• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

compare Plato and Aristotle's view of the soul

Extracts from this document...


Compare Aristotle and platos' concept of the body and soul. The two philosophers Plato and Aristotle both had theories concerning the body and soul. Plato was a dualist believing the body and soul where two separate parts to a person. Aristotle however did not. Plato believed that the soul was the single most important part of a person and believed in the importance of moral concepts, ideas and the afterlife. Aristotle however, was more interested in the physical world and the forces adopted within this. He was interested in observation and his theories unlike Plato's were based on the functions of physical things and how well they perform. ...read more.


Aristotle believed, however that the body and soul are two interdependent parts to a human as the support and rely on each other. One example used by Aristotle would be movement. He would say that only the body can move, however it needs the soul to be able to move or tell the body what to do, unless accidentally. In this way he implies that without one the other would not be able to perform the tasks it needs. They rely on each other. Therefore Aristotle is saying the two entities are intertwined and belong together and cannot exist optimally without the other. Therefore unlike Plato's ideas suggesting that the "perfect" or morally good part of a person is within the soul or connection ...read more.


Aristotle believed that the mind connected the soul and body as it the soul itself is divided into separate parts. The section connecting the soul and body would be the "irrational" part. This is where according to Aristotle the material desires and wants would be contained. Plato would disagree with this as he believed the soul had no connection with the physical world what so ever and that physical wants were merely a distraction from what is really important. Aristotle's explanation of the soul is more detailed than that of Plato's. Ultimately, the ideas of the body and soul differ between Plato and Aristotle as that they believe the soul have different roles and that Aristotle unlike Plato believes they are more or less inseparable. The similarities lie in the mind being the connection between soul and body. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Plato versus Aristotle on well being

    things are not in the right balance then it becomes a matter of damaging your mental health. Plato believes that justice is gratifying in itself not merely because of its consequences. The purpose of human life is to live virtuously.

  2. Explain Plato's and Aristotle's ideas of form, body, knowledge and soul.

    exist on their own but only in relation to the subject ('elephant'). Although substance and quality are one of ten categories identified by Aristotle it is only substance which he believed underlined everything else. For instance, if there were no 'elephant' then is this instance 'large' and 'white' would have no relationship to it (i.e.

  1. Evaluate plato and aristotle on well being

    air about it, as through living a virtuous life he had reached eudemonia because for Plato virtue is sufficient for human well being. Then to illustrate the extreme of what Plato is saying a second ring is added, and it is put to Plato that if both men had a

  2. Plato & The Soul

    However this provides one of the most serious and potentially defeating criticisms of Plato's views on the soul. He fails to address the issue of the interrelationship between body and soul, if they are indeed distinct. Does the soul act as controller of a lifeless body, or is there more to the body than simply the material.

  1. Body soul destinction

    The soul is not divisible and therefore on this basis of Aquinas' argument it is able to survive death. However, through the link with a particular human body the soul becomes an individual so even when the body dies the soul that departs has an immortal existence.

  2. Explain the fundamental ideas of resurrection and immortality of the soul. (18)

    This can be seen by mediums such as George Anderson who in one reading was able to communicate with a lady?s mother in the afterlife who to tell him about her sister who died as a baby, information he wouldn?t of been able to obtain otherwise and therefore Hick argues that this shouldn?t be ignored.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work