee that a religious experience will result. Object related challenges state that if, on the basis of background evidence, it is highly unlikely that the thing claims is to be experienced was present. Then the claim might be dismissed. The Loch Ness monster might fall into this category. ...read more.


This argument can be used as proof for God as religious experiences occur without 'conditioning' - without any prior thinking about God. However, the anti realists approach by Nicholas Lash states that the chain of events does not start at a religious experience. Instead, we think of God and then read Holy books, we go on to learn doctrines and then in turn have religious experiences. This argument, however, does not prove the existence of God. It is indoctrinated within a religion - meaning we have to think about God first. In conclusion, I believe that the argument will fail to convince and atheist, unless they themselves experience it. It is hard to understand and empathise with an idea you disagree with when there is no real proof. A.E Taylor states that: 'As an artist is trained to see art everywhere - a religious person is trained to see God everywhere.' By this Taylor is stating that it will take a religious person to understand a religious experience - whereas, if an atheist was faced with the same situation - they would easily come to other conclusions. Therefore, I conclude that religious experiences may strengthen the faith of believers - especially those who have experienced one - However, they will fail to convince an atheist due to their many alternative explanations. ?? ?? ?? ?? Uzma Tariq 12.06 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Describe the main strengths and weaknesses of the cosmological argument for the existence of ...

    X is caused to exist by something else?41 Hume writes: "...as all distinct ideas are separable from each other, and as the ideas of cause and effect are evidently distinct, 'twill be easy for us to conceive any object to be non-existent this moment, and existent the next, without conjoining

  2. The Ontological Argument is convincing

    There is one flaw in Anselm's argument. As Anselm was a Christian he would have believed that God is transcendent and beyond human understanding. Therefore, it is contradictory to say that God is "that than which nothing greater can be conceived" because God isn't conceivable.

  1. "An analysis of arguments for the existence of God will result in valid philosophical ...

    For such a person, unless God can be empirically verified - can put into a beaker and tested - he is not real. Yet, if this could be the case, he wouldn't be the all-knowing, all-powerful God of the Abrahamic religions; if anything, the strong empiricist has wiped God off his own radar.

  2. Proof and Probability in Arguing for God's Existence.

    Therefore the arguments are valid. Testing the 'goodness' of deductive arguments You may feel indignant at my claim to have a valid argument stating that euthanasia is wrong. You may want to come back at me, and argue that euthanasia is not murder, and so accuse me of begging the question.

  1. Knowledge of God and/or ourselves can be transformed by religious experience Examine and comment ...

    This challenge gives us a deeper understanding into the human mind as well rather than a deeper knowledge of God. However this challenge is not really relevant the conversion RE as these are where people are converting away from their prior faith rather than following it.

  2. Assess whether the cosmological argument proves the existence of God.

    He claims that all contingent beings like humans, have a shelf life or a definite period of time for their existence, and they will cease to exist at some time. These all depend upon something else to exist. But if everything were to be contingent, then there would be a

  1. Discuss the varieties of religious experience

    As a psychologist, James coolly analyses these experiences, and then argues that religious experience may well just be psychological phenomena in our brains however this doesn?t rule out that there could be some sort of supernatural force which accompanies this.

  2. Examine and comment on how far the study of religious experience can illuminate an ...

    Matthew 21:22, ?And all things, whatsoever ye shall ask in prayer, believing, ye shall receive.? This perspective is shared among many theists.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work