• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Analyse Wiles view on miracles

Extracts from this document...


Transfer-Encoding: chunked ´╗┐Analyse Wiles? view on miracles Miracles are defined as events which seem to defy the laws of nature, and are sometimes interpreted as acts of god by religious people. The legitimacy of miracles have always been debated by philosophers. Maurice Wiles was a philosopher in the 20th century who wrote his view on miracle in his book God?s Action in the World. His argument was that God would not act in the world or break his own laws of nature. Wiles put his argument forward in 3 statements. Firstly he says, if miracles are violations of the laws of nature they have to occur infrequently to avoid the concepts of laws of nature becoming meaningless. ...read more.


Lastly, Wiles says that the large amount of evil events that are not prevented by God raises questions about God?s omnipotence and goodness. Wiles is saying that if God intervenes to perform miracles, he would?ve also intervened to prevent evil events, such as the holocaust. It does not make sense that if an omnibenevolent God could act in the world that he would let preventable, evil things happen to his people. Wiles rejects the idea that God only responds to special prayers and particular circumstances. He says that this would mean that God is biased and arbitrary and therefore not all loving or omniscient. The argument put forward by Wiles to explain why God cannot perform Miracles is that the universe is a single ongoing act of creation. ...read more.


John Polkinghorne also argues that Wiles? view of God?s action in the world does not reflect Christian religious experience of God. For many religious believers, God cannot be limited to what is rationally possible according to humans. Wiles argument requires that human rationality can be applied directly to God. Many people disagree that Gods actions have to conform to some form of rational order that we understand. To conclude, Maurice Wiles? view was that God does not break laws of nature in order to perform miracles in the world. Instead Wiles says that God is always acting in the world, sustaining the universe. He argues that if God broke his laws of nature they would have to be broken very infrequently or the laws would become meaningless. Also the miracles seen happen in strange patterns and if God is going to intervene he would stop evil events from happening. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. The idea of miracles is a major obstacle to faith in the modern world ...

    act which 'breaks the rules' of the world to a much weaker definition, which does not include suspension of the laws of physics. Many philosophical and naturalistic challenges to the idea of miracles have focused on a certain type of 'law-breaking' miracle, but within the Judeo-Christian tradition the idea of miracle has more depth than that.

  2. Assess Humes reasons for rejecting miracles

    According to Atkins it is only the publicity seeker or someone deluded or hallucinating who would claim to have witnessed such an event as they may lack the scientific level of understanding of their peers, therefore Hume's argument is relevant.

  1. Discuss the suggestion that it is pointless to analyse religious experience

    Moreover what was perhaps most important to James, due to his belief in existentialism, was not the analysis of the experience, the cause or the reality of it; but instead the effects that it had on the person.

  2. Socrates’ View of Persuasion

    After Gorgias and Polus are forced to concede Socrates' claim, Callicles then argues Socrates to a draw by positing sinisterly that "might makes right." Therefore, according to Callicles, using rhetorical skill to be powerful in the city-state is "right" because the power to do what one wishes is the only reliable criterion for good.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work