Critically examine the contributions which Ashoka made to the early development of Buddhism.

Authors Avatar

Penny Williams 13S

(a) Critically examine the contributions which Ashoka made to the early development of Buddhism.

At the beginning of Ashoka’s reign (c.269 BCE) Buddhism had been in existence and expansion for about two hundred years.  The Second Council had already occurred by that time, and there were disagreements over the Vinaya (rules for the monks).  Buddhism had only spread throughout North India and was widely seen as a religion for monks, which was supported by the lay people (those who were not monks).

Ashoka’s grandfather, Chandragupta, had created the Mauryan Dynasty, which extended the Kingdom of Magadha to cover the whole of Northern India.  Since Ashoka’s father, Bindusara, was a powerful monarch, Ashoka would have been educated and trained in the Brahminical religion and brought up to be a militaristic ruler.  The Brahminical concept of kingship involves conquest and enlargement of land ownership, which is greatly different to the Buddhist promotion of peace.  Ashoka was very much a typical Brahminical king, and was said in the Buddhist Chronicles to have been a bloodthirsty monarch.  He expanded his empire through many battles; his last was the conquest of Kalinga which created much unnecessary carnage.  When Ashoka saw the devastation he had caused it led him to convert to Buddhist ways, although evidence suggests that he had become a Buddhist two years earlier.  Ashoka not only became a ‘Follower of the Dharma’ in practice, but also led his kingdom according to Buddhist principles and so made great contributions towards its early development.

Join now!

Ashoka had edicts inscribed on stone pillars and placed throughout his kingdom.  These meant that the lay people, who up until then had had not much to do with the Buddhist practices, could now understand the teachings of the Buddha which were previously too complicated for them to follow.  The edicts are of great value as a source of information on Ashoka’s policies.  They are more reliable than the Ceylon Chronicles, although without these the connection between the King Piyadasi in the edicts and the great emperor Ashoka would never have been made.

The edicts were written for ...

This is a preview of the whole essay